- Joined
- Mar 17, 2007
- Messages
- 20,950
- Reaction score
- 12,901
They spammed me with seizure gifs in private convo for the 3rd time.
Oh, like things designed for people with epilepsy to get hurt by?
Do those actually work?
They spammed me with seizure gifs in private convo for the 3rd time.
So your a puffed up glorified stock boy ?
You are such a hufflepuff
Oh, like things designed for people with epilepsy to get hurt by?
Do those actually work?
Link up a pic. I'm trying to imagine that with the ass-length dreads you've surely got.![]()
<{cruzshake}>No dreads I started thinning a few years back and locks of loved it but I did have long ass hair down my back
SO i have a civil war beard a winter hat I hear like a dwarf cut off combat pants shorts that stop six inches above my ankle and orange soccer socks
Use your imagination
Yup.
who did it?
No, I'm a coordinator.
No dreads I started thinning a few years back and locks of loved it but I did have long ass hair down my back
SO i have a civil war beard a winter hat I hear like a dwarf cut off combat pants shorts that stop six inches above my ankle and orange soccer socks
Use your imagination
So people arent born male and female ?
Hmm. That's what you got out of that?
That kind of disingenuous argument is part of the problem here. If you make a sincere effort to understand what is being said, you don't get the weird arguments. I understand that you want to deny the distinction between gender and sex (don't know the reason, though). Why is it hard for you to acknowledge that linguistically there is a distinction (and further that people who understand the word "gender" to mean what the dictionary says it means aren't saying anything about biology)? This is one argument that I think completely dissolves if people approach it with intellectual honesty (in that there is little to no real disagreement).
What about hermaphrodites, intersex, and other DSDs?
What about them? Sex can be a little weird, too, but this argument is really just about the meaning of the word "gender", while it is often dishonestly framed as an argument about biology (which would make no sense).
Hmm. That's what you got out of that?
That kind of disingenuous argument is part of the problem here. If you make a sincere effort to understand what is being said, you don't get the weird arguments. I understand that you want to deny the distinction between gender and sex (don't know the reason, though). Why is it hard for you to acknowledge that linguistically there is a distinction (and further that people who understand the word "gender" to mean what the dictionary says it means aren't saying anything about biology)? This is one argument that I think completely dissolves if people approach it with intellectual honesty (in that there is little to no substantive disagreement).
lol
So Chris is just dishonest or is he also an idiot?
I think Chris is both smart and honest.
Like @AgonyandIrony ?I'm a stand-up philsopher.
And does that mean that you're not allowed to question him on any issue, even when he is openly misrepresenting an argument?
Like @AgonyandIrony ?