- Joined
- Dec 1, 2021
- Messages
- 62,415
- Reaction score
- 104,410
Id rather see India because I grew up on watching Africa on TV, and there wasn't nearly as much on India tbh sir.
I would also like to see Yosemite because tourist are fuckin up Yellowstone.
I'm guessing Tigers are probably harder to spot though given they live in woodland compared top open grassland.Id rather see India because I grew up on watching Africa on TV, and there wasn't nearly as much on India tbh sir.
I would also like to see Yosemite because tourist are fuckin up Yellowstone.
I'm guessing Tigers are probably harder to spot though given they live in woodland compared top open grassland.
India really I think it tends to be more of a mix holiday, people do some site seeing and some wildlife were as Africa its more likely they'll do mostly the latter.Probably, but if im going to live in fear I might as well stay home sir lol.
Indian really I think it tends to be more of a mix holiday, people do some site seeing and some wildlife were as Africa its more likely they'll do mostly the latter.
Again I get the impression that in India it often tends to be people spend a few days at a wildlife area as part of a longer tour with it being as much about the experience as the wildlife, luxury camps, elephant rides, etc.There is absolutely no doubt about that, not only given the difference of their predominant natural habitats but behavior as well considering Lions are casual and highly social, while Tigers tend to be a lot more elusive and solitary. In addition to the fact that the global lion population is about five times greater than that of tigers. On a safari in any top-tier park of Kenya, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, or South Africa, you are pretty much guaranteed to see lions. And elephants. And giraffes. And hippos. Tigers are borderline 50/50 and down to chance.
It’s not like he’s ranking the world’s best trains.After reading this post I would say discovering Autism.
Yes I made mistake. Sometimes T-800 malfunction. Japan has best train.It’s not like he’s ranking the world’s best trains.
Yeah, but it's dirt cheap with an Annual Pass and provides incredible bang for the buck as @jk7707 has noted a couple of times in other threads.
Entrance Passes (U.S. National Park Service)
The National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass Series is your ticket to more than 2,000 federal recreation sites, covering entrance, standard amenity, and day-use fees.www.nps.gov
So $80 gets you into any and every park an unlimited number of times for an entire year. For a couple, family, or group of people, it's actually cheaper than going to watch a movie at the cinema for a mere couple of hours, and is considerably more affordable than the one-time, one day entry cost to basically any amusement park, zoo, carnival, concert, sporting event, or privately owned and operated attraction that all charge on a per person basis.
As a general rule, the GOAT level American national parks are open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year -- if possible. The remote locations of some of them combined with inclement weather in the winter and intentionally limited supporting infrastructure means that they aren't always that accessible year-round but it would be wildly dangerous and irresponsible to not temporarily close them off.
Yosemite is way more crowded than Yellowstone.I would also like to see Yosemite because tourist are fuckin up Yellowstone.
Yosemite is way more crowded than Yellowstone.
More crowded but the tourists in Yellowstone are shitty with the animals sir.