- Joined
- Sep 2, 2016
- Messages
- 783
- Reaction score
- 0
No, his assertion that blacks were not considered human is correct.
At least you agree with something that is true.
His false equivocation is incorrect.
HERE is where logic escapes your mind...
Blacks could be enslaved in this country because government decided that they were not human beings. Unborn human beings can be killed in this country because government has decided that they are not human beings.
Perhaps you can explain the philosophical difference.
Africans have moral consideration, willed volition, cognitive capability, and fit all criteria of being both human and person. Fetus does not.
A human being and a person are one in the SAME. One cannot be a human being without being a person and one cannot be a person without being a human being.
You have to know reason and logic to utilize reason and logic. "Common sense" is shorthand for "I don't want to take the time to use reason".
So far all you have shown is that you don't know what the hell you are talking about, then again I'm NOT surprised. no liberal ever does.
Also, it is NOT a tree, you absolute goof. It's a potential tree.[/QUOTE]
Once again, you demonstrate that you don't know even the basics with regard to embryology or developmental biology. Your analogy is not valid because it ignores the facts of developmental biology. If you had a grasp of the science, you would realize that within the seed, there is, in fact, an oak tree. Immature, but an oak tree none the less.