"Aliens"......no, seriously aliens

Triangular Military Aircraft
tr_3b_photos_1_6.jpg

It's called the TR 3B Blank Manta
tr-3b-black-triangle-paris-july-2008.jpg


TR-3B-sighting.png

 
More about the TR-3B

9 the TR3-B 'Astra' is a large triangular anti-gravity craft within the secret U.S. spacefaring fleet. Black-projects defense industry insider Edgar Rothschild Fouche' wrote about the existence of the TR3-B in his book Alien Rapture(10). The TR3-B does not depend solely or principally on its hydrogen-oxygen rockets. It is a highly-reduced-gravity aerospace craft manufactured in secret "black programs" by Boeing. The reduced-gravity field it produces reduces the vehicle's weight by about 90% so that very little thrust is required to either keep it aloft or to propel it at speeds of Mach 9 or higher.

The TR-3B vehicle's outer coating is electrochemical-reactive and changes with electrical radio-frequency radar stimulation, and can change reflectiveness, radar absorptiveness, and color. This is also the first US vehicle to use quasi-crystals in the vehicle's skin. This polymer skin, when used in conjunction with the TR-3B's Electronic Counter Measures and Electronic Counter-Countermeasures (ECCM), can make the vehicle look like a small aircraft, or a flying cylinder - or even trick radar receivers into falsely detecting a variety of aircraft, no aircraft, or several aircraft at various locations!

A circular plasma-filled accelerator ring called the Magnetic Field Disrupter [MFD] surrounds the rotable crew compartment and is far ahead of any imaginable technology. Sandia and Livermore National laboratories developed the reverse-engineered MFD technology. The mercury-based plasma is pressurized at 250,000 atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin, and accelerated to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive charged plasma with resulting gravity-disruption [reduction of almost all of the pull of gravity and effects of inertia].

The MFD generates a magnetic-vortex field which disrupts or neutralizes the effects of gravity by 89 percent on a mass within proximity. The MFD creates a disruption of the Earth's gravitational field upon the mass within the circular accelerator. The mass of the circular accelerator and all mass within the accelerator, such as the crew capsule, avionics, MFD systems, fuels, crew environmental systems, and the nuclear reactor, are reduced by 89%. The current MFD in the TR-3B craft causes the effect of making the vehicle extremely light, and able to outperform and outmaneuver any craft yet constructed - except of course those back-engineered total-antigravity craft, which the government does not admit exist.

The TR-3B is a high-altitude, stealth reconnaissance platform with an indefinite loiter time. Once it gets to operational altitude, it doesn't take much propulsion to maintain altitude. With the vehicle mass reduced by 89%, the craft can travel at Mach 9 vertically or horizontally. My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots can endure. Such stresses are greatly reduced, considering that along with the 89% reduction in mass, the inertial G (gravity) forces are also reduced by 89%. The crew of the TR-3B can comfortably take up to 40Gs.

The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by three multimode thrusters mounted at each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach 9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet - then above atmospheric drag it can go much faster!
The reactor heats the liquid hydrogen and injects liquid oxygen into the supersonic nozzle, so that the hydrogen burns concurrently in the liquid- oxygen afterburner. The multimode propulsion system can operate in the atmosphere with lift from the Magnetic Field Disrupter powered by the nuclear reactor and propulsion by burning hydrogen, and in orbit it uses the combined hydrogen/oxygen propulsion. The engines are reportedly built by Rockwell.
 
Last edited:
You'll love these ones.





Never seen those before, thanks for sharing bud.

Other good videos to search out are those that are storm related. There are often UFO sightings in conjunction with lighting storms.

One interesting UFO case I've come across is the Rendlesham Forest incident. One of the fellas involved, US Airman John Burroughs, was actually awarded a settlement for injuries he supposedly suffered as a result of the encounter.

