BATMAN V SUPERMAN (Dragonlord's Review, post #1)

If you have seen BATMAN V SUPERMAN, how would you rate it?


  • Total voters
    389

Dragonlordxxxxx

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Senior Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
86,742
Reaction score
26,228
Update: March 25, 2016

Dragonlord's Review of BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE
(Spoilers)

Bottom Line: Batman v Superman is a bloated, joyless mess that crams so many storylines, wastes two major events (Batman vs Superman and Doomsday) and twists your favorite characters into something that audience will automatically reject.

fDbPWb0.jpg


After decades of unsuccessful attempts to bring these characters together on the silver screen, two of the most iconic fictional characters finally face off in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Unfortunately, Warner Bros.’ agenda to catch up with the competition impairs what could have been an epic movie by suffusing it with incongruous scenes clearly meant as a set-up for the Justice League movie.

BvS starts off on a wrong note with a credits intro of the funeral and murder of Bruce Wayne’s parents. There’s nothing groundbreaking or anything fresh to see here. It's a gratuitous scene with director Zack Snyder self indulging in lots of slow motion moments. The only thing I liked was how they staged the mugger’s gun snapping Martha Wayne’s pearl necklace (a la Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns). We also have a déjà vu scene of young Bruce stumbling into the Batcave and then being swarmed by a colony of bats. Then young Bruce magically floats among the bats. WTF?? Thankfully, that part was just a dream because it was corny as hell.

So why did director Snyder decide to go with this intro? I suspect it’s his artsy way of saying that the movie starts with a funeral and ends in a funeral. (In fairness, it could be the screenwriters’ fault also) Then we switch to what SHOULD have been the main intro with a much older Bruce Wayne frantically driving to the Wayne building in Metropolis in the middle of Superman’s battle with General Zod in Man of Steel. It’s an exciting scene and gives me hope for what’s to come next. But it’s just sheer stupidity how the Wayne employees only started to evacuate the building AFTER Bruce Wayne told them to.

x2YuTPw.jpg


That hope I was talking about gradually eroded as the first half of the movie passed by. Scenes were poorly edited which resulted in an uneven pacing. The narration didn’t flow organically. Felt like they shot two separate movies and stitched them together haphazardly.

The extended “Knightmare” dream/future vision sequence including the surprise appearance by a DC character was unnecessary and dissonant with the rest of the film. It’s like Christian Bale’s John Connor appearing briefly to Sarah Connor at the motel in the 1984's Terminator movie warning her about the events of Terminator 3. It’s just jarring and needless at this point. The striking image of Bruce Wayne looking up from the rubble of the Wayne building at the beginning of the film asserts the character’s motivation and speaks more volumes than all the nightmare scenes. Plus we are treated to a badly-edited Batman fight sequence that will make The Dark Knight Rises blush.

There are a few perplexing moments like why would Superman be blamed for the death of the terrorists and civilians in Africa when it’s clear that they were killed by guns. Or why did Superman not bother to stop the truck that Batman was chasing. Or the head-scratching hallucinatory scene with Clark's father on a mountain that should have been left on the cutting room floor. Or the fact that Luthor's files on Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Cyborg and The Flash comes complete with each superheroes' logo.

u5kTbeu.png


As for the much-anticipated fight between Batman and Superman, it was glorious and awesomely staged when viewing it without context. You just have to turn off your brain a little to ignore how Superman could have ended the fight quickly in a number of different ways or how he could just have blurted hastily on multiple occasions: “Bruce my mom is kidnapped by Lex Luthor. I need your help please.” Instead we get, "Bruce, listen to me..." and "Please listen to me..."

But if you add the circumstances that led to the BvS fight, they goofed up big time. What made the fights between the two characters in The Dark Knight Returns or Hush a classic was that Batman was the underdog and the clear protagonist that had the moral authority between the two. Batman, a mere human, going up against a god; it’s a classic David vs. Goliath underdog story. But in the BvS fight, it is Superman who is in the right and Batman is the asshole whose motives you barely understand but don’t really side with. So the audience ends up being conflicted when they should be fully rooting for “the little man” (Bats) to win against overwhelming odds. Adding a red Kryptonite element to the story would have solved some of these problems.

Then we come to the most stupidest moment of the movie. Batman stops trying to kill Superman when he finds out their mothers have the same first name. The revelation is supposed to open Batman's eyes that Superman is just one of us but it really comes off as idiotic in its execution. Not to mention the cringey "save Martha" line (who the hell says their mother's first name?).

After Batman conveniently (magically even) admits to being wrong about Superman, the two agree to work together to save the day. With the murkiness of their motivations cleared up and the audience wholeheartedly rooting for both characters, Batman v Superman starts being enjoyable and finally feels like a Goddamn superhero movie. After 90 joyless, gloomy minutes, the movie starts being fun. The Doomsday plot could have been built up better (or saved for a proper movie in the future) but I didn’t care at this point as the movie was now firing on all cylinders. Clearly shoehorned but it didn’t matter, Wonder Woman’s appearance at the final battle just added more fun to the mix.

wUl0be2.jpg


Most of Sherdog and the rest of the world were wrong with two out of the three most controversial casting from the movie – Ben Affleck as Bruce Wayne/Batman and Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman.

Affleck was fantastic in the role and aesthetically speaking is the best Bruce Wayne among the entire movie incarnations (not Jon Hamm perfect but close). As I said many times before, it’s much harder to pull off Bruce Wayne than Batman, where stunt-doubles and editing can make anyone in that cape and cowl look good. But still, Snyder’s version wins for having the best Batman movie fight scenes yet. Christopher Nolan might have snuck on the set and secretly directed the “Knightmare” sequence because that Batman fight scene there was embarrassing to watch.

Gadot was sexy and a nice, fun reprieve from the downer vibe of the movie. Her action scenes, as well as her theme music that accompanied her debut, were bad-ass. And even though the Justice League member cameos felt tacked-on, I couldn’t help but get excited seeing them (again thanks to Wonder Woman’s riveting score playing in the background).

2eSbkug.jpg


The third controversial casting was Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. It’s kind of a mixed bag for me. Under normal circumstances, Luthor’s Joker-like personality is annoying and off-putting. But under the film’s overall glum tone where characters are even afraid to crack a smile, his manic energy is at times welcomed as he seems to be the only character having fun. But all in all, it's still a really terrible Lex Luthor rendition. One thing is for sure though, I’m glad this Luthor’s master plan doesn’t revolve around a freakin’ get-rich, real estate scheme.

