Elections AOC Loses Key Vote for Committee Leadership to Pelosi-Backed 74-Year-Old

SKYNET said:
FTFY
Click to expand...

Why would I ask you to prove an opinion you have?

For whatever reason you hold that opinion (which I honestly dont give a sh*t about) you compared her to Harris. I dont agree that politicians who dont take corporate money are equally as disingenuous as ones who do. I dont think that's true, and I'd even argue that if there were any on the right that didnt take corporate money. They might suck IMO, but would insinuate they're more genuine than the bought ones.
 
The Diplomat said:
As a moderate, I get that AOC may be too progressive for some. But after the shellacking in November, we need to look forward to younger individuals who could lead the party in the future. The Democrats don't have too many options these days. Pelosi got us to a certain point, but she's obviously out of touch, and a reminder of the old guard who allows corruption for selfish gains.
Click to expand...

Just merely being young is a pretty weak qualification. AOC is just as out of touch as any 70 something year old would be. Just on the other end of the spectrum.

Also don't forget that while her district was getting locked down during covid, she was vacationing in the free state of Florida.
 
RoastBeast said:
Just merely being young is a pretty weak qualification. AOC is just as out of touch as any 70 something year old would be. Just on the other end of the spectrum.

Also don't forget that while her district was getting locked down during covid, she was vacationing in the free state of Florida.
Click to expand...

Nobody was "locked down."
 
Sinister said:
Why would I ask you to prove an opinion you have?

For whatever reason you hold that opinion (which I honestly dont give a sh*t about) you compared her to Harris. I dont agree that politicians who dont take corporate money are equally as disingenuous as ones who do. I dont think that's true, and I'd even argue that if there were any on the right that didnt take corporate money. They might suck IMO, but would insinuate they're more genuine than the bought ones.
Click to expand...

You can trust me on this, I'm not a phony.

In no way was I going to dig up facts that prove AOC is a phony, much less give you my opinion when there are facts not bound by left or right leaning propaganda to support it.

We both know you aren't interested in facts, otherwise you wouldn't try to split hairs over how much (or little) of a phony someone has to be in order for you to defend them.

Don't flatter yourself darling.
 
SKYNET said:
You can trust me on this, I'm not a phony.

In no way was I going to dig up facts that prove AOC is a phony, much less give you my opinion when there are facts not bound by left or right leaning propaganda to support it.

We both know you aren't interested in facts, otherwise you wouldn't try to split hairs over how much (or little) of a phony someone has to be in order for you to defend them.

Don't flatter yourself darling.
Click to expand...

The fact is she doesnt take corporate money, sweetie pie. Your opinion of her notwithstanding
 
AOC been a complete cuck for the DNC, abandoning everything that got her into office, and they still shit on her. LOL!
 
Snubnoze707 said:
That's not a fact. She has taken lobbyist money every year since getting into office.
Click to expand...

No.

www.opensecrets.org

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - New York District 14
www.opensecrets.org www.opensecrets.org

This smear propaganda has been going on since 2020. She got individual contributions from people who are lobbyists, she was not lobbied on behalf of corporations and has taken no PAC dollars to this day.
 
Sinister said:
She got individual contributions from people who are lobbyists, she was not lobbied on behalf of corporations and has taken no PAC dollars to this day.
Click to expand...
LOL. OK.

Nearly 100 "individual contributions from lobbyists" but she's not receiving lobbyist money. OK.

Surely their is no corporate strings attached... they were just feeling generous.
 
Snubnoze707 said:
LOL. OK.

Nearly 100 "individual contributions from lobbyists" but she's not receiving lobbyist money. OK.

Surely their is no corporate strings attached... they were just feeling generous.
Click to expand...

Nice way of saying you have NO argument. She has $0 in corporate PAC money. Which there is no limit on campaign spending. You're arguing she is being influenced by individual donations, which pale in comparison lol
 
Sinister said:
Nice way of saying you have NO argument. She has $0 in corporate PAC money. Which there is no limit on campaign spending. You're arguing she is being influenced by individual donations, which pale in comparison lol
Click to expand...
My argument was that she received lobbyist money.

You: "She got individual contributions from people who are lobbyists"

What the fuck more of an argument do I need?
 
syct23 said:
What about evidence?

Would you accept that as currency?
Click to expand...
Evidence regarding what? A phony person does something genuine therefore we can always assume she's genuine and forget anything she's done that makes her a phony?

Is this coming from the same folks who shamed me for not choosing the lesser evil?
 
SKYNET said:
Evidence regarding what? A phony person does something genuine therefore we can always assume she's genuine and forget anything she's done that makes her a phony?

Is this coming from the same folks who shamed me for not choosing the lesser evil?
Click to expand...
So you’re saying you chose the big evil?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

cottagecheesefan
Law Ranking democrat on ethics committee admits to leaks about Gaetz
4 5 6
Replies
118
Views
2K
cincymma79
C

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,868
Messages
56,674,434
Members
175,342
Latest member
bones78

Share this page

Back
Top