Elections 80 to 100k at Your Next President's Rally in NJ

Cherry Brigand

Red Belt
@red
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Messages
9,508
Reaction score
20,388
Donald Trump recited all his greatest hits at a massive Saturday evening rally in Wildwood, NJ — but managed to avoid violating his court-imposed gag order by focusing on President Biden, whom he called a “total moron” and blamed for his web of legal troubles.

The crowd — which Wildwood officials estimated was between 80,000 and 100,000, a record for a Garden State political rally — cheered wildly throughout the long, but controlled speech

Sauce: NYPost
 
Donald Trump recited all his greatest hits at a massive Saturday evening rally in Wildwood, NJ — but managed to avoid violating his court-imposed gag order by focusing on President Biden, whom he called a “total moron” and blamed for his web of legal troubles.

The crowd — which Wildwood officials estimated was between 80,000 and 100,000, a record for a Garden State political rally — cheered wildly throughout the long, but controlled speech

Sauce: NYPost

You know how the internet works right?

"Lisa F**an, spokesperson for the city of Wildwood, told The Associated Press that she estimated a crowd of between 80,000 and 100,000 attendees, based off her own observations on the scene Saturday.

Very scientific. It's not like Trump cultists have a habit of exaggerating crowd sizes or anything.
 
That's nothing, the most popular candidate in electoral history is no stranger to massive rallies of his own, with tens of people in attendance at some of his rallies, and as many as 1/3 of them weren't even paid to be there.



iu
 
Still love how conservative dummies pretend that rally attendance is somehow evidence of anything.

You do realize rallies are a giant waste of time, and are attended either by retired boomers, or cultists with nothing better to do?
Most people have real life shit to worry about than to listen to some orange rapist shouting slogans at them to satisfy their little lizard brain.
 
If he's found guilty, isn't he going to be remanded to custody?
 
Never mind can't edit due to the dubs.

Apparently it was for supporting summary executions which, when phrased like that, was probably the wrong thing to do.
 
Back
Top