• Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Opinion African Countries Are Failing to Make a Dent in Washington’s Diplomatic Scene

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@Black
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,367
Reaction score
6,587
It’s partly a question of resources, but it’s also about political will and hustle.
LEGO-Discovery-Center-DC-Mini-World.jpg

The Washington calendar is filled with get-togethers for the diplomatic set, from embassy parties to book launches to private dinners with policymakers. Each gathering is a chance to network, sometimes with very powerful people, or at least glean gossip from their underlings.

But in a city teeming with people determined to garner attention for their causes or constituencies, one group is largely absent from such conversations: African diplomats.

It’s a phenomenon plenty of U.S. policymakers, foreign officials and even some African diplomats privately acknowledge. Many of them also argue it must change if African countries want the U.S. attention so many say they crave — not to mention more respect.
eac4eac0-c77f-43df-b9d9-3d2293f6f467.jpg

A sign of the status quo: Even though Kenyan President William Ruto is being honored with a state visit to Washington next week, House Speaker Mike Johnson rejected requests that he be allowed to deliver a speech to a joint session of Congress.
“D.C. is a playing field. You’ve got to be on the field playing the game. I don’t see too many African diplomats on the field,” one European diplomat told me.

African diplomats say they’d like to be more prominent in the U.S. capital, but that, above all, they lack the resources.

Many of their embassies have just a handful of diplomats. Those diplomats often are underpaid; some take side jobs in Washington such as Uber or delivery drivers, or even at gas stations, according to a current and a former State Department official familiar with the issue.

The limited resources affect an embassy’s ability to function, including whether it can have a decent website, host events to draw in influential people or have a public affairs officer. (I reached out to nearly every African embassy and the African Union mission for this column. Just seven responded in any fashion. A few emails bounced.)
650d02aef9b1ca34bb7868c6a43e5ee2.jpg

“Some embassies go months without getting their allowances because there’s no funding from back home,” one African diplomat said, noting that while some of the embassies host events, they do so “rarely.”

We’re talking about a continent of 54 countries — more than a fourth of the world’s nations. In theory, there should be strength in such a number, but in reality there’s not much unity.

Each African country has unique interests, and many are rivals. Northern African countries such as Egypt also tend to align more with the Middle East and Arab countries, putting them in a separate orbit than sub-Saharan African countries.

Some of the countries have had recent coups or are otherwise not in great standing in D.C. Those diplomats can, however, be found attending a party at the Russian ambassador’s house. (The food was great, the conversations surreal.)

Rwanda, South Africa and Kenya were mentioned by Africa watchers as among the more robust diplomatic performers. But the majority of the embassies tend to stay under the radar.
LV109572-1.jpg

Elsie Kanza, Tanzania’s ambassador since 2021, is considered one of the more dynamic African envoys in Washington, but she said funding, staffing and time can constrain her. There are fewer than 10 diplomats in her embassy, she told me, and she delegates when she can.

She also said some African ambassadors prefer keeping their work behind the scenes. “I have colleagues who have no interest in attending any events, but they’re very impactful in terms of what it is they’re delivering for their countries,” she said.

At the same time, according to some current and former U.S. officials I spoke to, many African embassies stick so closely to diplomatic protocol that they hurt their interests in Washington. (Most of the people interviewed for this column were granted anonymity to be candid about a sensitive issue.)

a042412f1a103533385df775a3fb2800.jpg

African diplomats may believe that the best way to reach the undersecretary of State is to contact the State Department’s desk officer for their country. In reality, it’s probably better to ask a think tanker you met at a party for the undersecretary’s WhatsApp number.

“When you play the game by the rules, you’re not really playing the game,” said Cameron Hudson, a former National Security Council official who dealt with Africa.

He and others who’ve held similar roles noted that they often were the ones reaching out to African embassies instead of the other way around. “Honestly, I heard from my counterparts in Western European embassies with 10 times the frequency that I heard from counterparts in African embassies,” Hudson said.

And while the African Union has a mission in Washington, it is far less prominent than, say, the European Union’s delegation, and policymakers say it has little ability to rally the dozens of countries under its umbrella.
images

There are embassies representing countries from other parts of the world, such as Latin America or parts of Asia, that also keep a low profile. (Has anyone seen the Turkmen ambassador lately?) But because the U.S. has stronger trade and military ties in countries in those regions, it’s more likely to engage them in a variety of ways than African countries.

Some African diplomats are severely restricted by orders from their bosses back home. Those bosses also can further disempower their diplomats by spending — often scarce — resources on expensive Washington lobbyists instead of strengthening their embassies.

Sometimes the lobbyists are hired to carry out some of the shadier work — trying to place op-ed pieces whitewashing a dictator’s crimes, or talking to lawmakers about lifting sanctions on that dictator. But often, they rake in dollars to do the basic work of diplomacy, such as arranging facetime with American officials.

“Save your money,” one former U.S. diplomat who focused on Africa said. “You’re signing contracts with people who you do not need in order to get meetings with us.”

There’s also a bit of a chicken-and-egg dilemma in all of this.

