- Joined
- Jun 11, 2013
- Messages
- 383
- Reaction score
- 145
Of any combat sports, the top grossing ppv of all time were headlined by manlets. Joe Rogan is my hero and the king of manlets.
You knew that was going to happen TS.Why do people hate on the smaller wieght classes on here?? Lol i dont get it
We all come in different shapes and sizes , do we really expect 5 '6" fighters with 67"inch reach or so to be fighting at 185lbs plus against 6'2" and 75" reach or more guys..whats the point of these threads picking on smaller guys lol..seems pretty childish..i would rather watch competitive fights by weight categories then huge difference freak show fights..it doesnt prove anything any which way and they are usaully very boring to watch..
Someone help me out with the smaller weight class bias...
For the record im 5'9" and would fight WW or LW..70 inch reach
You knew that was going to happen TS.View attachment 407711
You are a 6,5 240. Pounds of pure awesomeness.
And you have a 9 inch penis.
Or you are NOT a sherdogger.
View attachment 407731
Don’t be like Frankie
An honest answer..... The little guy fights are going so fast that it almost resembles choreographed dance. Not always, but a majority of the time. There isn't anyone like this at that weight anymore.
All these dorks have low self-esteem from being over weight and doing nothing with themselves,,just look how often there on here posting..they have nothing better to do lol..so it makes them feel just a little better to make fun of someone that if they saw in person they wouldnt say a word....nailed itWhy do people hate on the smaller wieght classes on here?? Lol i dont get it
We all come in different shapes and sizes , do we really expect 5 '6" fighters with 67"inch reach or so to be fighting at 185lbs plus against 6'2" and 75" reach or more guys..whats the point of these threads picking on smaller guys lol..seems pretty childish..i would rather watch competitive fights by weight categories then huge difference freak show fights..it doesnt prove anything any which way and they are usaully very boring to watch..
Someone help me out with the smaller weight class bias...
For the record im 5'9" and would fight WW or LW..70 inch reach
6 '1 220? you are either fat or on steroidsI am over 6'1' 220 can I safely use the term Manlet?
Why do people hate on the smaller wieght classes on here?? Lol i dont get it
We all come in different shapes and sizes , do we really expect 5 '6" fighters with 67"inch reach or so to be fighting at 185lbs plus against 6'2" and 75" reach or more guys..whats the point of these threads picking on smaller guys lol..seems pretty childish..i would rather watch competitive fights by weight categories then huge difference freak show fights..it doesnt prove anything any which way and they are usaully very boring to watch..
Someone help me out with the smaller weight class bias...
For the record im 5'9" and would fight WW or LW..70 inch reach
Agreed. But Amsterdam only has like 5 Dutch people left. True story.Depends on the city/region. In Amsterdam I feel normal in Groningen a dwarf
People use a substandard definition of manlet. The true, golden standard of manlet is that everyone smaller than Shaq O'Neil is a manlet. Anyone telling you otherwise is themself a manlet, and should be ignored.
So yes, you are a manlet. So is everyone in the UFC (Shaq standard true men are too big to cut to 265), so I wouldn't worry about it.
Sherdog on the other hand is composed almost entirely of guys as big and athletic as Shaq, which is why its so hard on manlets.