Henry Cavill will get a lot of flak for his somber, uncharismatic performance but it’s not his fault since he is given so little to work with from the dour script and direction. Also, the script is too ambitious for its own good, presenting different political, social and theological themes/undertones while juggling to be a commercial blockbuster film as well as setting up the Justice League movie.

Between the two main characters, I was drawn more to the Superman side of the story in BvS. If they stuck to the original plan of Man of Steel 2, before Warner Bros. decided to insert Batman and Wonder Woman in there, I think the story would have worked much better. Even in BvS, you can still see the framework of the Man of Steel 2 script before the addendums.

kJe9Tea.jpg


Just like in Man of Steel, Lois Lane has a tiresome habit of being tacked on in several major scenes with some of them being superfluous, like dropping the Kryptonite spear in the water and then picking it up later. Other than that, Amy Adams was solid. Her bathtub scene is probably one of the most titillating non-R rated scenes in comic book history.

Despite the great action and several gorgeous, picturesque imagery in BvS, Snyder might be the wrong director for the Justice League movie. His extreme doom and gloom tone might not be a good fit which I suspect some moviegoers have begun to get tired of. BvS also proves that the DC Extended Universe needs a Kevin Feige counterpart (maybe Paul Dini or Bruce Timm) to guide the DCEU and to rein in filmmakers’ questionable decisions.

Overall, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice succumbed to the burden of juggling too much on its plate. The first half of the movie lacked cohesion and was poorly edited/paced. The actual Batman-Superman fight was very well-done but the set-up for the showdown was atrocious could have been so much better (see paragraph 8). It’s not until the two main characters start working together that the film truly comes alive. Snyder was too preoccupied coming up with his version of Watchmen than crafting a well-told superhero movie, too busy deconstructing it rather than building a good foundation.

RATING: 5.5/10


Link to previous Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice threads:

[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]
 
Last edited:
Update: March 23, 2017

BATMAN V SUPERMAN Producer Brett Ratner Slams Rotten Tomatoes Over Film's Low Score


nq8BAUf.jpg


Director and producing mogul Brett Ratner says film critic aggregation site Rotten Tomatoes is a destructive force in Hollywood.

Speaking at the Sun Valley Film Festival last weekend, the X-Men: The Last Stand director wanted to make it clear he has plenty respect for traditional film critics. But he says reducing hundreds of reviews culled from print and online sources into a popularized aggregate score has become a toxic and often inaccurate label.

“The worst thing that we have in today’s movie culture is Rotten Tomatoes,” said Ratner, whose company RatPac Entertainment co-financed Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice (among dozens of other Warner Bros. titles). “I think it’s the destruction of our business. I have such respect and admiration for film criticism. When I was growing up film criticism was a real art. And there was intellect that went into that. And you would read Pauline’s Kael’s reviews, or some others, and that doesn’t exist anymore. Now it’s about a number. A compounded number of how many positives vs. negatives. Now it’s about, ‘What’s your Rotten Tomatoes score?’ And that’s sad, because the Rotten Tomatoes score was so low on Batman v Superman I think it put a cloud over a movie that was incredibly successful.”

Directed by Zack Snyder, Batman v Superman cost about $250 million to make and grossed nearly $900 million worldwide — despite being considered a disappointment (with a 27 percent score on Rotten Tomatoes).

“People don’t realize what goes into making a movie like that,” Ratner continued. “It’s mind-blowing. It’s just insane, it’s hurting the business, it’s getting people to not see a movie. In Middle America it’s, ‘Oh, it’s a low Rotten Tomatoes score so I’m not going to go see it because it must suck.’ But that number is an aggregate and one that nobody can figure out exactly what it means, and it’s not always correct. I’ve seen some great movies with really abysmal Rotten Tomatoes scores. What’s sad is film criticism has disappeared. It’s really sad.”

EW reached out to Rotten Tomatoes about Ratner’s thoughts, and Jeff Voris gave us a statement in reply — and it’s not as contrarian to the director’s stance as you might expect. “At Rotten Tomatoes, we completely agree that film criticism is valuable and important, and we’re making it easier than it has ever been for fans to access potentially hundreds of professional reviews for a given film or TV show in one place,” Voris wrote. “The Tomatometer score, which is the percentage of positive reviews published by professional critics, has become a useful decision-making tool for fans, but we believe it’s just a starting point for them to begin discussing, debating and sharing their own opinions.”

http://ew.com/movies/2017/03/23/ratner-tomatoes-scores/?xid=entertainment-weekly_socialflow_twitter
________________________________




Update: February 25, 2017

BATMAN V SUPERMAN and HILARY'S AMERICA Top Winners at 2017 Razzie Awards


XwlV7wX.png


WORST PICTURE
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
Dirty Grandpa
Gods of Egypt
Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party (WINNER)
Independence Day: Resurgence
Zoolander No. 2

WORST ACTOR
Ben Affleck, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
Gerard Butler, Gods of Egypt & London Has Fallen
Henry Cavill, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
Robert De Niro, Dirty Grandpa
Dinesh D'Souza (as himself), Hillary's America (WINNER)
Ben Stiller, Zoolander No. 2

WORST ACTRESS
Megan Fox, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows
Tyler Perry, BOO! A Medea Halloween
Julia Roberts, Mother's Day
Becky Turner (as Hillary Clinton), Hillary's America (WINNER)
Naomi Watts, Divergent Series: Allegiant & Shut-In
Shailene Woodley, Divergent Series: Allegiant

WORST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Julianne Hough, Dirty Grandpa
Kate Hudson, Mother's Day
Aubrey Plaza, Dirty Grandpa
Jane Seymour, Fifty Shades of Black
Sela Ward, Independence Day: Resurgence
Kristen Wiig, Zoolander No. 2 (WINNER)

WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Nicolas Cage, Snowden
Johnny Depp, Alice Through the Looking Glass
Will Ferrell, Zoolander No. 2
Jesse Eisenberg, Batman v Superman (WINNER)
Jared Leto, Suicide Squad
Owen Wilson, Zoolander No. 2

