It's not a million times different. I like you but I feel like I'm in la la land here. If the women are being raped at an 80% clip, which is probably close to the percentage of women raped in a sacked city during the bronze age (extremely high), they are being raped by someone, and first speculation goes with the men making the journey along the way.He was accusing Mexico of sending their rapists to the USA, that is a million miles different than the statement that illegal immigrants are getting raped by other immigrants on the way here.
Not only is it different, the intent of the message is also totally different, one is to paint illegals as being dangerous because they are rapists (false they are not rapists more than any other group) while the other is to highlight the dangers that illegals face in coming over here. Its blatantly obvious which one Trump was going for.
Trump may not have quoted the 80% figure but that is the study/article he referenced when trying to defend his nonsensical statement. Present company excluded, I would hazard a guess that most people worried about illegals don't give a rats ass about their welfare, at the very least that is not what trump was shooting for.
The problem was the way everything was worded, not the intent. No other candidate will touch the issues that illegal immigration brings. Trump went too far, but maybe that's needed. Every other politician wanted to pander, hoping to win votes (short of maybe Ted Cruz).