- Joined
- Dec 1, 2008
- Messages
- 6,332
- Reaction score
- 892
This might be the gayest thing I've ever read.
I prefer chicks without dicks, thank you very much.
This might be the gayest thing I've ever read.
I prefer chicks without dicks, thank you very much.
Ya, too each their own, I guess. But I find in most hetero porn the guys junk, whether he is fucking or getting a blow job, is where the camera focuses the most. Seeing a guys junk is the opposite of a turn on for me but it must do something for a lot of other dudes as there is no denying it is popular and a focus for some reason.Nothing worse than a close up of a dudes balls and cornhole as he pounding away. I find it so strange that people like that but then again some people are into weirder shit.
Ya, too each their own, I guess. But I find in most hetero porn the guys junk, whether he is fucking or getting a blow job, is where the camera focuses the most. Seeing a guys junk is the opposite of a turn on for me but it must do something for a lot of other dudes as there is no denying it is popular and a focus for some reason.
Ya, too each their own, I guess. But I find in most hetero porn the guys junk, whether he is fucking or getting a blow job, is where the camera focuses the most. Seeing a guys junk is the opposite of a turn on for me but it must do something for a lot of other dudes as there is no denying it is popular and a focus for some reason.
Lol Yeah, i have never had porn pop up on my phone. And he said it happened to him like 500 times? Lolwut?
I never had porn pop up on my phone. I watch porn on my laptop and never had tranny porn pop up either. Porn doesn't appear out of nowhere...
Ya, too each their own, I guess. But I find in most hetero porn the guys junk, whether he is fucking or getting a blow job, is where the camera focuses the most. Seeing a guys junk is the opposite of a turn on for me but it must do something for a lot of other dudes as there is no denying it is popular and a focus for some reason.
Haha. A whole lot of sherbro'psychology going on there. You have presupposed that guys who enjoy and can get off to seeing other guys junk are straight and guys who are not turned on by and do not get off to it are repressed gays thus the only way to not be gay is to be into another mans junk, lol.I'm guessing what varies a lot in how people get turned on by this kind of material is how much of it is a reaction to something they find attractive and how much is supposition of themselves into the role of another person.
I would say as well that theres a difference between simply not being turned by bodies of a certain gender and disgust to them, the former is I'd say really your true inbuilt sexuality, the latter is much more learned behaviour and I'd imagine a lot of repressed homosexuals end up with a very strong disgust response to the bodies there actually attracted to(not that I like to throw around that claim at specific people on the net), probably one reason for homosexual mental health being worse.
Haha. A whole lot of sherbro'psychology going on there. You have presupposed that guys who enjoy and can get off to seeing other guys junk are straight and guys who are not turned on by and do not get off to it are repressed gays thus the only way to not be gay is to be into another mans junk, lol.
For the record I am not disgusted by other mens junk, it simply is not a stimulus factor for me that turns me on and particularly the strong focus that most porn puts on it. I know it may be weird by I am turned on by the female body and not the guys, as gay as that may sound. Also I am not suggesting guys who are turned on by others guy junk are gay or Bi (some may be) as it is likely an ability for most to use fantasy to imagine that is themselves.
Ya i don 't think we really disagree as I ended my last post with this "Also I am not suggesting guys who are turned on by others guy junk are gay or Bi (some may be) as it is likely an ability for most to use fantasy to imagine that is themselves."The disgust response being learnt is not "sherbro" 'psychology but something with a wealth of scientific evidence behind it and as I said I wasn't making accusations at anyone, just pointing out that people expressing this emotion(or a lack of it) aren't automatically showing their sexual drive.
Honestly I'm with you in finding your typical "jack hammer" porn not very attractive but I wouldn't look to characterise people who do as having some homosexual urge. A big part of it as well to me would be the douchbag persona a pretty high percentage of men involved seem to have, sex as some ego massaging show of dominance isn't for me very sexy. Honestly I suspect that's a lot of the reason lesbian porn has become so widespread, part of it is doubtless people who just preffer to see what there attracted to but also because it doesn't inherit that above douchbag atmosphere,
My guess is that transsexual porn whilst it doubtless appeals to some gay or trans people is probably some kind of fetish for feminisation or general power loss? akin to people say cross dressing sexually or being into BDSM style dominant/submissive sex? You speak to someone like Doughboy though and I'd guess he'd say actually being transsexual is beyond just sex and into your general view of yourself.
I'm a big believer of no porn and limited fwapping. It makes a big differnce in your sex drive and daily mood.