• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Elections Alabama Special Senate Election Live Results Thread

It produces the physical ability to work because you're strong and coordinated enough to perform certain physical tasks, just like the kids in Asia who make all our awesome shit.

Well the body makes an actual womb. That would be the difference
 
Hahahahahaha cry me a fucking river. All you have is emotional bitching and moaning.

Say what you want but I'm not the one who thinks it's ok as a fully developed adult to have sex with a woman at first sign of her period.

You may be trolling but that too is a sad activity. Or one day when you do get daughters you'll realize just how disgusting your comments are.

Now you can go back to what you were to me before I read what you wrote which is a "no thought"
 
Bannon took a hit. He was down there stumping for Statutory Roy. He got a little too full of himself thinking he could stump Roy to a victory.
If Bannon was smart he would not invested any political capital in Statutory Roy and just sat it out. Now he is known as the guy who backed a creepy loser.

The headlines today on Breitbart are hilarious.

"Trump tweet: 'I knew Roy couldn't win'"
"Moore refuses to concede . . . Military votes not yet counted!"
"Breitbart 'Bama Liverwire: Republican saboteurs flip seat to Dems!"
 
The headlines today on Breitbart are hilarious.

"Trump tweet: 'I knew Roy couldn't win'"
"Moore refuses to concede . . . Military votes not yet counted!"
"Breitbart 'Bama Liverwire: Republican saboteurs flip seat to Dems!"
Lol. Breitbart is such a cesspool of dogshit.
 
Are you trying to rationalize fucking a 16 year old?

It might be questionable to have relations with 16-year olds by modern standards, but it is not an act of :eek::eek::eek::eek:philia. :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes prey on sexually immature children.

In Roy Moore's time, while seeking relationships with 16-year olds may or may not have been the norm, we did not yet possess the sort of knowledge that we now do about the possible negative impact on emotional and cognitive growth, caused by relationships at an immature (mental) age. The common understanding appears to be that a person ought to be emotionally mature once they are 17 years old. Sexual maturity is no longer the determining factor, as it once was.

The reality is that most 20 to 30 year old males sought after younger company, and may have even been socially pressured to do so, especially in Christian circles. It's hard to determine whether Moore was truly predator-like, or whether he was simply acting as was expected of a Christian man at the time. Grooming a young wife, in order to have as many healthy children as possible, is a fundamentally Christian practise.

Hell, we are bringing in men from foreign countries who have married their wives a lot younger than 16. It's going to be a real shit-show once we start sorting that out.
 
Bannon took a hit. He was down there stumping for Statutory Roy. He got a little too full of himself thinking he could stump Roy to a victory.
If Bannon was smart he would not invested any political capital in Statutory Roy and just sat it out. Now he is known as the guy who backed a creepy loser.
Given the laundry list of things people hate Bannon for, this is just another line item. Bannon's major issue beyond what people here consider the obvious is his near fanatical desire to deconstruct the Right and eliminate the Left altogether. That sort of fanaticism is what will continue to lead him down such obviously bad choices for backing.

Bannon isn't retarded. Even if his goal was as nefariously supremacist as people here love to claim, he knows full well that won't happen on any grand scale so advocating for such is a waste of resources. Right now, he's fighting his own little war on two fronts.
 
The headlines today on Breitbart are hilarious.

"Trump tweet: 'I knew Roy couldn't win'"
"Moore refuses to concede . . . Military votes not yet counted!"
"Breitbart 'Bama Liverwire: Republican saboteurs flip seat to Dems!"
Typical dishonest right wing media.
This is why tribalism will bite you in the ass. You supported a creep and the said creep lost. It’s ok to say sure this guy is on my team but I can not with a good conscience vote for him. Some on the right did exactly that and are better for it.
 
Given the laundry list of things people hate Bannon for, this is just another line item. Bannon's major issue beyond what people here consider the obvious is his near fanatical desire to deconstruct the Right and eliminate the Left altogether. That sort of fanaticism is what will continue to lead him down such obviously bad choices for backing.

Bannon isn't retarded. Even if his goal was as nefariously supremacist as people here love to claim, he knows full well that won't happen on any grand scale so advocating for such is a waste of resources. Right now, he's fighting his own little war on two fronts.
I actually like some of Bannon’s ideas but like I said after the allegations the smart move would have to stop backing that horse because the risk is not worth the reward.
 
I actually like some of Bannon’s ideas but like I said after the allegations the smart move would have to stop backing that horse because the risk is not worth the reward.
Agreed.
 
Oh, for the record @oleDirtyBast4rd is also wrong about the age of consent laws in Alabama everyone. Again, anyone surprised?

16

Age of consent is incredibly important in Alabama. An individual who is 19 years old or older has sexual contact with someone who is younger than 16 but older than 12 has committed sexual abuse.
 
Actually it does. It has all throughout human history. Keep virtue signaling
If disapproving of fucking children is virtue signaling, I don't see why virtue signaling is a bad thing.


@VivaRevolution this might be relevant to your discussion with @Daverisimo on how terms like virtue signaling are used to attempt to shut down arguments rather than debate them.

And per census data, the average age difference in marriages in the 1850s was under 5 years (similar trends in the UK). We don't have census data reaching through all of history, but similar trends hold from the information we do have. Even polygymous cultures tended to marry within 5-10 years of their own age most of the time. Marriages with large age gaps were more common historically, but not as common as you claim.

And marrying 14 year olds has also not been consistently approved historically. The starting age dipped in Tudor England, but before that, 18+ was considered normal, not 14. Younger marriages with big gaps were the exception, mostly occuring in the nobility, not the rule.
.
 
Back on topic of Roy Moore getting pwnt last night and how terrible a candidate he was.

25299518_10159780126290088_2727200632632376816_n.jpg
This is amazing.
 
Back
Top