hi bob once more,
i'm not up on what my learned fellow liberals think about Mrs. Warren's funding apparatus, so i won't comment on their thinking process.
if Mrs. Warren has said she'd cancel the debt via Executive Order, then that's all that needs to be said. what more needs to be said? the type of pen she'd use to sign the order with?
can an EO be challenged in the courts? sure it can, but Warren doesn't need to stipulate that.
i read in the NYT that candidate Joe Biden is the one accusing Warren of not being honest.
yes, well, lol....i guess he must be campaigning for the same nomination, so it makes sense he'd say that. if he loses Iowa and New Hampshire, he'd be in a difficult spot heading into South Carolina.
Elizabeth Warren would tax the daylights out of the .01%, and also tax the remaining .99% to pay for it all, along with a tax on businesses. that is to say, the burden will fall principally on the 1% and business owners.
so, there you have it.
her campaign is very different than Mr. Buttigeig's - who proposes lots of stuff and is quite mysterious as to where the funding for any of it comes from. you may not like Mrs. Warren's plans, but she has them.
she's not running Trump style (I have a plan. its a very, very good plan. its so good that i can't tell you about it yet, but when you see it, you're going to be so happy - you won't be able to stand being so happy. you'll be sick with happiness.).
- IGIT