Crime Ahmaud Arbery shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.

PolishHeadlock2

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Messages
22,680
Reaction score
25,909
This shooting happened in February and was reassigned twice because of conflicts of interest. The current prosecutor recommended a grand jury when the video leaked but why does this even require a grand jury? It seems pretty clear these guys should be prosecuted





https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/05/us/ahmaud-arbery-killing-georgia.html





Warning this is a video of the shooting, I picked this tweet because it had the least




ATLANTA — A Georgia prosecutor said on Tuesday that a grand jury should decide whether to bring charges in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old unarmed black man who was pursued by two white men and shot in southern Georgia in February.

“After careful review of the evidence,” the prosecutor, Tom Durden, of Georgia’s Atlantic Judicial Circuit, wrote in a statement, “I am of the opinion that the case should be presented to the grand jury of Glynn County for consideration of criminal charges.”

Mr. Arbery was killed after the men confronted him while he was running in the Satilla Shores neighborhood just outside of Brunswick, in Glynn County. Neither man was arrested after the slaying, which occurred on Feb. 23 at about 1 p.m.

A graphic video of the shooting surfaced online on Tuesday. Taken from inside a vehicle, it shows Mr. Arbery running along a shady two-lane residential road when he comes upon a white truck, with a man standing beside its open driver’s-side door. Another man is in the bed of the pickup. Mr. Arbery runs around the truck and disappears briefly from view. Muffled shouting can be heard before Mr. Arbery emerges, tussling with the man outside the truck as three shotgun blasts echo.

ADVERTISEMENT
00georgia-shooting2-threeByTwoSmallAt2X-v2.jpg

According to a police report, one of the men, Gregory McMichael, said that he saw Mr. Arbery running through his neighborhood and thought that he looked like the suspect in a rash of nearby break-ins. Mr. McMichael, 64, told the authorities that he and his son, Travis McMichael, 34, armed themselves and began chasing him in a truck.

Mr. Arbery’s family and friends said Mr. Arbery was an avid jogger, and they do not believe he committed a crime before being chased.

ADVERTISEMENT
Anger over the case has been building among civil rights activists and others, with the Rev. Al Sharpton calling for an investigation, and state and local N.A.A.C.P. leaders calling for the arrest of the McMichaels.

“This is very grave and very serious judicial malpractice,” James Woodall, the president of the Georgia N.A.A.C.P., said on Tuesday afternoon.

In a statement, Andrea Young, executive director of the A.C.L.U. of Georgia, said “the vigilante behavior that we saw in Brunswick is unacceptable in a civilized society.”

A spokesman for the Glynn County Police Department could not be reached for comment on Tuesday.

Mr. Durden said in a statement that the case should go before a Glynn County grand jury once the state judicial system allows such bodies to be empaneled again. Because of the coronavirus pandemic, the Georgia Supreme Court has prohibited grand juries from meeting through June 12.

ADVERTISEMENT
Mr. Durden said he made his decision after “careful review of the evidence,” and after consulting with the Glynn County Police Department, the F.B.I., the United States attorney for the Southern District of Georgia and the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia.

Mr. Durden is the third prosecutor to be assigned to the case after the first two recused themselves because of professional ties to Gregory McMichael.

Mr. McMichael had recently retired after a long career as an investigator in the Brunswick district attorney’s office. He had also worked for seven years as an officer in the Glynn County Police Department.

One of the prosecutors who was previously assigned to the case, George E. Barnhill of the Waycross Judicial District, had advised the police that there was insufficient probable cause to arrest Mr. Arbery’s pursuers, arguing that they had acted legally under the state’s citizen arrest and self-defense statutes, according to documents obtained by The New York Times.

ADVERTISEMENT
Mr. Barnhill eventually asked to be removed from the case because his son worked in the Waycross prosecutor’s office with Gregory McMichael.

Mr. McMichael told the police that he and his son pulled up near Mr. Arbery, that his son got out of the truck with the shotgun, and that his son and Mr. Arbery then fought over the weapon, “at which point Travis fired a shot and then a second later there was a second shot.”

Last month, Travis McMichael declined to comment, citing the investigation. Attempts to reach Gregory McMichael were unsuccessful.

In a letter to the Police Department, Mr. Barnhill described a video made by a third man who had joined the McMichaels in “hot pursuit” of Mr. Arbery. Mr. Merritt, the lawyer for Mr. Arbery’s family, said he believed that the video disseminated on Tuesday was the same one Mr. Barnhill mentioned.

ADVERTISEMENT
The video that appeared on the internet on Tuesday is about a half-minute long and appears to be taken by someone riding or driving in a vehicle as it heads down a street in the Satilla Shores neighborhood.

In the video, the man standing in the bed of the truck is armed with a pistol and the man standing beside the driver’s door is holding a shotgun. He can be seen wrestling with Mr. Arbery in the street.

A gunshot is heard, and the two men momentarily disappear from the frame. Then there is the sound of a second gunshot. As the two men fight, a third shot is fired. Mr. Arbery tries to run, but staggers and falls to the pavement after a few steps.
 
Pretty incredible that it took more than two months for this to become national news.

Best case scenario (for the shooter/aggressors) is that this was an unarmed burglar who they chased down and shot dead despite there being no imminent danger to them. Worst case scenario - and the scenario that seems more likely based on (1) the victim's attire and (2) the aggressors' 9-1-1 call - is that these two homeboys saw a black man running in a white neighborhood, assumed he was a criminal, tried to illegally detain him at gunpoint, and then murdered him in the street.
 
These dudes should absolutely go to jail. I'm 95% sure they have no grounds for a legitimate citizens arrest. The timing of the alleged crime to when these nutjobs decided to attempt the arrest. The bringing of firearms, which are deadly weapons, to arrest an individual that they knew had not committed a crime of violence. So forth and so on.

Lock 'em up. It's just short of premeditated murder to me. hyperbole, don't at me bitches.
 
I saw this earlier dude was jogging. Wtf Georgia.
 
Shooters deserve to be executed. There's no excuse or justification for this.
 
And yet here we are with some people in the U.S. claiming racism isn't bad.
 
Looks like the prosecutors are trying to cover up a modern lynching.
 
Who recorded this video


In the article

"In a letter to the Police Department, Mr. Barnhill described a video made by a third man who had joined the McMichaels in “hot pursuit” of Mr. Arbery. Mr. Merritt, the lawyer for Mr. Arbery’s family, said he believed that the video disseminated on Tuesday was the same one Mr. Barnhill mentioned."
 
I probably shouldn't have watched that video, it was more graphic than I expected it to be. I had no idea "citizens arrest" was even a real thing these days. That looks like 2nd degree murder to me.
 
shit like this depresses the hell out of me man
 
Looks like the prosecutors are trying to cover up a modern lynching.

Bingo. This was a damn lynching. And reading the details of this incident and subsequently seeing the video had my blood boiling.
 
Looks like the prosecutors are trying to cover up a modern lynching.

That's a murder in broad daylight. I bet these guys get the harsh punishment the murderers of Emmett Till got.......in 2020.........
 
So this guy was stealing shit from a construction site, got caught and took off running and then attacked a man with a gun in hopes of getting away?
 
What am I not understanding here? Two rednecks in a truck chased after a guy running on the road and shot him dead and now they are getting prosecuted for murder. Okay?
 
Family said he was an avid jogger, what they didn't mention was that he liked to jog after stealing other people's property.
 
shit like this depresses the hell out of me man
And the worst thing is the people who will defend them and the justice system that goes soft on them.
 
What am I not understanding here? Two rednecks in a truck chased after a guy running on the road and shot him dead and now they are getting prosecuted for murder. Okay?

They aren't being prosecuted at this point.

The prosecutor jus recommended a grand jury (grand juries are called when a Prosecutor thinks that the evidence to prosecute is just iffy) and this happened in February
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top