- Joined
- Apr 18, 2007
- Messages
- 15,717
- Reaction score
- 868
It’s a terrible joke. You’re not missing anything.Who is Rick? I'm missing the joke
It’s a terrible joke. You’re not missing anything.Who is Rick? I'm missing the joke
Did Gamora and the vision die? Not necessarily. And Vision isn't a main character.
Infinity War writers just took a giant dump on pretty much everyone's idea that people are coming back. If they died they will remain dead no one's coming back.
Less clear is how they explain death. Gamora died but she did say she filmed scenes for Avengers 4. They said you will have to deal with the stages of grief an acceptance.
Check out the video with buzz feed story.
More info from Hollywood I mean Iowa?
https://www.press-citizen.com/story...oe-russo-iowa-city-opening-weekend/564667002/
The film did show both of them dying.
I don't know how Vision could be considered not a main character. He is one of the super heroes.
Yeah but it also showed Gamora alive in the soul gem.
And Vision is not a main character. This is the only movie where he actually had extensive dialogue
"I am Groot"
"I am Steve Rogers"
Did Gamora and the vision die? Not necessarily. And Vision isn't a main character.
Gamora wasn't just absorbed into the soul stone....she was thrown off a cliff. She is dead.
Her soul is in the stone, but she is dead.
Vision is an Avenger. And he was one of the holders of the infinity stones. He has played a major role in all 3 of the movies he's been in. (Shit, you could also say he's played a big part since the beginning since he was also technically Jarvis for Tony’s first suits)
Lol you are stuck on some pretty minute gripes. We didn't see Thor's flesh melt in a PG13 movie? Lol ok.... they showed it was burning his back and then him almost dying before he got the axe.
That scene with Gamora could be a number of things.
Vision is an Avenger and has been for three movies now. Whether or not you want to call him a main character he is still a big character to kill off.
"I am Groot"
"I am Steve Rogers"
Maybe you're referring to the stringent one-to-one depiction of events, because it's hard for me to agree they went against the nature of the source material.
Rather, they drilled down to whatever the creates thought where the core directives of each property and sought to bring their own cinematic sensibilities to it. X-MEN is about discrimination; that's what Singer's about. HULK is an epic tragedy; that's what Ang Lee put forth. BATMAN is about an adolescent fantasy; and that's what Nolan did, updating it to our man-child hard edges. The core ideologies were still there, from the comic, and then tailored to each director's style and taste.
Tonally speaking, I don't they fall into camp nor over-seriousness. They just don't work very well in certain places; there are gaps and speedbumps that aren't as present with the MCU. Which isn't to say the MCU isn't without its faults either. Just different speedbumps.