Air Force Veteran awarded full disability for UFO exposure

John Burroughs, Jim Penniston and a small security team first investigated a brightening light within the Rendlesham forest in December of 1980, but the light flew away when they approached. It was the following night when more lights showed up that Burroughs had a face-to-face encounter with the UFOs. Among the security team, Burroughs was said to have been the closest to the lights resulting in exposure to massive amounts of radiation.

https://popularmilitary.com/air-force-veteran-awarded-full-disability-for-ufo-exposure/

In the documentary I've linked above about the ARV, it is mentioned that the vehicle required a synthetic vision system (no windows) because the operators needed to be shielded from the harmful surrounding radiation caused by the craft's propulsion system. The craft was also coated with a special lead paint/substance for that exact same reason, similar to how you're given a lead apron when getting x-rays at the local hospital.

Interesting, especially when you consider cases like that of US Airman Burroughs, who suffered the harmful effects of radiation for getting too close to a craft he encountered.
 
Last edited:
Anyone ever heard of Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)? It was founded by a former Navy officer with a PhD in engineering. This company is DEEPLY involved with the military and their systems are in use today.

The founder said that all of the UFO stuff you've seen is actually tech that we have. He said in an interview that "We have sent men past Saturn and returned them home safely."
 
Anyone ever heard of Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)? It was founded by a former Navy officer with a PhD in engineering. This company is DEEPLY involved with the military and their systems are in use today.

The founder said that all of the UFO stuff you've seen is actually tech that we have. He said in an interview that "We have sent men past Saturn and returned them home safely."
Tell me more
 
Tell me more


He went on to say that "if you've seen it in the movies, we probably already have it or something VERY close to it."

I really wish I could find that interview! Dang!
 
He went on to say that "if you've seen it in the movies, we probably already have it or something VERY close to it."

I really wish I could find that interview! Dang!
Yeah, I looked SAIC and the founders wikipedia page but it doesnt mention it. If we have this tech where did it come from? Reverse engineering?
 
Not surprised to see Assange claim this is just NYT with fake news and CIA-parapsychology fraud.
 
Ten essential elements of a covert op



Ten essential elements of a covert op



ONE: Compartmentalization.

The tasks necessary to carrying out the operation are divided among players at different levels. In a successful op, these groups of players are unaware of each other. They wouldn’t be able to confess to more than their own roles.

And in many cases, the disparate players would never believe they were part of an op. They would swear they were “doing good”—as, for example, in medical research that was—unknown to the researchers—actually designed to obscure a chemical attack on a population, by locating a virus as the false culprit. By training and by general stupidity, the researchers are always predisposed to finding a virus. The last thing on their minds is that they’re part of an op.

TWO: Gaining tremendous media coverage for the effect of the op (even exaggerating the effects), while hiding the cause and the players who planned it.

THREE: Blaming the wrong people as the originators of the op. Relentlessly discrediting truth tellers who see what’s really going on.

FOUR: Developing and promoting a false cover story to describe the details of the op; in many cases, those details are wrong. For example, the famous truck bomb parked at the curb of the Murrah Federal Building on April 19, 1995, did most assuredly not cause the human and property destruction that ensued. There were bombs inside the building.

FIVE: Laying down false trails for investigators and independent researchers. In the wake of the JFK assassination, we saw the emergence of many, many “alternative” scenarios. Some of that “information” was designed to lead into dead-end alleys—after much time and frustration.

SIX: At least several goals. In any large covert op, there are a few different objectives, at different levels. For example, certain players gain an increase in status; profits for the elite planners; control of market share; demonizing of opponents; general demoralization of the population. Arguments over “the real purpose” of an op are often misguided. There was never just one purpose.

SEVEN: Testing public response. After an op, analysts are tasked with assessing the public reaction. Did most people buy the official scenario? What objections were raised? Who raised them? An effort is made to be as precise as possible. What lessons were learned that can be applied to the next op?

EIGHT: Controlled opposition. This aspect involves infiltrating independent voices with plants, who try to take charge of unofficial and truthful narrative and steer it AWAY from the truth.

Among the plants are people who promote the most absurd theories possible about the op. And then there are those plants who accuse everyone who doesn’t agree with them of being “CIA agents.”

