- Joined
- Mar 4, 2013
- Messages
- 6,602
- Reaction score
- 4,477
Nothing close to controversial, Dos Santos beat Stipe fair and square and the judges were right, as MMADecisions always reminds us.
Junior dos Santos def. Stipe Miocic :: UFC on Fox 13 :: MMA Decisions
JDS losing that fight was like impossible, would be a robbery.
MMA Decision also reminds us that those guys scored the fight for Stipe (or a draw):
Dallas Winston
BloodyElbow.com
BloodyElbow.com
Miocic
MMAJunkie.com
MMAJunkie.com
Miocic
It wouldn't have been a robbery had Miocic gotten the nod, or, more realistically, had the fight been a draw.
There are many decisions that are much more controversial than Miocic winning the first fight would have been, and after a couple days of outrage, Sherdog would be filled with hot takes threads titled "I didn't see any robbery, you could conceivably give the fight to the other guy, so it's not exactly controversial"
Even fights results that had everyone was fuming during the PBP threads now have people making threads a couple hours later to tell us that we don't know what we're looking at, and the "robber" actually easily won.
Look at Rodtang vs Superlek from yesterday, on the PBP thread almost everyone was giving the nod to Rodtang, and after the fight was over and Superlek given the win, then people started to come around and claim they're satisfied. Not the best example (because of the weird knock down in the second round that didn't get a replay from another angle), but since it was yesterday, might as well mention it.
For somewhat recent examples, see Sean O'Malley & Sterling (2nd fight obviously) vs Petr Yan, or Paddy Pimblett vs Jared Gordon
