• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

International Australia Making Alliances and Investing Heavily In Defence To Counter China's Regional Domination

Arkain2K

Si vis pacem, para bellum
@Steel
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
33,612
Reaction score
5,998
Australia is revamping their entire military, from strategic defensive pacts with allied nations to making deals for nuclear submarines, warships, stealth jet fighters, attack helicopters, and now the latest armors.
---

State Department approves $3.5B sale of Apache attack helicopters to Australia
By Christen McCurdy | June 3, 2021



The State Department has approved a possible $3.5 billion sale of AH-64E Apache helicopters to the Australian government, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency announced Thursday.

According to the DSCA, Australia's government asked to buy 29 Apaches and associated equipment -- including spare parts, Hellfire Captive Air Training Missiles, M230E1 + M139 AWS automatic gun -- as well as training and logistical support.

The prime contractors in the the program will be Boeing and Lockheed Martin, the DSCA said.

"The proposed sale will improve Australia's capability to meet current and future threats, and will enhance interoperability with U.S. forces and other allied forces," the DSCA's announcement said. "Australia will use the enhanced capability to strengthen its homeland defense and provide greater security for its critical infrastructure."

Australia's defense ministry announced the request in January, saying the AH-64E Apache Guardian would replace its Airbus Helicopters Tiger fleet as its next armed reconnaissance helicopter.

"The Apache Guardian is the most lethal, most survivable and lowest-risk option, meeting all of [the Department of] Defence's capability, through-life support, security and certification requirements," defense minister Linda Reynolds said in a statement at the time.

Australia joins 17 countries -- including India,the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Britain in flying Apaches.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Defense-New...opters-Australia-sale-approved/9531622757740/
-----

Australia To Acquire Abrams Main Battle Tanks, Armoured Vehicles From The US In A $2.58 Billion Deal

January 10, 2022

M1A1_Abrams_Tank.jpg

Australia will spend $2.58 billion USD on the purchase of 120 tanks and other armored vehicles from the United States, Australian Minister for Defense Peter Dutton said on Monday.

“Teamed with the infantry fighting vehicle, combat engineering vehicles, and self-propelled howitzers, the new Abrams will give our soldiers the best possibility of success and protection from harm,” Dutton said as quoted by the Sydney Morning Herald.

According to the newspaper, a $2.58 billion purchase will include a batch of 75 upgraded M1A2 Abrams tanks, which will replace 59 M1A1 tanks purchased in 2007.

At the same time, 29 assault clearing vehicles used against minefields, 17 bridge landing vehicles and six repair and evacuation tanks will be purchased. It is reported that the first batch of such weapons will be delivered in 2024 and put into service from 2025.

On October 9, the US approved a nearly $1 billion sale of 12 Sikorsky MH-60R Black Hawk helicopters to Australia.

Australia Building Military Might

Earlier, Australia and Japan signed a new agreement to strengthen collaboration between the two countries in the field of defense and security, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison said on December 6.

“Prime Minister, today we demonstrate the strength of our bonds as we sign our Reciprocal Access Agreement, the first of its kind for Japan. The RAA [Reciprocal Access Agreement,] is a landmark treaty that opens a new chapter for advanced defense and security cooperation, in what is a complex and rapidly changing world, something you and I both understand very well,” Morrison said to Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida during a virtual meeting.

Morrison also said the pact will strengthen “more complex engagement, interoperability and cooperation” between the Australian and Japanese forces.

In November 2021, Morrison said Tokyo and Canberra had reached an agreement in principle on the Japan-Australia Reciprocal Access treaty that would deepen the countries’ strategic and security relationship.

The Reciprocal Access Agreement will expand interoperability and collaboration between the Japanese Self-Defense Forces and the Australian Defense Force by eliminating limitations on the movement of weapons and supplies for cooperative training and disaster relief missions.

In late 2020, Japan and Australia stated that they would work to reduce legal and administrative barriers to their forces visiting each other’s nations, encouraging more collaborative training and prompt military assistance.

With this deal, Australia has become the second country to have a formal defense treaty with Japan, after the US.

It comes as the United States, a key ally of both nations, seeks to strengthen defense collaboration in the face of China’s growing military influence in the region. The three nations, along with India, are part of a larger association called Quadrilateral Security Dialogue or QUAD.

More robust security ties are developing among QUAD partners to address common concerns about China in the Indo-Pacific region. European countries have also begun taking a greater interest in the security issues of the region.

The new treaty, according to the Australian Prime Minister, is a statement of the two nations’ commitment to work together in meeting the shared strategic security challenges and to contribute to a secure and stable Indo-Pacific. Morrison said that the cooperation also includes an expanding agenda for QUAD with India and the United States and a shared technology-led approach to reduce carbon emissions.

Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said, “Based on the principle of a free and open Indo-Pacific, I want to raise cooperation with the US, Australia and India and build close ties with their leaders through close consultations.”

“We share with Australia the basic values of freedom and democracy,” Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno told reporters on January 5. The two leaders aim to address issues of mutual concern, including national security, the economy, and regional affairs, in order to improve bilateral ties and cooperation toward a free and open Indo-Pacific, he added.

As expected, the development has not gone down well with China. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said that agreements between countries should promote peace and “not target any third parties.” “The Pacific is vast enough, there’s enough room for shared development for all,” he said, noting that China hoped people would not be “stirring up trouble” in the region.

https://eurasiantimes.com/australia-to-acquire-abrams-main-battle-tanks-from-the-us/?amp
 
Last edited:
-australia
-tanks

i mean, i understand the gigantic circle jerk that is the strategic purchase of reconditioned vehicles for political reasons, but at least give them f35s or something.

anyways, the dingos don' stand a chance now.
 
In all seriousness, what is Australia going to do with tanks? Shouldn’t they focus on air/naval power?

Well, I can see your point but it's probably better to err on the side of safety. If any attacker gains a beachhead, the ground forces can bog them down enough for NATO forces (and by that I mean us because we're not going to let that slide) to swoop in and regain territory.

Fun fact: There amount of welds in an Abrahms tank comes out to a minimum of two miles.
 
Well, I can see your point but it's probably better to err on the side of safety. If any attacker gains a beachhead, the ground forces can bog them down enough for NATO forces (and by that I mean us because we're not going to let that slide) to swoop in and regain territory.

Fun fact: There amount of welds in an Abrahms tank comes out to a minimum of two miles.

what obligation does the north atlantic treaty organization have to defend a non-member state in the south pacific?
 
Well, I can see your point but it's probably better to err on the side of safety. If any attacker gains a beachhead, the ground forces can bog them down enough for NATO forces (and by that I mean us because we're not going to let that slide) to swoop in and regain territory.

Fun fact: There amount of welds in an Abrahms tank comes out to a minimum of two miles.
australia ain't in NATO, nato is for european defense
you probably mean AUKUS, which is a defense forum on paper only so far.
 
In all seriousness, what is Australia going to do with tanks? Shouldn’t they focus on air/naval power?
It's not about effectiveness, it's about lobbying and political corruption. This is how politicians and their ilk get rich.
 
In all seriousness, what is Australia going to do with tanks? Shouldn’t they focus on air/naval power?
It's a symbolic force. For comparison the US operates around 2.5 thousand Abrams.
Most military stuff is meaningless anyhow. For example, Australia had troops fighting against the Taliban. How exactly does that help Australia? How does spending money and lives in Afghanistan helps the interests of Australia?
Australia has only one possible existential threat in the region and it's China. Tanks, or anything frankly, would be useless against them anyhow.
what obligation does the north atlantic treaty organization have to defend a non-member state in the south pacific?
No obligation but I think it's pretty obvious the US and probably other NATO countries would help Australia against a major attack.
 
No big deal if they want them. Frin the numbers it's more about traing in modern equipment and having them just in case.

I wouldn't mind selling them a couple of fully refurbished and loaded boomers. I think that would make more sense.
 
Wtf is up with Australia? What are they gearing up for? Buying subs and tanks.
 
Back
Top