WORST SCREEN COMBO
Ben Affleck & His BFF (Baddest Foe Forever) Henry Cavill, Batman v Superman (WINNER)
Any 2 Egyptian Gods or Mortals, Gods of Egypt
Johnny Depp & His Vomitously Vibrant Costume, Alice Through the Looking Glass
The Entire Cast of Once Respected Actors, Collateral Beauty
Tyler Perry & That Same Old Worn Out Wig, BOO! A Medea Halloween
Ben Stiller and His BFF (Barely Funny Friend) Owen Wilson, Zoolander No. 2

WORST DIRECTOR
Dinesh D'Souza and Bruce Schooley, Hillary's America (WINNER)
Roland Emmerich, Independence Day: Resurgence
Tyler Perry, BOO! A Medea Halloween
Alex Proyas, Gods of Egypt
Zack Snyder, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
Ben Stiller, Zoolander No. 2

WORST SCREENPLAY
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (WINNER)
Dirty Grandpa
Gods of Egypt
Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party
Independence Day: Resurgence
Suicide Squad

WORST PREQUEL, REMAKE, RIP-OFF or SEQUEL
Alice Through the Looking Glass
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (WINNER)
Fifty Shades of Black
Independence Day: Resurgence
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows

RAZZIE REDEEMER AWARD
2014 Worst Supporting Actor nominee Mel Gibson, for his Oscar-nominated direction of Hacksaw Ridge

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/li...nominations-announced-worst-screenplay-966672
 
Last edited:
Update: September 6, 2016

Mel Gibson Calls BATMAN V SUPERMAN a "Piece of Shit"


LfNvvdb.jpg


After Hacksaw Ridge received a standing ovation at the Venice Film Festival, Deadline caught up with Mel Gibson to ask for his thoughts on the current state of Hollywood, and he didn't hold back when it came to his thoughts on blockbusters.

"I look at them and scratch my head. I’m really baffled by it. I think there’s a lot of waste but maybe if I did one of those things with the green screens I’d find out different. I don’t know. Maybe they do cost that much. I don’t know. It seems to me that you could do it for less. If you’re spending outrageous amounts of money, $180 million or more, I don’t know how you make it back after the tax man gets you, and after you give half to the exhibitors. What did they spend on ‘Batman v Superman’ that they’re admitting to? And it’s a piece of shit."

"I’m not interested in the stuff," Gibson says. "Do you know what the difference between real superheroes and comic book superheroes is? Real superheroes didn’t wear spandex. So I don’t know. Spandex must cost a lot."

Mel Gibson Calls Batman v Superman "A Piece Of Shit"; Confirms Lack Of Interest In Superhero Movies
________________________________




Update: July 19, 2016

Watch the Honest Trailer for BATMAN V SUPERMAN



________________________________




Update: June 18, 2016

BATMAN V SUPERMAN Ends U.S. Box Office Run with $330 Million


mBEZ4aG.jpg


DC's embattled Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has finally bowed in North America, and has concluded its domestic run with $330,360,194 million in box office.

Box Office Mojo Editor Gitesh Pandya released the number on his Twitter account, with the caption: "NorthAmerican #boxoffice reporting on #BatmanvSuperman is now final. Domestic run finished at $330,360,194. 50% was from opening wknd."

The film pulled in a worldwide tally of $872,662,631 million, but as Pandya noted, most of its domestic money was made in its opening week.

The movie did not leave the best impression with critics or general audiences, and stalled out early in its run. For a movie that cost so much to make when you take into account its original budget, reshoots, and marketing, it only made a relatively small profit.

Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice Finishes Box Office Run With $330 Million
________________________________




Update: June 1, 2016

Trailer for BATMAN V SUPERMAN Ultimate Edition Teases New Footage for Extended Cut


27392453786_2b28ce01d7_o.jpg


Collider exclusively premieres the trailer for the extended Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Ultimate Edition, along with details on the Blu-ray and Digital HD releases of director Zack Snyder’s superhero smackdown. The Ultimate Edition—which features 30 minutes of new footage incorporated into an extended, R-rated cut of the film—will be available early on Digital HD on June 28th along with the theatrical version of the movie, and both will be available to purchase on Blu-ray Combo Pack, DVD, and Ultra HD Blu-ray on July 19th.

As previously reported, the extended cut not only features brand new footage, but also entirely new characters that didn’t appear in the theatrical cut of the film, like Jena Malone’s mystery role. It runs 182 minutes in length and is Rated R for sequences of violence. The Ultra HD Blu-ray Combo Pack, Blu-ray Combo Pack, and Blu-ray 3D Combo Pack all feature both the theatrical and Ultimate Edition versions, while the DVD only includes the theatrical version of the film.

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice—both the theatrical and Ultimate Edition extended cut—will be available on Digital HD starting June 28th, followed by the physical release on July 19th.



Exclusive: ‘Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice’ Ultimate Edition Trailer and Blu-ray Details
 
Last edited:
Update: June 1, 2016

WATCHMEN Co-Creator Dave Gibbons Slams BATMAN V SUPERMAN


ylPWetz.jpg


Dave Gibbons: "I feel that what is happening now with the DC characters in film, to my mind, is going in the wrong direction... What Marvel has seemed to have done is take their characters, with a dark side and a light side, and their humor and their pathos, and their human emotion, and they actually have a long vision of what they're going to do. They put together films that are really entertaining, that are exciting, that do have threat and jeopardy, but have humor and a human quality to it, and a sense of hope.

But I feel what DC has done particularly with the Superman vs. Batman movie is they really have taken a misstep on it. I mean, I wrote a comic book called 'World's Finest', which was Superman vs. Batman, and what I homed in, and I am not saying this is the only take, but it might have helped, was you have Batman who is a dark hidden creature who lives in a dark evil city whose antagonist is a brightly colored clown. You got Superman who is a brightly colored figure, the yang if you like to Batman's yin, he lives in a bright hopeful city, but with a villain, an opponent, who is a dark grey scheming business man. So the whole universe's are completely complimentary.

When I wrote my story, I got a lot of mileage out of crossing those over, and it turned out Luthor went to Gotham, and the Joker went to Metropolis, and the Joker wanted to black out Metropolis, and Luthor wanted to set Gotham on fire. So to me if you are doing Superman vs. Batman, the first thing, which is implied by the "vs," is there has to be a difference, and I think where the latest film suffered was because they were both these dark opaque angsty creatures.

I thought, I have to say that Ben Affleck's Batman was brilliant. I thought if he'd been in a Batman film on his own... I also think DC sort of lost their nerve because Superman Vs. Batman, which is basically Frank Miller's Dark Knight story, is enough for a movie without putting Doomsday in it, which is another complete Superman movie, without shoehorning The Flash and the Cyborg, and without Wonder Woman, she's a movie in her own right." It's a harsh analysis, but Gibbons' words don't fall too far with what a lot of critics and fans have critiqued about the film to begin with.

Perhaps at the moment, I'm less than 100% thrilled with DC. I'm certainly not coming down on Zack, but to my taste, they kind of missed the [inaudible] there. I think also Marvel have been really bold. They introduced the characters slowly, so when they put them all in a movie together, it gave me that same thrill as I had when a kid when they put all the characters into the Avengers. 'Wow! They're all in one comic!' And the latest Captain America [Civil War] movie, the bit when the two teams run toward each other with all their powers blazing was just 'Oh! Yeah! This is what comics are all about!' I think Marvel have done it with verve and wit. DC kind of missed out on that."



Watchmen Co-Creator Dave Gibbons Slams Batman v Superman and Praises Captain America: Civil War
_________________________________




Update: May 28, 2016

Jeremy Irons Says BATMAN V SUPERMAN Deserved Its Bad Reviews


igyktev.jpg


Speaking with the Daily Mail, Jeremy Irons minced no words in talking about the poor reviews for the Zack Snyder-helmed superhero smackdown, saying he found the less-than-glowing critical response to be warranted:

‘Deservedly so. I mean it took $800 million, so the kicking didn’t matter but it was sort of overstuffed…It was very muddled. I think the next one will be simpler. The script is certainly a lot smaller, it’s more linear.”

That “next one” is the currently filming Justice League Part One, which Snyder is directing but which is being watched ever-closely by the media and Warner Bros. alike. Indeed, the studio has been doing some major course-correction in the wake ofBvS, from upping Ben Affleck to an executive producer to setting an official head of DC Films to scaling back the roles of those that have been intimately involved in the crafting of the DC Extended Universe thus far. So while Irons’ words may be a bit harsh coming from someone who was in the movie and will be part of the universe for some time to come, it’s not as if the studio is pretending that everything is hunky dory.

Jeremy Irons Says 'Batman v Superman' Was "Overstuffed," "Muddled" and Deserved Its Bad Reviews
 
Last edited:
Update: May 24, 2016

Charles Roven No Longer Producing All DC Movies Due to BATMAN V SUPERMAN Fallout


LWplzED.jpg


Charles Roven, the veteran producer who has worked on every DC Comics movie at Warner Bros. since 2005’s Batman Begins, is no longer producing certain DC movies, sources tell The Hollywood Reporter.

Talks are underway to have Roven — who was a producer on Zack Snyder's Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, as well as the recently completed Suicide Squad and next year's Wonder Woman — segue to a different role going forward, likely that of an executive producer who is not involved in day-to-day production. However, he potentially could continue to be a producer on some sequels to the movies he's currently producing.

The extent of Roven's involvement, and which titles he would work on, is "evolving," according to multiple sources, who also stress that no final decisions have been made.

Warners, which leverages its DC IP across multiple channels, among them publishing and video games, now is taking steps to course-correct its approach as it develops its superhero slate. It recently shuffled its executive ranks to have executive vp Jon Berg and Geoff Johns, DC's chief content officer, co-run the newly created DC Films. It also is seeking to hire a more established director on The Flash (2018) after parting ways with screenwriter Seth Grahame-Smith, who initially was attached to make his directorial debut with the project.

Roven is part of the unofficial brain trust with Snyder on the DC movies, an approach Warners seems to be rethinking in the wake of BvS's less than stellar performance.

One reason for the shift in thinking is that Warners wants to ramp up the number of DC productions, and sources say it would be physically impossible for one man to handle pre-, post- and production on multiple movies in countries and cities ranging from Australia to Los Angeles to Louisiana to London.

Roven was slated to be a producer on Flash and Aquaman, two DC films that have yet to go into production and could end up shooting on opposite ends of the planet. Sources tell THR he will no longer serve in that capacity on those films.

Roven remains on set for Justice League: Part 1, currently shooting in London, although Warners now has sent Berg to also oversee the day-to-day production of that movie.

The move comes as Warner Bros. continues to scrutinize its DC movies in the wake of BvS’s so-so performance at the box office and chilly reception from audiences. The movie, released March 25, wrapped its run with $871 million worldwide with a production budget of at least $300 million. While Warners insists the movie will be profitable, it was meant to kick off the studio’s DC cinematic universe with a billion-dollar bang, but instead was met with an unenthusiastic response from fans

'Batman v Superman' Fallout: Producer Charles Roven to Shift Role on DC Movies (Exclusive)
 
Last edited:
Update: May 18, 2016

Warner Bros. Creates DC Films Division Due to BATMAN V SUPERMAN Fallout


3QOX3uO.jpg


The fallout from Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice continues to ripple through Warner Bros.

The Burbank-based studio is making changes to the way it handles its DC Entertainment-centered films, giving oversight of the feature projects to a pair of executives and creating a dedicated division for the films. Current executive vp Jon Berg and Geoff Johns, DC's chief content officer who successfully launched the comics label's foray into television, will co-run the newly created DC Films, according to multiple sources.

This move is part of a broader refinement of executive roles at Warners, which has suffered a disappointing run of movies and has vexed producers and filmmakers, some of whom complain about a murky greenlight process.

Now, instead of a broad range of movies to oversee, executives will be charged with managing “genre streams" while reporting to Warner Bros. Pictures president Greg Silverman. In many cases, these streams formalize interests and specialties for specific executives. Courtenay Valenti, for example, will now oversee all Lego projects as well as the Harry Potter line that begins with November's Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. Senior production execs Jesse Ehrman and Niija Kuykendall will focus more on comedy/family and sci-fi/action, respectively, according to sources.

Johns will still report to DC Entertainment president Diane Nelson, while Berg will report to Silverman.

