- Joined
- May 23, 2017
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 63
I’m bored of champions constantly claiming that the contenders in there division do not deserve a title shot. The champ should always have a next challenger lined up for them in my opinion. Even if no one is standing out in the top 5 ranked challengers, the champion shouldn’t sit out until one guy “deserves” or “earns” a title fight by clearing out all the rest of the top ranked guys.
What do you guys think? Should the champ wait until the top ranked contender is on a heavy win streak and sit out if no one is standing out at #1?
Or should the champ keep cycling through the highest ranked contenders?
****
My example bring the 170 situation, Till/Colby /Usman- I don’t mind who gets the title shot as long as ONE of the top contenders is booked in to fight for the belt. Don’t make them eliminate eachother whole the champ sits out.
What do you guys think? Should the champ wait until the top ranked contender is on a heavy win streak and sit out if no one is standing out at #1?
Or should the champ keep cycling through the highest ranked contenders?
****
My example bring the 170 situation, Till/Colby /Usman- I don’t mind who gets the title shot as long as ONE of the top contenders is booked in to fight for the belt. Don’t make them eliminate eachother whole the champ sits out.