- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
- Messages
- 16,833
- Reaction score
- 20,629
So should 4th amendment protections for suspected illegals be revoked across the entire country? Or just allow expedited removals from beyond the 100 mile zone?
The Supreme Court already ruled the expedited removal law does not violate the 4th Amendment.
The fact that expedited removals are done within 100 miles of the border or from the interior of the country is irrelevant as to the constitutionality of the law.
Either a rule violates the Constitution or it does not. The geographical area where the rule is enforced is irrelevant.
So Trump is violating the spirit of the law as applied by previous presidents but not the letter?
You're just making a baseless assumption on what you think the spirit of the law is without even reading what it actually is.
Expedited removals make more sense when they're restricted or caveated like they were initially when they were used near ports of entry or later within the 100 mile border zone(which I disagree with), to endlessly expand it just undermines due process.
I'm referring to warrantless searches that are allowed within the 100 mile border zone.
I mean that's literally just your opinion what it "should" be instead of what it actually is.
Last edited: