Elections After Shooting, ABC, CBS and NBC Blast Trump with 95% Bad Press

[RoastBeast]

You'd think this would be a massive story but the MSM just touched on it and moved right along with what they were doing.

But the MSM is fair and balanced so I'm sure they'd do the same thing if it was Kamala instead of Trump.

 

[kflo]

The media can choose what they cover, but by and large the same Big 3: ABC, NBC, CBS, and also virtually all newspapers choose to cover the same stories in the same order and it's been that way for at least a decade. They could easily have covered a myriad of positive issues / stories that are positive to Trump and negative to Hillary, Biden, Harris over the 3 campaigns. It's been this way from the time he walked down the stairs. The good press for Trump is never delivered, while the bad press for the Democrats is also never delivered. For some of you to claim that is normal or not by design makes you a dupe. They could have covered the success of Trump's border policy, or vaccine creation, or jobless numbers, or First Step Act, or de-escalation of wars, or energy independence when it was happening, or a myriad of other topics in the past... they didn't. But, you find a meaningless story about cats and dogs that will effect no one and they can't get over it, because it delivers the results they are looking for... and that is the point. The broadcast news media has a specific agenda and they have for decades. Democrats / Globalists good... opposition bad. It would be interesting to know how American voters would vote if we didn't have a propaganda are as our "Free Press" for the Left.

You want to just dismiss the former president and current republican nominee saying (legal) immigrants are eating out cats, our dogs, our pets during the most watched political event we have? He’s his own worst enemy. And unfortunately that’s just who he is, unapologetically. It was completely irresponsible.

 

[D 1 Wrestler]

"nobody watches MSM anymore, look at CNN's shit ratings "


"Waaaah why is all the news anti trump "

 

[Last Falconry]

you're asking people to extend a courtesy to this guy that he wouldn't extend to anyone else alive, under threat of torture, including members of his own family. suck my dick to completion you whingy twat

 

[DoctorTaco]

You didn't. A poor assumption on my part. Pardon me

I’ll pardon you faster than my crackhead son with gun charges, Don’t worry

 

[Barteh]

you're asking people to extend a courtesy to this guy that he wouldn't extend to anyone else alive, under threat of torture, including members of his own family. suck my dick to completion you whingy twat

Go see a psychiatrist man the derangement is unreal.

 

[Last Falconry]

Go see a psychiatrist man the derangement is unreal.

 

[Hellowhosthat]

America has left wing media and right wing media. As long as you have that the news stations will continue to pander to their audiences.

 

[NickNick]

What is positive to report on him for?

 

[Striderxdj]

What is positive to report on him for?

His crowd sizes and merch sales.

 

[JonnyBonesPharmacist]

it's just so unfair.

they're eating our dogs!

They eat dogs, you eat dongs. Pretty close to fair

 

[BFoe]

Both the threads on the Butler attempt and the one last weekend tuned into another TDS megathread very quickly.

And Trump and the GOP’s “kinder, gentler rhetoric” flew the fuck out the window very quickly. Funny how that works.

 

[djacobox372]

Why do the two have to do with each other? did conservative media all of a sudden start praising Pelosi when she was a target and her husband was bludgeoned with a hammer?

No, they made fun of it, and laughed about it.. at least the "liberal" media doesn't giggle and make fun of trump being a target.

Trump is a POS that lies a lot, getting shot at or almost shot doesn't change that. Perhaps if he was less of a POS and lied less, he'd have fewer wacko's willing to trade their lives to take his.

 

[BFoe]

America has left wing media and right wing media. As long as you have that the news stations will continue to pander to their audiences.

Yup. We used to have something called the Fairness Doctrine which required that when media covered any topic of national importance, they had to cover both sides of the issue. That went away in the late 1980s and it’s been all downhill since. Oddly enough, when I advocate for bringing it back, most conservatives disagree with me citing “free speech concerns.” So they want their media to be free to be biased but also whine about any other perceived bias.

 

[Deleted member 585708]

Does America even have an unbiased media outlet of any repute?

If not, I don't know why it keeps 'surprising' people.

Most of the outlets seem to be pretty clearly left or right.

 

[Deleted member 585708]

Yup. We used to have something called the Fairness Doctrine which required that when media covered any topic of national importance, they had to cover both sides of the issue. That went away in the late 1980s and it’s been all downhill since. Oddly enough, when I advocate for bringing it back, most conservatives disagree with me citing “free speech concerns.” So they want their media to be free to be biased but also whine about any other perceived bias.

Freeze Peach Good! But then Freeze Peach Bad....

 

[jefferz]

You do realize that media organizations aren't obligated to report everything 50/50, right? If one candidate is saying insane shit day after day, while the other candidate isn't, the media it isn't political bias to point that out.

You want "positive" stories about Trump? Get someone to tell him to stop pushing a racist lie that's hurting people in a town he pretends to care about.

Did you know, there actually used to be a law called the Fairness Doctrine that required the media to give 50/50 coverage.
You can thank ol Ronnie Regan for getting rid of it.

 

[Beechwood]

I'm glad a lot of these old, legacy media outlets are trimming down, cutting jobs. They are so dishonest. It isn't surprising to me that many Americans have stopped trusting them and getting their news from elsewhere.

Sad to see the blue media is overwhelmingly biased against Trump, in particular after the second assassination attempt on his life. The Democrat media is afraid that Trump will gain support due to the attempt to murder him I'm guessing.

The blue media views their job not as reporting the news but shaping the news instead.

 

[K1levelgrappler]

Why isn’t there more positive media coverage of arsonists and bank robbers?

 

[BFoe]

I'm glad a lot of these old, legacy media outlets are trimming down, cutting jobs. They are so dishonest. It isn't surprising to me that many Americans have stopped trusting them and getting their news from elsewhere.

Sad to see the blue media is overwhelmingly biased against Trump, in particular after the second assassination attempt on his life. The Democrat media is afraid that Trump will gain support due to the attempt to murder him I'm guessing.

The blue media views their job not as reporting the news but shaping the news instead.

Oh, that’s the “blue media” that does that? Interesting.
Let’s look at how biased Fox and Newsmax is, and also how accurate they are (not),

Fox News (foxnews.com) - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Newsmax - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com