- Joined
- Nov 15, 2017
- Messages
- 284
- Reaction score
- 0
Most recently has to be Brunson vs Anderson. That result was sooooo rigged it was unreal. But worst decision in my eyes has to be Hendricks vs GSP, no way GSP won that fight was such a robbery.
TJ by split hey? so you think one judge should have scored for Cruz then?Dillashaw VS Cruz.. you have to dominate the champ to win the decision, and Cruz didnt..i still have tj by split decision
Machida vs Anders was a robbery.
No, he fucked your mother and your mother was my skank.How can anyone hate Forrest? Did he fuck your wife?
Well, that's your opinion, isn't it?All 3 of those were close fights, not robberies.
Suggesting GSP vs Hendricks is a robbery just indicates either a complete lack of understanding of MMA scoring or a blind adherence to everything Rogan says.
Even ignoring the fact that Hendricks was roided and GSP was clean, it was a close fight at best with a first round that could very well be scored 10-10 (all other rounds were clear as day) and which two judges scored for GSP.
If you want to you can say this fight exposed the flaws of the scoring system but the fight was actually scored correctly under the rules in effect and which rules both fighters were aware of. Roidricks should not have coasted in the fifth relying on a first round which was a toss-up.
Randleman landed twice as many strikes as bas, was on top almost all of the fight and had dominant positions several times.
Rewatch it. It was a horrendous decision
you don't know what youre watching if you call that a robbery.Machida vs Anders was a robbery.
Rewatch the first 3 rounds and tell me which one shogun clearly won.