Seems like the defence has a case. They should just plea this out to a lesser charge and everyone can move on.
That's the issue. What case could they possibly present to convince three jurors that she isn't guilty? Here are the basic, indisputable facts.
1. A guy came into the police station saying she wanted to hire a hitman.
2. She paid like $1200 for a hitman to purchase a handgun, which the police have on video and audio. Plus they have the money.
3. She is again on video and audio seen planning the murder with the undercover officer posing as a hitman. Like clear as day video and audio of her wanting him shot.
4. The morning of the hit, she goes to the gym at the time the hitman told her to.
I mean her defense is so laughable. She did it to get a reality show gig? Then why is the victim not saying that? Why is the hitman not saying that? Even if she was pretending she didn't know the hitman was. So she hired a hitman and paid him.
What retard, inbred piece of shit juror sees all that and thinks she didn't do it? How do you explain the fucking tapes with a hitman then? It just blows my mind how this murderous, cold hearted bitch isn't in jail. She tried to fucking murder someone. She should be sitting her ass in jail.
Then on top of everything some insane person had a baby with her and married her. This is truly an insane world.