- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
- Messages
- 10,941
- Reaction score
- 0
I suppose John Miller deserves the benefit of doubt. He has been such a reliably honest man.
Don't know who that is, and even a Google search didnt help make sense of what you wrote
No I'm not; he looks really, really guilty, almost as though he's been trying to hide something for a long time.
Guilty of what crime exactly? Care to make a little wager?
Will you be bothered when an opposing candidate accepts help from a State enemy?
Because that seems to be the new standard for acceptable.
I have no issue with the free exchange of ideas. Now if they were to pay for it, or there was legit evidence of quid pro quo then that would be a different story.