Elections 2016 Presidential Election General Discussion v3

Would you rather have a prior 2012 election candidate this year?

  • Rather would vote for both Obama and Romney over these candidates

    Votes: 16 32.0%

  • Rather would vote for Obama over options this year

    Votes: 15 30.0%

  • Rather would vote for Romney over options this year

    Votes: 4 8.0%

  • Prefer a candidate in current election over both Obama and Romney

    Votes: 15 30.0%
  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thurisaz said:
I own up to what I am and stand behind my words, that much is true. I have no clue why you consider me a bigot. While I'm not overly concerned with the reason or your opinion of me, an actual reason for it would be informative.
Click to expand...
As you said: "Historically, compared to other countries, the whiter America was, the greater America was. Demographics is destiny...The reality is that the only way to Make America Great Again is to Make America White Again. The two slogans are synonymous. The SJWs know it, which is why both slogans terrify them."

Your making a whiter america appear as a leading indicator that america was great (Which I'm going to leave behind, because I think its laughable that anyone thinks America isn't at its greatest right now). It completely ignores historical perspective and that blacks and other minorities weren't productive because of how they were being treated.

I think you consider yourself libertarian? Think about it this way. Your equivocating similarly as if someone who said that crime is down in a fully monitored police state. well no shit. But it ignores any and all pretense and actual reasoning behind why things are the way they want. If your argument is "look at how little black crime was when slaves were around" then no shit. But it has nothing to do with whites being superior than blacks or anything like that.

You use a false bigoted correlation to prove a (wrong- as in America is as great as its ever been) point. Hence bigot.
 
Hans Gruber said:
He was basically saying that a person that looks like he is from the Middle East could have a bomb strapped to his back but we don't say anything because we are worried about being accused of profiling.

The "bomb strapped to his back" portion is important in this context
Click to expand...
So according to trump we aren't stopping people because they look like they have a bomb strapped to their back?
 
Joe said:
So according to trump we aren't stopping people because they look like they have a bomb strapped to their back?
Click to expand...

Look at Syed Farook as an example of what he is talking about.

"Several of Syed Farook‘s neighbors told ABC News they noticed “suspicious activity” at the home of the San Bernardino shooter, as well as his mother’s home at another location. No reports were made, however, for fear of being accused of racial profiling."

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/syed-far...rt-suspicious-activity-for-fear-of-profiling/
 
ucunc156 said:
As you said: "Historically, compared to other countries, the whiter America was, the greater America was. Demographics is destiny...The reality is that the only way to Make America Great Again is to Make America White Again. The two slogans are synonymous. The SJWs know it, which is why both slogans terrify them."

Your making a whiter america appear as a leading indicator that america was great (Which I'm going to leave behind, because I think its laughable that anyone thinks America isn't at its greatest right now). It completely ignores historical perspective and that blacks and other minorities weren't productive because of how they were being treated.

I think you consider yourself libertarian? Think about it this way. Your equivocating similarly as if someone who said that crime is down in a fully monitored police state. well no shit. But it ignores any and all pretense and actual reasoning behind why things are the way they want. If your argument is "look at how little black crime was when slaves were around" then no shit. But it has nothing to do with whites being superior than blacks or anything like that.

You use a false bigoted correlation to prove a (wrong- as in America is as great as its ever been) point. Hence bigot.
Click to expand...
America was great if you were white. Well looking through rose colored glasses at that era. In trumps america non whites have to prove they are great Americans.
Hans Gruber said:
Look at Syed Farook as an example of what he is talking about.

"Several of Syed Farook‘s neighbors told ABC News they noticed “suspicious activity” at the home of the San Bernardino shooter, as well as his mother’s home at another location. No reports were made, however, for fear of being accused of racial profiling."

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/syed-far...rt-suspicious-activity-for-fear-of-profiling/
Click to expand...
That's not what trump is saying. He's saying the government is letting in people who look like they have bombs on planes to get on them because
They dont want to. That's why hes praising the Israeli practice of racial profiling of people who want to get on planes
 
Hans Gruber said:
Look at Syed Farook as an example of what he is talking about.

"Several of Syed Farook‘s neighbors told ABC News they noticed “suspicious activity” at the home of the San Bernardino shooter, as well as his mother’s home at another location. No reports were made, however, for fear of being accused of racial profiling."

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/syed-far...rt-suspicious-activity-for-fear-of-profiling/
Click to expand...
Suspicious activity is very different than suspicious looks. If you are profiling someone based on their looks, which is causing you to think they are partaking in suspicious activity, then yes that is absolutely profiling.

It doesn't matter if you are white, black, arab, latino, etc. If you see a person in all black head to toe clothing, casing a bank, that could be "suspicious activity". By all means, call that in. If you see a black teenager with dreads walking through an upperclass typically white neighborhood, and you call that in, then its absolutely profiling.
 
ucunc156 said:
Suspicious activity is very different than suspicious looks. If you are profiling someone based on their looks, which is causing you to think they are partaking in suspicious activity, then yes that is absolutely profiling.

It doesn't matter if you are white, black, arab, latino, etc. If you see a person in all black head to toe clothing, casing a bank, that could be "suspicious activity". By all means, call that in. If you see a black teenager with dreads walking through an upperclass typically white neighborhood, and you call that in, then its absolutely profiling.
Click to expand...

Suspicious activity is having a bomb strapped to your back (like in Trump's extreme example that he used to make a point)
 
Hans Gruber said:
Suspicious activity is having a bomb strapped to your back (like in Trump's extreme example that he used to make a point)
Click to expand...
Lol thats not suspicious activity, thats blatant criminal activity. Maybe you mean an arab looking person with an abnormal bulge in his upper back? If you see a bomb, call it in. Thats not fucking profiling and nobody insinuates it is lol. Its as stupid as saying "well this black guy raped me, but I don't want to be labeled a racist, so i didn't do report it".
 
TheComebackKid said:
If anyone is even the slightest bit tough on Hillary she would be exposed for all to see. There is no way you can spin that amount of bullshit unless people are helping you.
Click to expand...
You're underestimating her , watch the Benghazi hearings .
 
Hans Gruber said:
He was basically saying that a person that looks like he is from the Middle East could have a bomb strapped to his back but we don't say anything because we are worried about being accused of profiling.

The "bomb strapped to his back" portion is important in this context
Click to expand...
It's a stupid statement unless you can show an instance of that happening.

I know brown people and when they fly they always seem to get selected for random screening , it's uncanny
 
Bill Clinton's cry for help

AxBwes.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,993
Messages
58,474,998
Members
176,048
Latest member
gibberish

Share this page

Back
Top