- Joined
- Oct 3, 2009
- Messages
- 7,203
- Reaction score
- 512
This has been touched on as a potential explanation of the recent attack in Canada by many posters, but pretty regularly gets brought up. I didn't bring any studies on the matter, but the nexus between male sexual frustration and mass violence is well documented, from "loner" gunmen like in Columbine to ISIS recruits and the documented rape market within ISIS ranks. Even dating back to pre-modern times, there was a clear centrality of sexual appropriation to war and conquest, seeming to incentivize mass violence for dudes who can't get laid.
In a civilization that commodifies romantic success and frames violent behavior as a possible cultural response (or in cases incentivizes aggression as a precondition to expanding one's romantic market value), how do we address this potential issue?
And, in the name of solidarity, I hope to extend an olive branch to any sexually frustrated forever alone-types on this site. If you're a particularly loveless WR member and are bubbling with aggression, the War Room is here for you: member @Fawlty enjoys being watched while he masturbates and will give you his Skype handle so you can set up a romantic rendezvous.
Be careful with this rhetoric.
Some idiot scholars have claimed Hitler was a virgin and that’s why he hated the world. This is utterly false, and a dangerous assertion because you bring the holocaust and ww2 down to not being laid, and ignore all the real reasons it happened.
I think virgins going on killing sprees does reflect the English speaking (mainly North American) culture more than anything. In the world of the kardashians and instagram fame, anything is possible.