*Offenders were known to their victims in 65% of violent burglaries; offenders were strangers in 28%Hey, up for correction. quote it where it's written in the doc. Thanks.
Winding down now. I win.
They make more in the aggregate partly because of the fact that they have, on average, much higher level of education and also because as an immigrant group without a land route to the US they're more likely to come from the upper class from their countries while the averages for whites are dragged down by lower class whites.
However, their higher levels of achievement in education do not translate into positions of power as they are underrepresented in managerial positions.
So because they're qualified they get good jobs but when it comes to deciding on upper levels positions they are frequently passed over for whites despite having higher achievement in education. What heuristic explains that?
Yeah I know and I already touched on why I made that claim, are you paying attention?
*Offenders were known to their victims in 65% of violent burglaries; offenders were strangers in 28%
*On average, household members became victims of violent crimes in about 266,560 burglaries annually. Offenders known to their victims accounted for 65% of these burglaries; strangers accounted for 28%.
Over half (56%) of burglars are white, and 31% are Hispanic.
According to the stats you're more like to be murdered by someone of the _ _ _ _ race.
Think about it.
Biggest twat on the internet.Win what?
Biggest twat on the internet.
It suggests it in light of the fact that they're high achievers on a series of metrics which would seem to indicate they're qualified for those positions. If not racism then what? As I asked, what heuristic explains it?Sure, let's go with that. Does fact that they're under-represented in something mean that there's racism?
Not at all. From the link you didn't read.You're not appreciating what "disproportionately" means.
Neither is thisNot an argument.
Winding down now. I win.
Neither is this
It suggests it in light of the fact that they're high achievers on a series of metrics which would seem to indicate they're qualified for those positions. If not racism then what? As I asked, what heuristic explains it?
Neither is this
As usual the normal suspects here proving why the war room is essentially storm front light
If they bought Toyota they likely didn't.Maybe they culturally value professional occupations rather than managerial positions? Who knows, the immediate conclusion doesn't seem to be therefore racism. Seems a little weird actually.
And why at top managerial positions? Why isn't it pervasive everywhere else, where there's a skewed disparity in their favor? If "because racism" why would they get lower on average interest rate loans than whites? Is the white racist banker more likely to be prejudice against Asians when making a teller promotion?
Asians themselves perceive discrimination in consideration for promotions:Maybe they culturally value professional occupations rather than managerial positions? Who knows, the immediate conclusion doesn't seem to be therefore racism. Seems a little weird actually.
And why at top managerial positions? Why isn't it pervasive everywhere else, where there's a skewed disparity in their favor? If "because racism" why would they get lower on average interest rate loans than whites? Is the white racist banker more likely to be prejudice against Asians when making a teller promotion?
And are given less responsibility which would allow them to build leadership experienceIn the context of institutional forms of discrimination, a quarter or more of Asian Americans say they have been personally discriminated against because they are Asian when applying for jobs ( 27%), when being paid equally or considered for promotions (25%), and when trying to rent or buy housing (25%).
Running a meeting at work is a relatively low bar for providing employees with leadership experience — a prerequisite for an executive position — but our data suggest that Asian Americans are significantly disadvantaged, even in this simple endeavor. Only 51% of Asian American employees indicated that they had led a meeting at work, compared with 68% of white employees.
@Greoric
We're getting way off topic here talking about Asians but suffice to say the situation there is more complicated then you're letting on and Asians are not as happy to be used as the "model minority", to beat other races over the head with, as you might think and I say this as an Asian.
Asians themselves perceive discrimination in consideration for promotions:
And are given less responsibility which would allow them to build leadership experience
Fair enough.The difference is I actually make them. I don't just shitpost threads with rob ford gifs.