- Joined
- Apr 30, 2015
- Messages
- 14,120
- Reaction score
- 13,694
I saw it on facebook.
I saw it on facebook.
I saw it on facebook.
I saw it on facebook.
Not bad. Keanu Reeves as Doctor Strange really sticks out as a poor choice though.
Not bad. Keanu Reeves as Doctor Strange really sticks out as a poor choice though.
I saw it on facebook.
Has this been posted yet? Pretty funny.
By the Eye of Agamott-WOAH!
![]()
Sheeeeit I'm a get too stoned for this movie and too stoned for the next one too, my dude! Up top!I think he'll get two stones in this movie and two stones in the next movie.
Or Hasselhoff.In the 90s Fury would have been played by Tom Selleck or Harrison Ford.
Selleck had no star power at all in t he 90s. Ford is a good choice and maybe ConneryIn the 90s Fury would have been played by Tom Selleck or Harrison Ford.
Sheeeeit I'm a get too stoned for this movie and too stoned for the next one too, my dude! Up top!
Does thanos back story make sense to anyone?
We don't know what it is yet, beyond Titan being destroyed. It seems implied that the cause of Thanos' home planet's destruction was over-population. Hence the Mad Titan wanting to wipe out half of all life in the universe to prevent the same thing happening again.
I know its fictional but theoretically speaking, how does wiping out half of life in the universe balance or prevent that?
Hopefully the movie has answers.
Im also assuming russos are going out of there way to explain some things that wont be in the movie to avoid any spoilers.
Does thanos back story make sense to anyone?
Boom. There it is. The only thing now is for the reviews to come out great and push it over the top.
Real people from history have had similar ideas.
Mao:
“If the worst came to the worst and half of mankind died, the other half would remain while imperialism would be razed to the ground"
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-mao-zedong-seemed-welcome-nuclear-holocaust-23648