- Joined
- Oct 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,560
- Reaction score
- 278
A friend of mine and I actually got into an autograph vs photo argument last night. She said the photo was cooler because it's more personal and something you can show people and be like, Yeah, here I was with such-and-such.
I think autograph's are cooler specifically because they are less personal. By being less personal, they are more universal in appeal. They go from being something that is kind of cool for YOU but that no one else would want to own to being something that is collectible to other people.
For the record, I did get a photo with JDF though (with the obligatory first pose, of course):
![]()
Nice pic. I get what your saying but I'm only interested in the personal appeal. I don't concern myself with possible future resale or anything like that. I just like meeting the people who have entertained me over the years and having a souvenir to go with it. My personal favourite pic is with Hulk Hogan because the size difference is pretty hilarious.