With Berg and Johns, Warner Bros. is attempting to unify the disparate elements of the DC movies with a seasoned film exec and a comics veteran that together hopefully can emulate the way Marvel Studios has produced its films under the vision of president Kevin Feige. But sources also say Warners still wants to remain a filmmaker-driven studio. As part of their new jobs, Berg and Johns will become producers on the Justice League movies.

The muted reception of BvS, from a box-office and critical point of view, is the flashpoint for the changes. The studio had high hopes for the movie, which pitted its top heroes against each other. The door was opened for director Zack Snyder to be involved in shaping the look and content of the entire DC line, which is scheduled through 2020. But critics and fans ripped into the first pic and especially Snyder for perceived missteps, including its heroes' unheroic behavior and the dark tone. BvS, which cost at least $300 million to make, has grossed less than $870 million worldwide since its March 25 release. Warners has said the film will be profitable but it was hardly the home run the studio had wanted.

Geoff Johns was more than willing to talk about where he thinks the DC brand needs to go. One phrase came out of his mouth over and over again: “hope and optimism.” It’s crystal clear that his vision for DC looks a lot brighter than the much-maligned grimness Zack Snyder provided earlier this year.

'Batman v. Superman' Fallout: Warner Bros. Shakes Up Executive Roles (Exclusive)
________________________________





Update: May 3, 2016

How BATMAN V SUPERMAN Should Have Ended and Nostalgia Critic




 
Last edited:
Update: May 6, 2016

Ben Affleck Reportedly "Unhappy" and "Humiliated" with BATMAN V SUPERMAN Reception


lY1YUPk.jpg


As Civil War hits theaters and flies its way to the kind of box office Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice should have earned without much trouble, things continue to reshuffle at Warner Bros. As reported earlier, Ben Affleck has become executive producer on the already-filming Justice League movie.

Affleck and writer Chris Terrio are going to shape up the script to make sure it’s something people might actually want to see. Once filming is complete, Affleck will have some say in post-production concerns. This means Affleck is now creatively involved in the film on a very real level.

Birth.Movies.Death's sources say that Affleck was incredibly unhappy about the reception of BvS. He felt humiliated after spending so much of the press tour saying how much better this film would be than Daredevil. On top of that his agent was furious when Kevin Tsujihara jumped the gun and announced him as the director of The Batman standalone movie when the negotiations were still ongoing.

8Tb75q5.jpg


This executive producer move seems to help placate Affleck while also edging Zack Snyder out of a controlling central position in the DC Movieverse, according to sources.

This is just the latest step in an ongoing shakeup at Warner Bros in response to Batman v Superman’s poor reception. While it’s certainly fascinating to see played out in public like this, the bottom line is a hope that these movies will actually get good. With the help of Affleck, an honestly talented filmmaker, that comes closer to being a reality.

Ben Affleck "Incredibly Unhappy" and "Humiliated" with Batman v Superman Reception
________________________________





Update: April 22, 2016

How BATMAN V SUPERMAN Helped CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR Get Made


Utgh19m.jpg


Civil War Co-director Joe Russo: "Well, it helps that we're working within a very popular genre. But I also think social media has altered viewing habits and tastes. The quality of tentpole movies has gotten very good and very competitive over the last couple years. Because of social media and the discussion that happens there, the audience has gotten a stronger collective sense of taste and you're dead at 6 p.m. on Friday if you didn't make a good movie. And they're starting to champion more radical storytelling.

Deadpool's a great example of that. I mean, holy shit, $750 million worldwide? For our part, when we finished Winter Soldier two years ago and we were thinking about doing the next one, the only thing that seemed interesting to us was to deconstruct the Marvel Universe — because where else can we go at this point? There have been 11 or 12 movies so far, all with a fairly traditional structure.

Our pitch to them was: People will tell you they love chocolate ice cream — until you give it to them five days a week. It's time to give them some rainbow sherbet. Kevin [Feige] is a maverick and he's very sensitive to how people are responding to his content. He said he thought we might be right. And after they announced Batman v. Superman, he said, 'you guys are absolutely right.' We needed to do something challenging with the material or we were going to start to lose the audience."

'Captain America: Civil War' Director Joe Russo on the Film Industry's Chinese Future (Q&A)
________________________________




Update: April 8, 2016

Zack Snyder Reveals BATMAN V SUPERMAN Deleted Scene Addresses Martha Kent's Kidnapping


gVdxQbv.jpg


During an interview with the Batman v Superman director Zack Snyder, IGN asked why Superman can’t hear his mother’s screams and cries for help when she’s kidnapped by Lex Luthor late on.

“I think all the way – to me, from Metropolis to Smallville is probably just on the edge of his range of hearing” Snyder explained. “Also the clutter of the city makes it difficult as well."

"We had a scene that we cut from the movie where he tries to look for her when he finds out that Lex has got her," Snyder continued. "It was a slightly dark scene that we cut out because it sort of represented this dark side. Because when he was looking for his mom he heard all the cries of all the potential crimes going on in the city, you know when you look.

“I kind of like the idea that he’s taught himself not to look because if he looks it’s just neverending, right? You have to know when, as Superman, when to intervene and when not to. Or not when not to, you can’t be everywhere at once, literally you can’t be everywhere at once, so he has to be really selective in a weird way about where he chooses to interfere.”

The key to the character of Superman is that he is overwhelmed by the feeling of not being able to save everyone. Snyder saying the character just “turns it off” is kinda weird and, to be frank, a little cold. Superman Returns dealt with this issue pretty wonderfully, so it’s not impossible to tackle and actually provides some depth to the character, but as we’ve seen in Man of Steel and Batman v Superman, this iteration of the character really only cares about Martha Kent and Lois Lane, while saving bystanders is kind of treated as an extracurricular activity.

‘Batman v Superman’: Zack Snyder Reveals a Deleted Scene He Cut for Being Too Dark
 
Last edited:
Update: April 3, 2016

BATMAN V SUPERMAN Plunges 69 Percent in Second Weekend to $51.8 Million


Batman-v-Superman-Heat-Vision-Dragonlord.jpg


Zack Snyder's Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice plunged an estimated 69 percent in its second weekend — one of the biggest drops in history for a marquee superhero title — even as it easily stayed No. 1.

