Andrew Tate arrested

The two things you're trying to equate here aren't the same though. Asking for money through OF is legal, sex trafficking isn't.
Still manipulating and taking advantage of the guy’s need for female companionship. Those women could leave anytime. Leave the house, even if she didn’t have money. So she wasn’t be hold against her own free will. In your way of thinking, that is legal too.
 
But not sex trafficking like Andrew Tate did.
Did he hold a gun to her head and told her she couldn’t leave? She had free will to leave, just like those men had free will to not spend their life savings on a bimbo gold digger.
 
How emotional it makes me? I said you grossed me out. That's lashing out to you? I'm not in here crying about how he commiserated with your hateful views of women but somehow crossed a line now--LOL. Piece of shit gonna piece of shit. That's the extent of my emotional involvement on this topic. You might wish to take a look in the mirror to find the real issue here.

Yea, you're clearly being emotional.
 
Why not have the same energy for women trying to get married to some shady rich guy with multiple girlfriends and doing cam work for him to earn his approval for a wife?
Because if it's their choice then they aren't being exploited.
 
Still manipulating and taking advantage of the guy’s need for female companionship. Those women could leave anytime. Leave the house, even if she didn’t have money. So she wasn’t be hold against her own free will. In your way of thinking, that is legal too.
{<hhh]
 
Did he hold a gun to her head and told her she couldn’t leave? She had free will to leave, just like those men had free will to not spend their life savings on a bimbo gold digger.
No but his accomplice would threaten them with violence and force them to reveal their phone's location history to track them and keep them on the compound. Tate in his own words said he didn't want these women moving around or visiting their hometown but in the compound at all times. He intended to keep them on the compound with a combination of lies, seduction, and threats of violence.
 
Because if it's their choice then they aren't being exploited.
The women know what they are doing. The men are being exploited. Like the guy in bumfights giving money to homeless people to fight each other.
It’s their choice too with these homeless people, according to you.

 
Last edited:
No but his accomplice would threaten them with violence and force them to reveal their phone's location history to track them and keep them on the compound. Tate in his own words said he didn't want these women moving around or visiting their hometown but in the compound at all times. He intended to keep them on the compound with a combination of lies, seduction, and threats of violence.
And poverty.
 
The people like Candace Owens and Tucker who put this guy on cannot plead ignorance. The information is out there, so they were betting on A.) Tate being completely innocent, which doesn’t seem likely considering everything is leaning the other way, or B.) Romanian justice failing. They cannot turn around and talk about Epstein, drag queen story times, creepy trans people committing crimes, men not being men, etc., for they enabled someone like Tate in order to generate clicks.
 
The women know what they are doing. The men are being exploited. Like the guy in bumfights giving homeless people to fight each other.
It’s their choice too with these homeless people, according to you.


The guys are being exploited in a legal way. Silver tonguing someone and them volunteering to give you money with an expectation is different than keeping them locked in your house while you drain their bank account.
 
The guys are being exploited in a legal way. Silver tonguing someone and them volunteering to give you money with an expectation is different than keeping them locked in your house while you drain their bank account.
How was her bank account drained? He encouraged her not to leave, the same way a gold digger would encourage a guy to spend on her so she wouldn’t leave.
 
No but his accomplice would threaten them with violence and force them to reveal their phone's location history to track them and keep them on the compound. Tate in his own words said he didn't want these women moving around or visiting their hometown but in the compound at all times. He intended to keep them on the compound with a combination of lies, seduction, and threats of violence.
Don't forget steal from them , he would lie and tell them he had to take out taxes and other expenses and give them a fraction of what they were owed

How anyone with a mother would defend this piece of shit is beyond me.
 
Last edited:
Women don’t need to manipulate men to do sex work because they can just take money from them through manipulation with female approval. How about both become illegal?

There's no legal basis which would make that illegal. Stop being a retard.

Also, notice how you call those guys losers instead of victims? Maybe give the same treatment to women trying to win a relationship from a shady rich man that is obviously full of red flags, especially when he asks them to do sex work.

If you pay 8K simply to be in Tate's presence and then give thousands more for some dumbass "secrets" - you're a gullible retard. Yea they may be victims, but also stupid as hell. That's like saying people falling for the Nigerian Prince scam are only victims and not morons. 2 things can be true at the same time.

You are now at a point where you're defending the indefensible. Look at the actual evidence and texts. He's guilty.

If that's illegal, a lot of people are going to jail.

I'm just mentioning that to illustrate how stupid it is for any guy to actually still support Tate.
 
Last edited:
There's no legal basis which would make that illegal. Stop being a retard.



If you pay 8K simply to be in Tate's presence and then give thousands more for some dumbass "secrets" - you're a gullible retard. Yea they may be victims, but also stupid as hell. That's like saying people falling for the Nigerian Prince scam are only victims and not morons. 2 things can be true at the same time.

You are now at a point where you're defending the indefensible. Look at the actual evidence and texts. He's guilty.



I'm just mentioning that to illustrate how stupid it is for any guy to actually still support Tate.

I've never heard of or met anyone who supports him. Here or irl.
 
Back
Top