Note: Several of these functions are actually carried out by people who aren’t plants at all. They’re just crazy and/or desperate egomaniacs. They obtain their highest degree of satisfaction from making accusations against innocent people and inventing sleights against themselves. They live in an unenviable sewer.

NINE: Distraction. After a covert op, the government and the press will sometimes promote and pump a new story, concerning a different “sensational event”—and lean on it for a period of time sufficient to distract the public from the original op.

TEN: Limited hangout. This strategy involves seeding a cover story with some bit of truth to attract the unwary, in hopes that they will buy the whole cover. Or, admitting to a watered down piece of truth about the op itself, to “let off steam” and make it seem as if the whole op has been exposed.

These ten elements (there are more) are standard. They’re not esoteric. Any intelligence agency deploys them in a variety of situations.

For the most part, the press simply takes dictation and reports what front men for covert ops want reported. Of course, the press is seeded with intell assets.

How does a researcher deal with these ten elements? He drills down below the cover story to discover the core facts about the op. He isn’t diverted by the distractions and the fake news.

He must be ready to find some mind-boggling truths at the core and accept what he finds.

Having discovered the core, he can then “reverse engineer” the op and see how it was put together. He can see who benefited at various levels.


A final note for now: just because ops are covert, that doesn’t mean they are well executed. Quite often the operators make blunders. In that case, the following cover-up carries the freight of mistakes and smooths them out by concocting fantasies that are relayed to the press, and in turn, to the public. And even then, the cover-up can fail to impress intelligent observers. However, through repetition, and by using “experts,” the mainstream media keeps promoting the cover story. In the end, it is the sheer monopolistic power of the press that functions as the ultimate cover.
 
Not surprised to see Assange claim this is just NYT with fake news and CIA-parapsychology fraud.
He also stated that part of this is just courting of the "ufo vote".

<Oku02>
 


I am officially boycotting the entire War Room sub-forum until Christmas. Not because of our fine mods, but because of the cry babies who contributed to my temporary banishment from the other thread. Since these posters cannot suck my dick, everyone who wants to do business with me is going to have to venture into the OT where you will most likely be treated like crew sluts (Frank Zappa style) OR wander into the dump to browse my threads there.

It's just too easy to spook with truth here. The creature from the black lagoon saw the pussies.


Short version: I'm self banning from the War room until Santa Cloud doses you with Holy water.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.


Things are in good hands in this thread. You don't need me.
 
Ten essential elements of a covert op



Ten essential elements of a covert op



ONE: Compartmentalization.

The tasks necessary to carrying out the operation are divided among players at different levels. In a successful op, these groups of players are unaware of each other. They wouldn’t be able to confess to more than their own roles.

And in many cases, the disparate players would never believe they were part of an op. They would swear they were “doing good”—as, for example, in medical research that was—unknown to the researchers—actually designed to obscure a chemical attack on a population, by locating a virus as the false culprit. By training and by general stupidity, the researchers are always predisposed to finding a virus. The last thing on their minds is that they’re part of an op.

TWO: Gaining tremendous media coverage for the effect of the op (even exaggerating the effects), while hiding the cause and the players who planned it.

THREE: Blaming the wrong people as the originators of the op. Relentlessly discrediting truth tellers who see what’s really going on.

FOUR: Developing and promoting a false cover story to describe the details of the op; in many cases, those details are wrong. For example, the famous truck bomb parked at the curb of the Murrah Federal Building on April 19, 1995, did most assuredly not cause the human and property destruction that ensued. There were bombs inside the building.

FIVE: Laying down false trails for investigators and independent researchers. In the wake of the JFK assassination, we saw the emergence of many, many “alternative” scenarios. Some of that “information” was
Ten essential elements of a covert op



Ten essential elements of a covert op



ONE: Compartmentalization.

The tasks necessary to carrying out the operation are divided among players at different levels. In a successful op, these groups of players are unaware of each other. They wouldn’t be able to confess to more than their own roles.