Final numbers show the Warner Bros. title earning $51.8 million from 4,256 theaters for a domestic total of $260.9 million. Dismal reviews and a B CinemaScore are no doubt catching up with the superhero smackdown.

Heading into the weekend, some analysts thought BvS would pull in north of $60 million, considering it had little competition (no new major studio title opened nationwide). Warners and Snyder have plenty riding on BvS, which launches the DC cinematic universe, including two Justice League movies — the first of which Snyder is presently shooting — and this summer's Suicide Squad.

BvS is also seeing big drops in some key international markets. Overall, the movie fell 67 percent internationally to $85.3 million from 67 markets for a foreign total of $422.5million and a global haul of $683.4 million. BvS has slowed dramatically in China, where it was beaten by Zootopia this weekend. It has earned $85 million in the Middle Kingdom to date.

Among other superhero movies, Avengers: Age of Ultron fell 59 percent in its second weekend and The Dark Knight, 53 percent. The only major studio superhero movie to see a decline approaching 70 percent was X-Men Origins: The Wolverine, which fell 69 percent in its second outing. Snyder's Man of Steel dipped 65 percent.

Box Office: 'Batman v. Superman' Plunges 69 Percent in Second Weekend to $51.8M
________________________________





Update: March 28, 2016

Zack Snyder Confirms Cyborg Mother Box Origin Scene in BATMAN V SUPERMAN


Cyborg.jpg


During Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice's opening weekend, hardcore comic book fans were pretty sure they knew what it was Silas Stone used to transform his dismembered and dying son into the being we will all come to know as Cyborg in next year's Justice League Part One.

Casual fans, of course, were likely baffled, as the mysterious, moving box wasn't named or explained, other than to say it was an alien artifact.

Well, Batman V Superman and Justice League director Zack Snyder has now confirmed that the item fans saw in that scene was indeed a Mother Box.

“That’s the first glimpse of the Mother Box there,” Snyder told EW of Cyborg's origin, which was glimpsed briefly in Batman V Superman. “It was an agonizing birth.”

It seems likely that we'll soon start to learn much more about how Jack Kirby's Fourth World plays into the film; the Knightmare sequence featured Parademons, Cyborg's origin featured a Mother Box, and a deleted scene released earlier today featured what looks like either Steppenwolf or Yuga Khan, both emissaries of Darkseid, ruler of Apokolips.

PING! PING! Batman V Superman Director Confirms The Nature of Cyborg's Origin
________________________________





Update: March 28, 2016

Deleted Scene from BATMAN V SUPERMAN Hints at the New Gods


Batman-v-Superman-Deleted-Communion-Scene-Dragonlord.jpg


(Spoilers) A new deleted scene from Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice has just been released to the official Warner Bros. YouTube account -- and it appears to give some insight into that last scene between Lex Luthor and Batman.

In the scene, Lex is taking his Kryptonian history lesson on board the crashed Scout Ship from Man of Steel when a group of soldiers set upon him. If you've seen the movie, you know that those soldiers are never heard from again, but Lex is...!

What's more interesting, though, is a demonic figure -- possibly Darkseid's minion Steppenwolf or Darkseid's father Yuga Khan -- surrounded by large squares that appear to resemble the Mother Box from Silas Stone's S.T.A.R. Labs video.

Could this be where Lex Luthor learns about the Fourth World, the New Gods, and the idea that Darkseid is on his way to Earth?



Batman V Superman Deleted Scene Seems to Hint at The New Gods
 
Last edited:
Update: March 28, 2016

BATMAN V SUPERMAN Sets Record for Worst Friday-Sunday Drop for a Superhero Movie


Batman-v-Superman-Lex-Luthor-102015-Dragonlord.jpg


According to Forbes, Batman v Superman has set a new record for the worst Friday-to-Sunday drop for a superhero movie release in modern North American box office history.

In dropping 55% from its $82 million Friday debut to its $37 million gross on Sunday, it pummeled all prior records for weakness in theatrical staying power. It even beat the nearly universally reviled and now long-forgotten Fantastic Four reboot, which dropped a comparatively modest 48% across its opening weekend in the summer of 2015.

You might be thinking that Sunday was the Easter holiday, which could account for the big Sunday drop. But that still wouldn’t explain the Friday-to-Saturday decline of 38%, which was the second worst opening Friday-to-Saturday drop in the annals of superhero releases, after a 40% dip for The Dark Knight Rises.

The steep decline in the Batman v Superman numbers points to the unfortunate likelihood that, apart from DC Comics fans, North American audiences don’t like the movie very much. This is problematic for Warner Bros in two critically important ways. First, if the picture’s audience evaporates too quickly its chances for reaching profitability will be threatened.

Second, the studio’s management has elected to hire the same creative team that made Batman v Superman to oversee the franchise’s future inter-connected pictures. If mainstream audiences aren’t enamored of the flagship film, it’s going to be a major challenge to win them back.

'Batman v Superman' Sets Record With Worst Friday-Sunday Drop For A Superhero Pic
________________________________





Update: March 27, 2016

BATMAN V SUPERMAN Smashes Records with $166.1M U.S. Debut and $420.1M Globally


Batman-v-Superman-Blocked-Punch-Dragonlord.jpg


In a much-needed win for Warner Bros., Zack Snyder's Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice opened to a massive $166.1 million from 4,242 theaters, a defining moment in DC Entertainment's battle to compete with Marvel's superhero universe. It also helped deliver the biggest Easter weekend in history, up 13.5 percent over last year's record level, which was fueled by Furious 7.

On Sunday, Warners put the movie's opening at $170.1 million, but traffic slowed on Sunday. Instead of being the No. 6 opening of all time, it is the No. 7, although it remains the fourth-best launch of all time for a superhero film behind a trio of Marvel titles: The Avengers ($207.4 million), Avengers: Age of Ultron ($191.3 million) and Iron Man 3 ($174.1 million), not accounting for inflation.

Had the $170.1 million held, BvS would have marked the biggest opening in history for Warners, beating the final Harry Potter film ($169 million). On Sunday, the studio highlighted this fact in a press release listing the movie's numerous accomplishments, many of which still hold.

