Law Another W for Meritocracy: California bans Legacy Admissions in all colleges and universities

Arkain2K

Si vis pacem, para bellum
@Steel
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
33,543
Reaction score
5,905
Recap: California leads the way in banning Affirmative Action all the way back in 1996. Its UC and CSU public university systems eliminated Legacy Admission in 1998, and now that practice is banned in all private colleges in the state as well.
---

California bans legacy admissions in all colleges, universities

ByKiara Alfonseca | September 30, 2024

usc-gty-er-240930_1727725139628_hpMain.jpg


California has become the fourth state to ban legacy admissions in the college application process, a practice that has long been criticized as favoring white or wealthy students based on their familial alumni connections.

"In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a Monday statement. "The California Dream shouldn't be accessible to just a lucky few, which is why we're opening the door to higher education wide enough for everyone, fairly."

The decision affects private and nonprofit universities. The University of California system eliminated legacy admission preferences in 1998, according to Newsom's office.

Legacy admissions have come under heightened scrutiny following the Supreme Court's decision to limit race-based affirmative action programs for colleges and universities in June 2023. California law had banned affirmative action in 1996.

"In light of this shift, proponents of AB 1780 advocated for admissions criteria that additionally ensure that factors like wealth or personal relationships do not unduly influence admissions decisions," the governor's office said in a statement.

The majority of Americans -- 75% of those surveyed in a April 2022 Pew Research study -- believe a student's relationship to an alumni should not be a factor in admissions.

"AB 1780 aims to ensure that admissions decisions are based on merit rather than personal connections — reducing biases in the admissions process at private colleges in California," the governor's office said.

All private colleges and universities in California must now submit an annual report to ensure compliance.

Research has shown that legacy applicants are admitted at higher rates, but are not more qualified or academically superior applicants. They are also a less racially diverse population.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Colorado-Boulder analyzed 16 years of data from an unnamed elite university in a September 2022 study released in the journal American Sociological Review.

It found that 34.2% of legacy applicants were admitted, compared to 13.9% of non-legacy applicants -- most of them white, and most of them wealthier than their counterparts. These students are from ZIP codes with higher mean incomes and are less likely to apply for financial aid with their application, the study said. They are also flagged by the school as having high donor potential.

An analysis from the Institute for Higher Education Policy in 2021 found that 53% of selective four-year colleges consider legacy status in their admissions decisions.

California joins Colorado, Maryland and Virginia in banning these practices, reinforcing bans that hundreds of colleges have already implemented.

 
Last edited:
I agree it isn't fair, but I think that's also where a lot of alumni funding comes from so I don't know what to think.
 
Recap: California leads the way in banning Affirmative Action all the way back in 1996. Its UC and CSU public college systems eliminated Legacy Admission in 1998, and now that practice is banned in all private colleges in the state as well.
---

California bans legacy admissions in all colleges, universities

ByKiara Alfonseca | September 30, 2024

usc-gty-er-240930_1727725139628_hpMain.jpg


California has become the fourth state to ban legacy admissions in the college application process, a practice that has long been criticized as favoring white or wealthy students based on their familial alumni connections.

"In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a Monday statement. "The California Dream shouldn't be accessible to just a lucky few, which is why we're opening the door to higher education wide enough for everyone, fairly."

The decision affects private and nonprofit universities. The University of California system eliminated legacy admission preferences in 1998, according to Newsom's office.

Legacy admissions have come under heightened scrutiny following the Supreme Court's decision to limit race-based affirmative action programs for colleges and universities in June 2023. California law had banned affirmative action in 1996.

"In light of this shift, proponents of AB 1780 advocated for admissions criteria that additionally ensure that factors like wealth or personal relationships do not unduly influence admissions decisions," the governor's office said in a statement.

The majority of Americans -- 75% of those surveyed in a April 2022 Pew Research study -- believe a student's relationship to an alumni should not be a factor in admissions.

"AB 1780 aims to ensure that admissions decisions are based on merit rather than personal connections — reducing biases in the admissions process at private colleges in California," the governor's office said.

All private colleges and universities in California must now submit an annual report to ensure compliance.

Research has shown that legacy applicants are admitted at higher rates, but are not more qualified or academically superior applicants. They are also a less racially diverse population.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Colorado-Boulder analyzed 16 years of data from an unnamed elite university in a September 2022 study released in the journal American Sociological Review.

It found that 34.2% of legacy applicants were admitted, compared to 13.9% of non-legacy applicants -- most of them white, and most of them wealthier than their counterparts. These students are from ZIP codes with higher mean incomes and are less likely to apply for financial aid with their application, the study said. They are also flagged by the school as having high donor potential.