And in many cases, the disparate players would never believe they were part of an op. They would swear they were “doing good”—as, for example, in medical research that was—unknown to the researchers—actually designed to obscure a chemical attack on a population, by locating a virus as the false culprit. By training and by general stupidity, the researchers are always predisposed to finding a virus. The last thing on their minds is that they’re part of an op.

TWO: Gaining tremendous media coverage for the effect of the op (even exaggerating the effects), while hiding the cause and the players who planned it.

THREE: Blaming the wrong people as the originators of the op. Relentlessly discrediting truth tellers who see what’s really going on.

FOUR: Developing and promoting a false cover story to describe the details of the op; in many cases, those details are wrong. For example, the famous truck bomb parked at the curb of the Murrah Federal Building on April 19, 1995, did most assuredly not cause the human and property destruction that ensued. There were bombs inside the building.

FIVE: Laying down false trails for investigators and independent researchers. In the wake of the JFK assassination, we saw the emergence of many, many “alternative” scenarios. Some of that “information” was designed to lead into dead-end alleys—after much time and frustration.

SIX: At least several goals. In any large covert op, there are a few different objectives, at different levels. For example, certain players gain an increase in status; profits for the elite planners; control of market share; demonizing of opponents; general demoralization of the population. Arguments over “the real purpose” of an op are often misguided. There was never just one purpose.

SEVEN: Testing public response. After an op, analysts are tasked with assessing the public reaction. Did most people buy the official scenario? What objections were raised? Who raised them? An effort is made to be as precise as possible. What lessons were learned that can be applied to the next op?

EIGHT: Controlled opposition. This aspect involves infiltrating independent voices with plants, who try to take charge of unofficial and truthful narrative and steer it AWAY from the truth.

Among the plants are people who promote the most absurd theories possible about the op. And then there are those plants who accuse everyone who doesn’t agree with them of being “CIA agents.”

Note: Several of these functions are actually carried out by people who aren’t plants at all. They’re just crazy and/or desperate egomaniacs. They obtain their highest degree of satisfaction from making accusations against innocent people and inventing sleights against themselves. They live in an unenviable sewer.

NINE: Distraction. After a covert op, the government and the press will sometimes promote and pump a new story, concerning a different “sensational event”—and lean on it for a period of time sufficient to distract the public from the original op.

TEN: Limited hangout. This strategy involves seeding a cover story with some bit of truth to attract the unwary, in hopes that they will buy the whole cover. Or, admitting to a watered down piece of truth about the op itself, to “let off steam” and make it seem as if the whole op has been exposed.

These ten elements (there are more) are standard. They’re not esoteric. Any intelligence agency deploys them in a variety of situations.

For the most part, the press simply takes dictation and reports what front men for covert ops want reported. Of course, the press is seeded with intell assets.

How does a researcher deal with these ten elements? He drills down below the cover story to discover the core facts about the op. He isn’t diverted by the distractions and the fake news.

He must be ready to find some mind-boggling truths at the core and accept what he finds.

Having discovered the core, he can then “reverse engineer” the op and see how it was put together. He can see who benefited at various levels.


A final note for now: just because ops are covert, that doesn’t mean they are well executed. Quite often the operators make blunders. In that case, the following cover-up carries the freight of mistakes and smooths them out by concocting fantasies that are relayed to the press, and in turn, to the public. And even then, the cover-up can fail to impress intelligent observers. However, through repetition, and by using “experts,” the mainstream media keeps promoting the cover story. In the end, it is the sheer monopolistic power of the press that functions as the ultimate cover.

Nice cut and paste derpling. How about telling us the reason behind this "fake ufo news"? Was it a distraction or just done out of boredom?
 
Last edited:
@M3t4tr0n
Brother after all this, does it not make you ponder the possibility of an alien deception?

I mean look at what is going on around the world, at Israel and now this recent shit with aliens and the pentagon coming out about it? A little convenient don't you think?
 
Back
Top