Batman v Superman also made history globally with $420.1 million, the No. 4 worldwide bow of all time behind Star Wars: The Force Awakens ($529 million), Jurassic World ($524.9 million) and the final Harry Potter film ($483.2 million). The movie benefited mightily from opening day-and-date everywhere, including in China, where it amassed $57.3 million. Its international take was $254 million, the biggest for any superhero pic.

The previous biggest superhero opening was The Avengers, with a global bow of $392.5 million (that film didn't have the advantage of opening everywhere at the same time). In terms of China, Avengers: Age of Ultron still easily holds the crown with a debut of $155.8 million two weeks after the sequel opened in North America.

Batman v Superman's mega-performance is all the more impressive considering it earned dismal notices and a mediocre B CinemaScore. The previous best domestic opening for a DC Entertainment film was Christopher Nolan's final Batman films, The Dark Knight Rises, which debuted to $160.9 million in summer 2012.

Box Office: 'Batman v Superman' Launches DC Superhero Universe With Record $166.1M U.S. Debut
________________________________





Critics' Reviews for BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE

Rotten Tomatoes: 29% Approval Rating (88 out of 301 critics like it)

Critics Consensus: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice smothers a potentially powerful story -- and some of America's most iconic superheroes -- in a grim whirlwind of effects-driven action.

batman-v-superman-justice-league-slice.jpg


Entertainment Weekly - Dawn of Justice starts off as an intriguing meditation about two superheroes turning to an all-too-human emotion: hatred out of fear of the unknown. Two and a half hours later it winds up somewhere very far from that—but at the same time, all too familiar. It's another numbing smash-and-bash orgy of CGI mayhem. C+

Newark Star-Ledger - But although director Zac Snyder is a great visualist, all he has here is pretty pictures and giant (and confusing) action sequences. The film meanders along, playing less like a prequel for the JLA than a greatest-hits medley of every superhero movie ever made. 2/4

Newsday - Overlong, underdeveloped and almost entirely humorless, “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice” may please die-hard fans by pitting two DC icons against each other. Everyone else may want to wait for the next Marvel movie. 1.5/4

Rolling Stone - Snyder, juiced up by Hans Zimmer's caffeinated score, throws everything at the screen until resistance is futile. Better than Man of Steel but below the high bar set by Nolan's Dark Knight, Dawn of Justice is still a colossus, the stuff that DC Comics dreams are made of for that kid in all of us who yearns to see Batman and Superman suit up and go in for the kill. 3/4

James Berardinelli - For those who thought Man of Steel was dark, you ain’t seen nothing yet. Batman v Superman, the battle royale/team-up of DC Comics’ revered superheroes, is so bleak that the sun never seems to shine, the characters’ faces can’t form smiles, and the whole affair is more depressing than fun. 2.5/4

 
Last edited:
Update: February 17, 2016

Rumor: Warner Bros. "Nervous" About BATMAN V SUPERMAN After Screening

Batman-v-Superman-021716-Dragonlord.jpg


For the past few days, there've been lots of murmurs going around regarding the fact that Warner Bros and DC are starting to get really worried about their upcoming slate of DC films. Why is that? According to Drew McWeeny from HitFix, it's all related to the response the film has been receiving in test screenings.

From Latino-Review's sources, the term "worried" is a mischaracterization. They're not worried, per sé. What they are is nervous, and that's to be expected. After all, there is a lot riding on Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Not only is the fate of an entire slate of DC films hanging in the balance of whether or not this movie hits, but the very definition of "hit" is now coming into question.

The budget for the film, with promotion included, has reportedly ballooned to north of $400 million. So for the movie to be considered a monster success- which the studio needs it to be- and for it to open the floodgates for the rest of the proposed slate, it would need to make north of a billion. The problem is, according to a well-connected source who spoke with LR on a condition of anonymity, the film could be as polarizing as Man of Steel.

To be clear, the source loved Man of Steel. And he's seen Batman v Superman, and he really liked it, too. But he also recalls how that MoS came out and split audiences and critics alike. It wasn't the kind of universal crowd-pleaser that DC wanted then, and that trend may very well continue with BvS.

Again, this isn't to say that the film is bad. Not at all. But it's not for everyone, and that's making the suits nervous, as there's a lot riding on this film and they'd rather it have turned out more accessible.

The idea to include Batman wasn't pre-planned. In fact, the whole Batman Vs Superman angle wasn't cooked up until well after Man of Steel had come out, and it's been said that they didn't decide to include Batman in the film until three days before they announced it at Comic Con. So bringing in The Dark Knight was an impulsive move, and one that was likely aided by the fact that DC knows that audiences love them some Batman.

The one recurring theme coming out of these test screenings, dating back to December, is that Ben Affleck's Batman is the highlight of the film.

But while McWeeny claims this could mean that his solo Batman flick could take the spot of Justice League, as the studio retools the team-up movie and shines a spotlight on the Snyder-less Batman flick, Latino Review's source says that Justice League is absolutely happening next, and that Affleck's solo film will not take its place. Production on JL is ramping up as we speak, and the thought is that they'll start filming after all of the actors are done promoting Batman v Superman. This also contradicts the idea that Snyder might not direct it.

The LR Scoop On The Apparent Turmoil At DC FILMS Over Batman V Superman
________________________________





Update: February 12, 2016

Rumor: Warner Bros. Worried About Their DC Cinematic Universe?

Justice-League-Fan-Art-021216-Dragonlord.jpg


Hitfix’s Drew McWeeny sat down with Roth Cornet to talk about the last trailer for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, and conversation turned to what his sources told him about Warner Bros.’ attitude about the film in particular and the shared DC Cinematic Universe in general.

McWeeny says that Batman v Superman is starting to scare Warner Bros., that the advance response hasn’t been as good as the studio had expected and they are worried.

Warners needs to film to make over $1 billion for the studio to not only make its money back but also to support the rest of the announced films in the DC Cinematic Universe. The response they are getting from test screenings tells them that is not going to happen.

McWeeny bets that Justice League does not start production when it is scheduled, and Zack Snyder will not be at the helm of it when it does.

He also believes Warners will do everything to move Ben Affleck's The Batman solo movie up to take Justice League‘s place, believing that film would act as a better lead in to the team up flick than BvS and a better opportunity to “gain people back” onboard for the rest of the slate.

[Update: Zack Snyder’s Justice League — Part 1 is officially a go at Warner Bros. and will begin filming on April 11, a little over two weeks after the release of Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice, the director and studio tell EW.]



