Noblet10
Purple Belt
They didn't attack me, but they were grabbing me from behind and holding my arms while that animal was still loose. i DID feel for my life, in a sense. i mean, i didnt have any back up on the way, and it was too crowded to get myself away. plus, i dont know about you, but i'm not turning my back to a situation like that. and all of this happened in less than 30 seconds. i didnt really have time to think, and surely didnt have time to judge how little force was required to save my ass.
Dude, I'm totally with you on this. If I was in charge of the law, you could have stomped his head in after it's over, but I'm admittedly a bit extreme. I am not a fan of violence, but my opinion is when someone behaves violently to me or my family or friends, I dish it out double. Now, the law has the opposite opinion, and it sucks.
I would insist that you only acted aggressively, because you feared for your life or bodily health. Technically, it doesn't matter whether you or him threw the first punch or made the first violent action. You were doing your job by trying to get him to pay his tab and leave. That is a fact. He picked you up by your shirt which is obviously him attempting at minimum to intimidate you, and he possibly could have hurt you if you hadn't reacted.
Also, his friends holding you is good for you. If his friends were against the fight, they would have held their boy back. I'd say that you expected them to hold you and let him hit you. That's kind of what I'm getting from that at least. They had no right holding you while their friend was loose. Keep with the I feared for my life and bodily health, and really emphasize that you stopped hitting him when he fell. You knew then he was no longer a threat.