uppercuts21
Brown Belt
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2007
- Messages
- 3,800
- Reaction score
- 0
IMO wrestling is the best base. It seems to me that wrestling is the hardest skill to pick up and excel at it (with the exception of GSP, but he's phenomenal). All these wrestlers are going into mma and are learning striking and subs at a very fast rate(Diego, Kos, Brock, Tito, Hughes, Couture, etc...). The same can't really be said to the same degree about bjj guys and strikers learning wrestling at the same rate.
Plus a wrestler can dictate whether the fight stays standing or hits the ground (which is extremely important in a fight, considering the opponents skills).
None of those guys are good strikers though.
I do however agree that wrestling is the best base for MMA. Alot of people say BJJ but in my opinion it doesnt compare to wrestling. I'd rather teach a wrestler BJJ than teach a BJJ guy wrestling. Some of the best BJJ practitioners in MMA cant even take the fight to the ground because they lack takedowns. Guys like Crane, Palhares (fought Henderson I know) who couldnt get their man down and ended up being forced into a standup battle despite having no striking ability. I dont think there is anything more frustrating than being a ground fighter and not being able to take your man down. Because you're pretty much forced to take a beating. lol.
If anybody doubts the importance of wrestling they must not have been paying attention to MMA the past few years. Kos, Lesnar, GSP, Fitch, Sherk, Guida, Edgar are all guys who rely heavily on their wrestling to win fights. And with the exception of a couple of these fighters all of them have been able to progress through the ranks despite being one-dimensional.