R
ripskater
Guest
Knowing that God would provide the sacrifice and that Isaac would not be needed.And God asked Abraham to commit an abortion on post-birth fetus.
But that was a test.
Knowing that God would provide the sacrifice and that Isaac would not be needed.And God asked Abraham to commit an abortion on post-birth fetus.
Clearly.Knowing that God would provide the sacrifice and that Isaac would not be needed.
But that was a test.
Knowing that God would provide the sacrifice and that Isaac would not be needed.
But that was a test.
Yeah, but since Isaac was a post-birth fetus, would it really have been a sacrifice?
I mean, maybe God knew he was an inconvenience to his parents because they both had full-time jobs, and they couldn't afford a kid anymore with their partying on the weekends.
Maybe Isaac was going to be the great-great-great-(×15) grandfather of Hitler.
Most abortions are early term and pro-choicers don't see it as having the same moral and ontic value as a newborn.
Until pro-lifers understand this, they will continue with the "this is what pro-choicers think, it's a baby. . ." no they don't actually. A baby is born, a zygote embryo and fetus, of course, is not. "Buh but late term abortions!" Elective late term abortions have been illegal since Roe.
Does it come with bullets?Interesting thought. For every abortion, you get a large calibre gun of your choice. Conservatives would be caught in a horrible dilemma.