- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 22,541
- Reaction score
- 47,048
Toxic masculinityWhere the fuck is Gen. Wesley Clark? At least prop up a candidate with some bawls
Toxic masculinityWhere the fuck is Gen. Wesley Clark? At least prop up a candidate with some bawls
I hope you know how much I dig you man but Bernie did not go soft. No one thinks that. It is a talking point with no truth to it.He went soft when push came to shove.
Cory Booker's "I am Spartacus" comment showed such a level of self-centered self-importance and delusion, that it actually mirrored comedy in it's over exaggeration.
Anyone should be skeptical of handing the levers of power over to someone with such a warped self-image.
Bernie, Trump, Hillary, and Biden were all in high school at the same time.Bernie is too old. He needs to give it up.
FtfyIt would end extremely well if his positions on economy weren't fucking awful and neoliberal*
Bernie, Trump, Hillary, and Biden were all in high school at the same time.
So go ahead and GTFO with that stupid shit
Hillary is living off the life blood of Haitian children while Trump has his arteries replaced bi-yearly.But Hillary and Trump have put a lot of effort into staying in excellent health so there's that.
Bernie, Trump, Hillary, and Biden were all in high school at the same time.
So go ahead and GTFO with that stupid shit
Even though this by TYT its well worth the watch. Beto is poop.
I don't think he's ever come off as that charismatic and sometimes even tone deaf. I would be surprised if he got it.
If that's the criteria of how we slim out the field, that says more about the public than that candidate
So the fact that the people won't choose Booker because he is both uncharismatic and tone deaf you see as valid.
Why is his delusional "I am Sparticus" moment not a valid reason to reject Cory Booker?
By your own words:
I think this statement by you is absolutely wrong. You're faulting the public for being able to identify a troubling personality trait for anyone that would seek power.
I hope you know how much I dig you man but Bernie did not go soft. No one thinks that. It is a talking point with no truth to it.
Bernie did the right thing in trying to avoid the social and moral catastrophe of a Trump presidency. It was the right thing to so even if it did not work out.
But Hillary and Trump have put a lot of effort into staying in excellent health so there's that.
Don’t care to start a thread but just saw this article about just how much outside money poured in to flip those seats in the midterms. 51% of dem money came from out of the state where the race was held, 33% for republicans.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ey-behind-flipped-house-districts/2269831002/
Got a kick out of the retired teacher who decided to give all of her money to out of state democrats instead of leaving it for her kids.
Since at least 2010, the new norm is nationalized local campaign. Money is strategically used towards races whether the local candidate knows it or not.
Where the fuck is Gen. Wesley Clark? At least prop up a candidate with some bawls
Yeah, not sure how I feel about that. In state is one thing but having some rich dude across the country having that much sway in who gets elected to represent me in a local election doesn’t sit well.
WASHINGTON—Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Monday announced the formation of an exploratory committee for president, making her the first top-tier candidate to make a formal move toward running for the 2020 Democratic nomination.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren became the most prominent Democratic candidate to launch an exploratory committee for president on Monday, joining former HUD Secretary Julián Castroand several other Democrats who have already announced their intent to challenge President Trump in 2020.