An analysis from the Institute for Higher Education Policy in 2021 found that 53% of selective four-year colleges consider legacy status in their admissions decisions.

California joins Colorado, Maryland and Virginia in banning these practices, reinforcing bans that hundreds of colleges have already implemented.


This is a slippery slope

Whats next, battling wealth inequality?
 
Recap: California leads the way in banning Affirmative Action all the way back in 1996. Its UC and CSU public college systems eliminated Legacy Admission in 1998, and now that practice is banned in all private colleges in the state as well.
---

California bans legacy admissions in all colleges, universities

ByKiara Alfonseca | September 30, 2024

usc-gty-er-240930_1727725139628_hpMain.jpg


California has become the fourth state to ban legacy admissions in the college application process, a practice that has long been criticized as favoring white or wealthy students based on their familial alumni connections.

"In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a Monday statement. "The California Dream shouldn't be accessible to just a lucky few, which is why we're opening the door to higher education wide enough for everyone, fairly."

The decision affects private and nonprofit universities. The University of California system eliminated legacy admission preferences in 1998, according to Newsom's office.

Legacy admissions have come under heightened scrutiny following the Supreme Court's decision to limit race-based affirmative action programs for colleges and universities in June 2023. California law had banned affirmative action in 1996.

"In light of this shift, proponents of AB 1780 advocated for admissions criteria that additionally ensure that factors like wealth or personal relationships do not unduly influence admissions decisions," the governor's office said in a statement.

The majority of Americans -- 75% of those surveyed in a April 2022 Pew Research study -- believe a student's relationship to an alumni should not be a factor in admissions.

"AB 1780 aims to ensure that admissions decisions are based on merit rather than personal connections — reducing biases in the admissions process at private colleges in California," the governor's office said.

All private colleges and universities in California must now submit an annual report to ensure compliance.

Research has shown that legacy applicants are admitted at higher rates, but are not more qualified or academically superior applicants. They are also a less racially diverse population.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Colorado-Boulder analyzed 16 years of data from an unnamed elite university in a September 2022 study released in the journal American Sociological Review.

It found that 34.2% of legacy applicants were admitted, compared to 13.9% of non-legacy applicants -- most of them white, and most of them wealthier than their counterparts. These students are from ZIP codes with higher mean incomes and are less likely to apply for financial aid with their application, the study said. They are also flagged by the school as having high donor potential.

An analysis from the Institute for Higher Education Policy in 2021 found that 53% of selective four-year colleges consider legacy status in their admissions decisions.

California joins Colorado, Maryland and Virginia in banning these practices, reinforcing bans that hundreds of colleges have already implemented.


In theory that sounds great, but I didn't notice in the article a claim that the legacy admits had lower scores.
 
Affirnitive action ban: "Step in the right direction to assure true equality and meritocracy."

Legacy admissions ban: "Meaningless feel good legislation."
I dont buy that kids, whose parents come from affluent areas, will need legacy admissions, they go where they please, if they go at all. Nothing close to affirmative action. And last I checked, you losers bitched and moaned when AA was banned.
 
i don’t see what business the government has telling private colleges who to admit, much less if it doesn’t involve some constitutionally protected category.
 
So, because a parent went to a school, if you chose to go there, now it’s automatically a legacy admission?

But overall, even though I am a legacy admission (I went where my dad did and who knows, maybe that’s why I got in?) I think admissions should be mostly blind and based upon grades and SATs as well as extracurricular activities. Questions about race shouldn’t be on any forms-of course, if a school wants to stack the diversity numbers, they are going to pick the names that sound ethnic. Need more black students? Pick black names. Want to avoid asian students? Avoid Asian last names.
 
i don’t see what business the government has telling private colleges who to admit, much less if it doesn’t involve some constitutionally protected category.

I agree. I look at legacy aspect as just part of the package-like sports or extracurricular activities that round out an individual’s profile to fit with their grades. Let’s face it, the colleges are going to admit dumb ass football players because sports are the most important aspect, because as the great James caan once said in the program “when was the last time 60k people showed up to watch a science experiment?”
 
- How does afirmative action works? Let's say, a person can go to that specific college/uni just because someone from his family was there? He doesntr do a test like all the other people?

And if the person is very stupid, that person can still go?
 
Private schools should be able to do as they please. I don't have to agree with their decisions, but as long as it's self-funded, the government shouldn't have a say.
 
i don’t see what business the government has telling private colleges who to admit, much less if it doesn’t involve some constitutionally protected category.
I was wondering about this. Certainly private universities are heavily subsidized at great expense to local, state and federal governments so seems like they need to comply.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,250,406
Messages
56,388,738
Members
175,194
Latest member
bat123
Back
Top