Crime 1000 Muslims descend on Cologne train station to rape and grope women.

It saddens me because I was listening to Molyneux around 2007-2008 and he taught me some things. But he clearly is fucked in the head, no matter if he supports refugees or is against them.

It was mostly his pseudo psychology, and encouragement of kids to "defoo" (divorce themselves from their families and join his cult), that made me decide he was a dud unit.
His anarcho-capitalist stuff wasn't original or particularly insightful, and the same applies to his other philosophy. Plenty of self aggrandisement though.
 
Google translate has gotten a lot better lately...
 
Who makes up the criminal underclass in your cities? Is it mostly ethnic gangs, German bikies or what?

Depends on the City, but it is generally a mixture of those. Ethnic gangs like in the US surely operate but hardly in the open. When you look at the brothel and bouncer business, there is usually quite the competition.
 
So let me get this straight ... Leklok studied History of Guam at Guam University and calls other people's degrees worthless?.

I'm positive he's lying. I've called him uneducated (which he clearly is) at least 100 times and as defensive as he is, he never once mentioned university of Guam. IF....IF he did go there it was for one class because this dude is in no way highly educated.

I am glad there's a fake historian here with a fake degree because according to leklok, I have a fake degree too so I'm glad I not the only one.
 
Last edited:

I can't speak for all of it, but there's a lot of BS in that "article". In the UK they refer to "Asians" instead of Muslims or Arabs, because most of the Muslims there are Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan or Indian (not Arabs). It's not because "Asian" is PC. Everyone knows which group they are referring to. It's not like they are trying to lump them in with the Chinese, Vietnamese, Koreans and Japanese.

Depends on the City, but it is generally a mixture of those. Ethnic gangs like in the US surely operate but hardly in the open. When you look at the brothel and bouncer business, there is usually quite the competition.

No one ethnic group dominates (semi-)organised crime?
 
I can't speak for all of it, but there's a lot of BS in that "article". In the UK they refer to "Asians" instead of Muslims or Arabs, because most of the Muslims there are Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan or Indian (not Arabs). It's not because "Asian" is PC. Everyone knows which group they are referring to. It's not like they are trying to lump them in with the Chinese, Vietnamese, Koreans and Japanese.
I'm not sure what you're saying here. Where's the BS? The only thing I couldn't verify was that Merkel tried to silence this issue at the beginning, which almost seems sensationalist... almost. I'm well aware of what's happening in the UK. One side feels marginalized when the media labels the plethora of instances with certain "people" as being Muslims, the other feels that the media isn't being precise in their descriptions as the many Sikhs aren't causing problems but are also Asian.
 
Depends on the City, but it is generally a mixture of those. Ethnic gangs like in the US surely operate but hardly in the open. When you look at the brothel and bouncer business, there is usually quite the competition.
There's been a huge void since Deso Dogg died (RIP in peace).
 
I'm not sure what you're saying here. Where's the BS? The only thing I couldn't verify was that Merkel tried to silence this issue at the beginning, which almost seems sensationalist... almost. I'm well aware of what's happening in the UK. One side feels marginalized when the media labels the plethora of instances with certain "people" as being Muslims, the other feels that the media isn't being precise in their descriptions as the many Sikhs aren't causing problems but are also Asian.

The whole "they are calling them Asian, it's a PC conspiracy!" is BS. That's always how the British have referred to groups from the sub-continent.
The "article" is tabloid grade sensationalism. American tabloid at that, not German (which are noticeably less shithouse). They use the "just quoting tweets" excuse to get away with posting utter BS.
 
No one ethnic group dominates (semi-)organised crime?

No. You have cities where it is the Turks, where it is ex-Yugos, where it is Lebanese clans. And a lot of crime (break ins e.g.) is committed by Eastern Europeans (Georgia, Roman, Bulgaria).

Southern germany is also a Mafia strong hold but they usually operate under the radar.
 
The joys of mass immigration and multiculturalism. Who would be against such a wonderful thing? Pfft only bigots, racists and white supremacists!
 
No I'm not happy because I'm right. Who the fuck would be happy and excited about this?
 
I can't speak for all of it, but there's a lot of BS in that "article". In the UK they refer to "Asians" instead of Muslims or Arabs, because most of the Muslims there are Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan or Indian (not Arabs). It's not because "Asian" is PC. Everyone knows which group they are referring to. It's not like they are trying to lump them in with the Chinese, Vietnamese, Koreans and Japanese.



No one ethnic group dominates (semi-)organised crime?

It's the progressive "put your head in the sand" approach to dealing with problems that they label others with pejoratives when they try to address these "non-PC" issues.
 
The whole "they are calling them Asian, it's a PC conspiracy!" is BS. That's always how the British have referred to groups from the sub-continent.
The "article" is tabloid grade sensationalism. American tabloid at that, not German (which are noticeably less shithouse). They use the "just quoting tweets" excuse to get away with posting utter BS.
Not really. I could reference video where Muslims were tired of the news reporting offenders as Muslims instead of Asians. The news started calling suspected perps Asians, which angered the Sikhs and other groups from that region. The issue is more complicated than your version.

And the Tweets were from real people, unless you say they aren't. The tweets quoted actually bring up excellent points (that are also feminist in nature). If you don't think that's proper journalism, then we agree. But it doesn't mean the tweets don't have veracity. I just don't think respected articles should bring up tweets from Joe Public, but I didn't post it as some sort of respectable,, Associated Press article, either.
 
This is the nightmare scenario that people are so afraid of when their country agrees to take in thousands of refugees from countries that think women are dogs. Canada at least said they would just take women children and families. Sure there are ways to circumvent that but stats show that 70% of the migrants to Europe are men. I also don't buy the bs that these are from North Africa and that this is happening after a year of accepting so many Syrian refugees is just coincidence.
 
This is the nightmare scenario that people are so afraid of when their country agrees to take in thousands of refugees from countries that think women are dogs. Canada at least said they would just take women children and families. Sure there are ways to circumvent that but stats show that 70% of the migrants to Europe are men. I also don't buy the bs that these are from North Africa and that this is happening after a year of accepting so many Syrian refugees is just coincidence.
Although Canada has done a better job of screening immigrants than Germany or Sweden, their new leader (Trudeau) is a cuck for Islam.


And I bet the Tennessee Powerball lottery that someone is censoring the comments on that first link.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,115
Messages
57,968,803
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair
Back
Top