- Joined
- Jul 16, 2007
- Messages
- 49,276
- Reaction score
- 2,462
so the media wouldnt be criticizing/attacking trump without a conspiracy going on?
Strawman
so the media wouldnt be criticizing/attacking trump without a conspiracy going on?
Still banging that drum, huh? Jesus.
This is why nobody believes a damn thing you say.
Meh, when someone else wants to discuss it. You've had me in your little box for months and the one time I've asked you to actually back up one of your accusations you claimed it would be too much work to actually get quotes of my exhibiting the behaviour you claim. I can tell your lifestyle doesn't allow you to spend much time around the forum though, so fair enough.
I still can't get on board. Whatever personality defects Trump has (he definitely has them) pale in comparison to someone who is completely rotten to the core.No, not just inexperience. Gross personal defects and general character flaws that have shown up throughout his life.
I'm fine with saying #NeverHillary or whatever you want, but dude, we cannot have Donald Trump as President or anything close to it.
Another poster posted this http://www.newsweek.com/2016/08/12/donald-trumps-business-failures-election-2016-486091.html -- the important thing in this article has nothing to do with the businesses failing or not, it has to do with Trump's character and behavior leading to those failures and responding to those failures and we are seeing this EXACT person in this election. This isn't an attempt to defame or attack him, it's just talking about him honestly. Trump still hasn't learned even the most basic policy. He never will.
But this is a clear pattern.... it doesn't matter what I say, I won't need to explain anything in another month or so, Trump might not even be in the race. He will continue to be who he is and expose himself nationally. Unfortunately, the other candidate sucks too... vote 3rd party.
WTF happened? He briefly held a lead after the GOP convention, got leapfrogged following the DNC, went on an absolute rampage of media blunders and inaccuracies.
It's almost hard to believe he even got nominated, and yet here we stand a couple weeks after he had a lead and the election looks all but lost. Hillary looks like someone who knows they've got this locked up and is just in cruise control now.
One terrorist attack and Trump is back in the game. Have faith in our Muslim brothers.
Strawman
A question can't be a strawman.
Right but the point he is attempting to make is based on a straw man interpretation of what I said
The question mark at the end provides you with an opportunity to clarify your position, though. Just replying "strawman" to a question makes it seem like you're tucking your tail and running from the discussion.
Don't be silly.
The answer to his question is "no where near this level". But he knew that.
Trump is a weak cuck bitch sucking Putin's cock like a whore. I'd rather have Obama and Hildawg drone striking fools daily.One terrorist attack and Trump is back in the game. Have faith in our Muslim brothers.
You don't have to believe me. It's objectively true. I've cited evidence before, but anyone paying attention can see it.
There is a philosophical issue, too. If Trump says something really stupid, and the media reports on it, is that a story that's biased against him? What if he says something stupid, the media reports on it, and also quotes someone defending it?