Is Warner Bros. Giving Up on Its DC Cinematic Universe?
________________________________





Update: August 26, 2014

Does Warner Bros. Have a No Joke Policy in Their DC Films?


Man-of-Steel-Cuffs-0128b-Dragonlord.jpg


HitFlix's Drew McWeeny: "'No jokes.' Last week was about the fifth time I've heard that there is a mandate at Warner Bros. regarding any of the DC superhero films in development, and it's very simple and direct and to the point. 'No jokes.'

It would seem like a crazy rule to set for an entire series of films. Not according to Warner/DC. Not after Green Lantern. One thing you'd have to grant Green Lantern, whatever your feelings about it as a movie, is that they've got lots of jokes in that movie. Something has caused this shift in the overall editorial voice of the DC superhero movies. There's got to be a point behind an edict as broad and as specific as that.

DC is going to try for some big characters with Batman and Wonder Woman and The Flash and Cyborg and Aquaman, and one thing that's always seemed true to me of DC comics versus Marvel is tone. DC treats their superhero characters more like gods, fighting battles that we simply can't comprehend or participate in because of our natures. Marvel characters are more flawed, more human, struggling to live human lives while still dealing with their powers and their responsibility to the world.

But if 'No Jokes' is a reaction to Green Lantern, an edict that comes from a desire to simply do things differently from Marvel, it could really paint DC's movies into a corner, and I would imagine that it's giving some filmmakers pause in considering whether or not they'd want to make a DC movie.

So I'm going to put the question out there, and as we all talk to Zack Snyder or David Goyer or any of the actors working on these characters, I'd love to hear an answer, a firm denial. Is it true? Is DC really so gun-shy that they've laid this rule down for all of their films? Is it really a 'No Jokes' future we have to look forward to? And if so, do you think Marvel feels like they've already won in terms of audience sympathy if this is really how things are supposed to move forward?"

Read more at http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captur...arvel-the-big-screen-edge#Cu2f77SwDbRSuf82.99
 
Last edited:
Great directors have their rough spots , but I don't see Snyder as a great Director. As for the Lord of the Rings and Peter Jackson , that trilogy has a special place in my heart because that the last set of movies I saw with my family before a key loved one died so those movies are untouchable and I forgive Jackson for damn near everything, even the Prequel Series and the Lovely Bones

The lovely bones was one of the stupidest movies I've ever seen. When they were doing that alternate world shit I was literally looking at my GF saying WTF is going on here.
 
LOL becoming one of the horde with group think is what you base your opinion on (if the general audience loves it, it must be great).
And yet I never read a single review before going to see it.

You seem to have nothing to say when not projecting.
 
I've addressed the lack of great films by Snyder before, what if Kubrick was judged by Fear and Desire? MoS was Snyder coming into his own as an auteur, BvS continued that trend

MOS was pretty good to me. I liked it and I was excited for this new superman after watching it. BVS wasn't done well at all the main issue was trying to cram two major DC stories into one and it didn't work. The Doomsday story should have been it's own thing on Supermans next solo film not crammed into BVS. They removed all the emotion from the death of superman and made it meaningless on top of showing us that he might still be alive at the end.
 
Not sure what you think quoting that proves as it proves nothing.

It is one guy projecting and trying to speak for why others did not like it.

Your opinion proves nothing as well. General Audiences loved Diary of a Mad Black Woman, I bet you will appeal to them as well and say it must be a great movie. GA also hated Cocoon by your logic that is a crap movie since 90% of the audience hated it upon its' release.
 
The lovely bones was one of the stupidest movies I've ever seen. When they were doing that alternate world shit I was literally looking at my GF saying WTF is going on here.
I forgive him for that garbage
 
MOS was pretty good to me. I liked it and I was excited for this new superman after watching it. BVS wasn't done well at all the main issue was trying to cram two major DC stories into one and it didn't work. The Doomsday story should have been it's own thing on Supermans next solo film not crammed into BVS. They removed all the emotion from the death of superman and made it meaningless on top of showing us that he might still be alive at the end.

I have the exact opposite opinion, Doomsday is a mindless brute him being the central villain in a solo Superman film would make a superficial arc. The Death of Superman is Snyder reclaiming the Superman mythos after deconstructing it, he is now the hope we see from the Donner flicks through his redemption of Batman.
 
I have the exact opposite opinion, Doomsday is a mindless brute him being the central villain in a solo Superman film would make a superficial arc. The Death of Superman is Snyder reclaiming the Superman mythos after deconstructing it, he is now the hope we see from the Donner flicks through his redemption of Batman.

I saw the Superman Doomsday cartoon and it was done way better then this. It had more emotion and more everything. If they actually put the whole storyline into one movie (Death of superman + superboy, man of steel) it would make for a great movie. It would have to be kind of long to really get it done right but it could be done and it would be awesome. BVS should have ended with Doomsday being born and then Superman fights him at the beginning of the movie and continue from there. Basically just follow the comic books they got it done right a long time ago.
 
Your opinion proves nothing as well. General Audiences loved Diary of a Mad Black Woman, I bet you will appeal to them as well and say it must be a great movie. GA also hated Cocoon by your logic that is a crap movie since 90% of the audience hated it upon its' release.
You seem major defensive and I find that funny.

If you think McD's is the best food in the world you are entitled to that opinion and to stand alone trumpeting it and proclaiming it is misunderstood based on whatever logic you want.

No one is denying you your minority opinion. Just relax and go with it and accept that many of us just laugh at you over it. My friend who thinks Mc'D's is the greatest accepts his opinion and taste is in the minority and he is ok with it. You should be too.
 
You seem major defensive and I find that funny.

If you think McD's is the best food in the world you are entitled to that opinion and to stand alone trumpeting it and proclaiming it is misunderstood based on whatever logic you want.

No one is denying you your minority opinion. Just relax and go with it and accept that many of us just laugh at you over it. My friend who thinks Mc'D's is the greatest accepts his opinion and taste is in the minority and he is ok with it. You should be too.

The appeal to common belief fallacy strikes again.
 
Didn't like it at all. The characters were just not meshed well. Seemed glued together rather than seamless.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,620
Messages
58,305,627
Members
176,000
Latest member
Furigo94
Back
Top