- Joined
- Mar 31, 2008
- Messages
- 15,738
- Reaction score
- 15,653
Times defended > Days held
Defending two different titles…
Lol, you can rationalize as hard you as fucking want dude, but you're still spewing bullshit.
Name a MALE champion that could sit on a title for two full years without defending it, without being injured, and not bet ripped to fucking shreds and called to be stripped. You can't.
I don’t think they are including WEC time.Impressive stuff from Nunes, but it seems like a miscount of Aldo's time as champ.
Aldo became FW champ in November 2009 and lost his belt in December 2015. So just over six years as champ.
6 x 365 = 2190, plus another thirty days or so to be exact. Plus he spent another 11 months as champ in 2016-2017, so add roughly 330 days. He spent about about 2500 days as FW champ of the world. He should be number one on this list, unless it is counting longest streak as champ without losing the belt, in which case he should be number two.
I think Nunes could top this list eventually if she can stay focused and healthy. She's a great champ.
That's missing my point. This is just trivia without context. It wouldn't matter if Nunes end up #1 on the list.That isn't the issue though.
This would be more an issue of, if somehow there was an women's league in hockey or basketball that was taken semi-seriously and some woman dominated statistically and now there are comparisons statistically between that woman and Gretzky or LeBron/Jordan/whoever.
On top of that, in this instance it would also be like if the women's season was 1.5-2x as long and counting stats were compiled far more easily. Which is essentially what Nunes' "stat" here is, because she's defended less than 1 time per year on this belt to this point, and she's about to make it a clean 1.0 per year. On top of some very sus competition like 1-1 Pena and Pennington and even GDR.
TS' intention was probably to trigger people honestly lol
That's missing my point. This is just trivia without context. It wouldn't matter if Nunes end up #1 on the list.
People do cross-sport comparisons. People like things like that.
The point is that Nunes has objectively done what she's done. What value to put on it is up to each one.
There are people here who think pound-for-pound rankings are nonsense. I understand their criticism and may even agree. But I can also hold two thoughts at the same time. That is, I can say it's nonsense and at the same time make an argument for why Aldo should be ranked so and so on an all-time pound-for-pound list. It's not that serious.