I see a bit of a debate about Stauskus's athleticism. He is deceptively more athletic than you might think, and they did a piece showing some of his leaping ability back during the tournament, but for pure, factual information, here was his Draft Combine performance versus Elfrid Payton (I think there are like three other Kings fans on the board):
Nik Stauskus (SG)
Lane Agility: 10.79 (5th)
Shuttle Run: 2.92 (t-12th)
3/4 Sprint: 3.27 (t-20th)
Standing Vert: 29.0" (t-29th)
Maximum Vert: 35.5" (t-23rd)
Elfrid Payton (PG)
Lane Agility: 11.06 (13th)
Shuttle Run: 2.92 (t-12th)
3/4 Sprint: 3.23 (13th)
Standing Vert: 31.5" (t-14th)
Maximum Vert: 35.5" (t-23rd)
So Stauskus actually outperformed him in these numbers, and on the upside, Stauskus was among the worse in bodyfat percentage at ~12%, so he probably has more room from improvement simply by working with the S&C & Nutrition Coaches to gain a more favorable lean mass ratio. Payton has bigger hands, but Stauskus is taller and has a greater wingspan.
We went for offense. Nik was the most complete and dominant individual player in the NCAA 64 this last year. Payton is known for defense. One metric none of these test is strength, and strength tends to be just as important as quickness, agility, and leaping for defense. However, I think Stauskus would probably surprise us all in his strength performance relative to the rest of the class, too.
I'm building optimism.