Despite Africa’s potential — its demographics alone make it worth watching — it’s just not high on Washington’s priority list. President Joe Biden may not visit the continent during this term, although several of his top aides and Vice President Kamala Harris have made trips. Few members of Congress care about African issues. And that’s even with U.S. concern about China and Russia’s influence on the continent.

Johnson’s office assured me the decision on the Ruto speech was about scheduling restraints and stressed that the Kenyan president would get lots of facetime with lawmakers. But when I asked a senior African diplomat if he was upset that Ruto wouldn’t get to speak to Congress, he said, glumly, that he never expected it would happen in the first place.




maxresdefault.jpg

At the moment in Africa, there is a vicious war in Sudan, with human rights activists warning of famine and genocide. But it’s not getting nearly the attention from Washington as the Israel-Hamas war in the Middle East.

As a result, African diplomats often wonder if it’s worth the effort to get more attention from lawmakers or others beyond the core few they already know. I sometimes get the sense that they worry that if they host a gathering in Washington, no one will show up.

At the same time, many feel shut out by Washington’s elite.

“You think D.C. is big? Actually, D.C. is very small. For you to actually make an impact your presence has to be known by all sectors,” the senior African diplomat said. But African diplomats are “not included in the inner circles. They’re not invited to critical meetings. They’re sidelined at best.”

Sometimes the State Department engages directly with an African country’s capital without looping in the embassy in Washington, the diplomat complained.

Such lamentation is understandable, but to break through this cycle of low expectations will require more African diplomatic firepower in Washington.

That could mean some entrepreneurial African diplomats need to start cold-calling a few Washington socialites about getting on their invite lists, persuading think-tankers to share their Rolodexes or building a tradition of hosting gatherings at their embassies.

If there’s anything in shortage in Washington, it’s attention, a former Asian diplomat said.

“You have to get out and get that attention,” he said. “It takes hustle.”

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/05/16/african-diplomats-washington-column-00158231
 
African diplomats may believe that the best way to reach the undersecretary of State is to contact the State Department’s desk officer for their country. In reality, it’s probably better to ask a think tanker you met at a party for the undersecretary’s WhatsApp number.

“When you play the game by the rules, you’re not really playing the game,” said Cameron Hudson, a former National Security Council official who dealt with Africa.
Pretty much the most important information in the story, imo.

As we all know, power in Washington comes at the end of purse strings. Either you're spending for attention or you and your issues don't matter. Good or bad, in American politics, you get what you pay for.

On a larger geopolitical scale, I wonder how this compares to the relationship between African diplomats and China.
 
Pretty much the most important information in the story, imo.

As we all know, power in Washington comes at the end of purse strings. Either you're spending for attention or you and your issues don't matter. Good or bad, in American politics, you get what you pay for.

On a larger geopolitical scale, I wonder how this compares to the relationship between African diplomats and China.
- Even thoought those countries are poor, the ditactors have the means to live as kings, the fact that they dont invest in such important matter, just shows their onwn interests is to attain and retain power.

I will search about China, but wont get surprised if they pay for the foreign stafs.
 
Pretty much the most important information in the story, imo.

As we all know, power in Washington comes at the end of purse strings. Either you're spending for attention or you and your issues don't matter. Good or bad, in American politics, you get what you pay for.

On a larger geopolitical scale, I wonder how this compares to the relationship between African diplomats and China.
It's true. The Desk Officer is probably:

A) new to the job and isn't settled in.

B) getting ready for their next assignment.

Desk officers are FSOs. Therefore, most DC assignments for FSOs are 2 years (at most 3 years) in length. There is little continuity. Therefore, it is best to reach out to a long standing NGO or Think Tank to get in touch with actual policy makers.
 
- Even thoought those countries are poor, the ditactors have the means to live as kings, the fact that they dont invest in such important matter, just shows their onwn interests is to attain and retain power.

I will search about China, but wont get surprised if they pay for the foreign stafs.
Yes. China is able to pay their diplomatic staff.
 
On a larger geopolitical scale, I wonder how this compares to the relationship between African diplomats and China.

This is a good point.

If a leader of an African country seems support from the State Department (or Congress) they know that there will be human rights issues brought up. (Oh, you want USAID investment in building a new dam, improve your human rights record towards the ______ ethnic group, and we will talk)

China, in the other hand will not put such caveats on their diplomatic agreements. Rather, it will be "We will build you a dam in return for mining rights".

If you were the leader of an impoverished country, which would you choose?
 
- I mean the African Nations
A few years ago, there was a story out there that stated Cameroon couldn't pay rent for their embassy in DC.


I heard a rumor years ago that a particular poor country (not in Africa) couldn't pay their diplomatic staff. So, the staff relied on using their duty free status to buy goods on the local market and then immediately sell said goods for slightly less than the retail price.

The "profit" they made, they kept as their "salary".
 
A few years ago, there was a story out there that stated Cameroon couldn't pay rent for their embassy in DC.


I heard a rumor years ago that a particular poor country (not in Africa) couldn't pay their diplomatic staff. So, the staff relied on using their duty free status to buy goods on the local market and then immediately sell said goods for slightly less than the retail price.

The "profit" they made, they kept as their "salary".
- It's pretty sad this. We see those ditactors sporting riches that would make even Trump jeallows.
 
Back
Top