AI is evolving fast. Can now create videos of anything through text

Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

  • Good

  • Bad

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.
Soon enough you won't be able to trust anything you haven't seen with your own eyes. It'll be pre-radio rules. It's gonna be interesting first time a lawyer argues that the video evidence can't be admissible as there is no way to tell of it's real or AI generated.
 
I think it is good. Like everyone else I'm not sure how this will all workout but historically America has had good success adapting, using new technology.

An article I saw the other day which I enjoyed ~

John Stossel: AI is coming for your job?​



The media warn, "Artificial intelligence will replace millions of jobs."

In San Francisco, Teamsters protest, demanding the government "protect" their jobs. In my new video, they chant, "Do not have these self-driving vehicles on San Francisco streets, taking jobs!"

They're complaining about the Waymo driverless taxis already in use in part of San Francisco (and Phoenix).


The union is right to worry. Robot cars don't get tired. They don't take lunch breaks. They don't drink or get distracted. Self-driving cars will replace many delivery-driver jobs, taxi jobs, Uber jobs and truck driver jobs.

Texas is building a special highway with a lane just for self-driving trucks.

The idea isn't just to save money by having machines do what people do now, but to get human drivers off the road entirely.

Safety advocates want that, because despite publicity over occasional robot-car crashes, we humans make many more mistakes. Robo-cars will save thousands of lives.

But when I said that in this column last month, some of you said government officials will soon use "safety" as an excuse to outlaw human driving.

"Regulators will try to ban traditional cars," writes orangecrate26. "You're not taking my Mustang, or my guns."

Government will have "total control of your movement," writes another. "No movement at all if you think the wrong way."

It's a threat I hadn't considered.

Because lots of you like driving, and politicians fear upsetting big voting groups, I assumed government wouldn't ban human driving altogether.

But I've been wrong about state intrusions before.

What I haven't been wrong about is the job loss.

Some people will lose jobs because of AI.

But history suggests that most will find better jobs.

More than 90% of America's workers once worked on farms. Better farm equipment replaced most of those jobs. Today, only about 1% of Americans work on farms.

Are the former farmers out of work? No, most found other jobs, better jobs — jobs less demanding and dangerous than farming.

There were once half a million typists in America. Nearly all those jobs are gone.


So are thousands of phone and elevator operator jobs.

Bank tellers were replaced by ATM machines and online banking.

Video rental stores were killed by streaming services.

But after those people lost jobs, there was no surge in unemployment.

In fact, over the past 15 years, unemployment has dropped. Wages, adjusted for inflation, are up. No union predicted that.

It happened because, as machines took jobs that humans once did, people searched for different, better work. Most found it.....
I find it repugnant that some people will just shrug at the idea of regulation crowding out human drivers.
Fuck forced technology.
 
In what way is this AI, and not just a really good application? How is this artificial intelligence as opposed to a different program into which I type instructions? Because the instructions can be typed in English and not command line?

How does this make it intelligence?
 
Hummmm. I have some books with some interesting text. And I can add some sentence too..if you know what I mean.

War and Porn, that´s all tech is about
 
Inevitably I think this is good for creatives and horrendous for trained artists. We will have a freedom from the normalized genres and see an explosion in new concepts while cinema/art becomes less reliant on being industry driven. It could end up resembling anime in Japan with very little limitations on what flies but people would have to become more discerning. I think it will become apparent very quickly who is going to oversaturate the market and who will be a credit to it. Not everyone wants to write a book or make a movie, and I have seen some people using Chatgpt outright display that they have the creative intelligence of a brick.
 
My favorite thing about tech, is that these dorky fuckasses still havent figured out a way to get laid. Found different ways to enjoy fucking their hands, but never anything that can actually help them.

And the video sucked. Clearly fake, not impressed.
AI looks like shit.
 
I think it is good. Like everyone else I'm not sure how this will all workout but historically America has had good success adapting, using new technology.

An article I saw the other day which I enjoyed ~

John Stossel: AI is coming for your job?​



The media warn, "Artificial intelligence will replace millions of jobs."

In San Francisco, Teamsters protest, demanding the government "protect" their jobs. In my new video, they chant, "Do not have these self-driving vehicles on San Francisco streets, taking jobs!"

They're complaining about the Waymo driverless taxis already in use in part of San Francisco (and Phoenix).


The union is right to worry. Robot cars don't get tired. They don't take lunch breaks. They don't drink or get distracted. Self-driving cars will replace many delivery-driver jobs, taxi jobs, Uber jobs and truck driver jobs.

Texas is building a special highway with a lane just for self-driving trucks.

The idea isn't just to save money by having machines do what people do now, but to get human drivers off the road entirely.

Safety advocates want that, because despite publicity over occasional robot-car crashes, we humans make many more mistakes. Robo-cars will save thousands of lives.

But when I said that in this column last month, some of you said government officials will soon use "safety" as an excuse to outlaw human driving.

"Regulators will try to ban traditional cars," writes orangecrate26. "You're not taking my Mustang, or my guns."

Government will have "total control of your movement," writes another. "No movement at all if you think the wrong way."

It's a threat I hadn't considered.

Because lots of you like driving, and politicians fear upsetting big voting groups, I assumed government wouldn't ban human driving altogether.

But I've been wrong about state intrusions before.

What I haven't been wrong about is the job loss.

Some people will lose jobs because of AI.

But history suggests that most will find better jobs.

More than 90% of America's workers once worked on farms. Better farm equipment replaced most of those jobs. Today, only about 1% of Americans work on farms.

Are the former farmers out of work? No, most found other jobs, better jobs — jobs less demanding and dangerous than farming.

There were once half a million typists in America. Nearly all those jobs are gone.


So are thousands of phone and elevator operator jobs.

Bank tellers were replaced by ATM machines and online banking.

Video rental stores were killed by streaming services.

But after those people lost jobs, there was no surge in unemployment.

In fact, over the past 15 years, unemployment has dropped. Wages, adjusted for inflation, are up. No union predicted that.

It happened because, as machines took jobs that humans once did, people searched for different, better work. Most found it.....

Interesting though that the article still focuses on unionied blue collar jobs being lost when to me it looks like AI has much more potential to replace office jobs.

Self driving has already been pushed waaaaaay beyond its capabilities once and my guess is it will be again, I think your dealing with a situation were mistakes are so disastrous that human involvement is likely to be desired long term, if only to keep an eye on AI systems.

The reality seems to be that robotisation is lagging way behind computing power, if not in tech then at least in cost to the degree a lot of blue collar jobs are not likely t5o be economical to replace anytime soon. Office work on the other hand you have VAST amounts of people doing jobs which seem like they only exist because creating a program to replace them would be too expensive, my guess is AI is potentially coming for millions of such jobs.

I wonder whether the commentary will switch when/if the job loses start to be felt by middle class white collar people, I suspect it may well do although equally I think at the higher end such jobs already have loads of proection.
 
titanic-privilege.gif
 
This is what happens when you stigmatize bullying. Now the nerds are gonna turn us all into dopamine slaves and/or kill us all.
 
Wow, that was way better and more advanced than I expected.

I think they have chosen the best results out of a large set of generated videos to showcase the tech. Still impressive though.
 
No actors, no voice actors, no animation studios, no graphic designers, no translators, no one will ever learn another language again. No musicians, no artists, no architects, no programmers. Etc etc.

Within 10 years at most.
 
Back
Top