- Joined
- Mar 22, 2008
- Messages
- 11,124
- Reaction score
- 218
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifesty...an-sued-school-over-dress-code-and-bathrooms/
Cliffs:
-Male Student goes through transition and has name legally changed to "Lily" from "Liam".
-Catholic School officials send "Lily" home for wearing the mandatory female uniform.
-Catholic School Principal tells "Lily" that "She" can either wear the mandatory male uniform or she can find a different school.
-"Lily" sues and finds a lawyer who wants to take the case pro-bono
-"Lily's" lawyer claims the school is in violation of the Equality Act and the Human Rights Act
-"Lily" wins and is allowed to return to the Catholic school in female uniform with "Proper" pronouns.
How in the hell does the Equality Act or the Human Rights act apply to someone with an arbitrary identity? I think this "Lily" has about as much a right to claim Equality or Human Rights Act violations as Rachel Dolezal. She's not black, not one bit, yet if she were to claim that she was treated poorly because of her CHOICE to identify as black, according to this ruling there's no reason that she shouldn't win.
WTF is wrong with UK's justice system/education system? discuss.
Cliffs:
-Male Student goes through transition and has name legally changed to "Lily" from "Liam".
-Catholic School officials send "Lily" home for wearing the mandatory female uniform.
-Catholic School Principal tells "Lily" that "She" can either wear the mandatory male uniform or she can find a different school.
-"Lily" sues and finds a lawyer who wants to take the case pro-bono
-"Lily's" lawyer claims the school is in violation of the Equality Act and the Human Rights Act
-"Lily" wins and is allowed to return to the Catholic school in female uniform with "Proper" pronouns.
How in the hell does the Equality Act or the Human Rights act apply to someone with an arbitrary identity? I think this "Lily" has about as much a right to claim Equality or Human Rights Act violations as Rachel Dolezal. She's not black, not one bit, yet if she were to claim that she was treated poorly because of her CHOICE to identify as black, according to this ruling there's no reason that she shouldn't win.
WTF is wrong with UK's justice system/education system? discuss.
Last edited: