Media 10-8 Rounds Where The Winner Was Out Struck?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 545701
  • Start date Start date
D

Deleted member 545701

Guest
I recently saw the total strikes for Poirier McGregor 3, and Conor out struck Poirier 43 to 36. Poirier definitely landed more significant strikes, but I thought it was interesting that Conor had the advantage on total strikes. I previously thought Dustin was ahead by a decent amount

upload_2021-8-10_21-57-6.png

Are there any other 10-8 rounds from recent fights that have mirrored this without a point deduction? Put some examples below

Just for reference, the Chandler Oliveira 1st round was this:
Chander (28 total strikes) vs Oliveira (10 total strikes)

I'm sure this has happened a few times before on prelim fights, just haven't seen it too often in the big fights
 
But what were the significant strikes? Shouldn't that be right below the part where this image is cropped?

I'm specifically talking about being out struck in totality. I'm just wonder how often it happens in 10-8 rounds

Poirier out struck Conor in significant strikes 36-27, but Conor out struck him in totality 43-36
 
I think the judges thought Dustin knocked down Mcgregor at the end which is not true

Yeah I think that influenced it as well. Dustin definitely won the round but the final sequence probably edged it towards a 10-8 round. Especially since Dustin was able to land 7 unanswered strikes after Conor broke his tibia.
 
None of this shit matters, McGregor is done and it’s time to move on.
 
Had no clue two judges had the 1st round 10-8 ...I might have had a few too many ginger ale's to remember perfectly, but I don't recall it being imo a 10-8.

As far as this thread, i'm sure there's plenty of rounds where a fighter landed a some shots, got taken down and put in a lot of submission (or fully controlled) trouble ultimately leading to a 10-8.
 
It is cropped because that stuff doesn’t help TS agenda.

The question was pretty clear from the very start. What are some examples of rounds where the winner of the 10-8 is out struck?

But I guess you can also ignore the fact that I referenced the significant strike total as well.

I'm specifically talking about being out struck in totality. I'm just wonder how often it happens in 10-8 rounds

Poirier out struck Conor in significant strikes 36-27, but Conor out struck him in totality 43-36

Factually speaking, if fighter A were to land 150 total strikes and fighter B were to land 125 strikes, fighter A out struck fighter B. While I understand there's different types of strikes, it doesn't change the fact that fighter A out struck fighter B in total. There's plenty of examples of the losing fighter out striking the winner over the course of the whole fight (and losing due to knockdowns or takedowns), but I'm just looking for examples of where the 10-8 round winner is out struck in total.
 
Generally that isn't likely to happen, as why would it be a 10-8 round then? You'd normally have to be coming back from a deficit and then scoring something huge, which should just swing it to a 10-9 for you.

Or you have something like Dustin/Conor where the judges likely thought Conor got dropped and nearly finished, when in reality his foot had broken.
 
If Conor hadn't broken his leg at the end of the 1st, that round would have been a 10-9 for sure IMO, not a 10-8.
 
Conor nuthugger thread in disguise. Sickening. He got whooped, he wasn't going to win. Dustin is a better fighter. Get over it.
 
The only reason it was 10-8 was because Conor was saved by the bell because of his broken leg.

Without that, it's a rather clear 10-9.
 
I would imagine it's possible in a fight where one guy is landing pitter patter shots or just volume with no power and the other guy is landing bombs that drop the other guy a couple of times.
 
Conor nuthugger thread in disguise. Sickening. He got whooped, he wasn't going to win. Dustin is a better fighter. Get over it.

1. Never said Conor was going to win
2. Never said Dustin wasn't the better fighter
3. You could have given an example to help contribute to the thread, but instead you just repeated comments that have already been said by other users

Max vs Ortega? Max vs Kattar?

Max wasn't out struck in any of those rounds, and he didn't lose any round 10-8 in those fights.

You probably read it the other way around which makes sense. I was asking for an example of a fight where the 10-8 round winner is out struck by the loser of the round

The only reason it was 10-8 was because Conor was saved by the bell because of his broken leg.

Without that, it's a rather clear 10-9.

Agreed. It's similar to round 1 of the Mendes fight where Chad cut Conor up and controlled him until the end of the round. That round was scored 10-9 Mendes
 
i think most of Conor's strikes were from bottom when Dustin was GnPing him
 
It is cropped because that stuff doesn’t help TS agenda.
The first post literally says Priorier had more significant strikes
Also it wasn't a 10-8, the knockdown (perceived knockdown) at the end is what swayed the judges
Goes to show that MMA judges can't differentiate between a knockdown and leg break
 
Max wasn't out struck in any of those rounds, and he didn't lose any round 10-8 in those fights.

You probably read it the other way around which makes sense. I was asking for an example of a fight where the 10-8 round winner is out struck by the loser of the round
Well in that case that is the dumbest fucking question i have ever seen someone on here ask.
Ever!!!!
 
Back
Top