- Joined
- Jul 26, 2016
- Messages
- 7,986
- Reaction score
- 59
no argument? Ok.
no argument? Ok.
Why should I argue with a biased troll?no argument? Ok.
He didn´t talk about rankings, he talked about steroids. It sounds like ducking
Oh, i thought you were already posting in a biased troll thread right from the beginning. What happened now, we disagree on an idea and now I´m a troll? Ok, bye mr smart guy.Why should I argue with a biased troll?
Exactly. And right after fighting 2 guys suspended by USADA?Damn, I used to like Brunson. What a downer..
Also, what a bitch move. Try a better excuse next time.
Read all the logical responses in this thread, why are you ignoring them?Oh, i thought you were already posting in a biased troll thread right from the beginning. What happened now, we disagree on an idea and now I´m a troll? Ok, bye mr smart guy.
Then he should´ve said that in his twitter "look Costa, i`m targeting guys above me in the rankings, see you next year".Read all the logical responses in this thread, why are you ignoring them?
This fight does absolutely nothing for Brunson who deserves a top 6 guy.
What?TS trying to get his likes up and it failed
Romero is obviously roiding too, or just a 40 year old freak athlete ?
They're both obvious roiders, so I don't care.
TBF he said see you mid next year if he doesn't pop before so not exactly saying I wont fight you.Then he should´ve said that in his twitter "look Costa, i`m targeting guys above me in the rankings, see you next year".
But what does he do after fighting Silva and Lyoto????? He says "hey Paulo, you´re probably on roids, I´m not fighting you".
why didn´t he talk about the rankings and brought up the steroids excuse? Just sayin
Dude lost to Whittaker and Silva (who was not caught that time around), then one can and a near-retiring Machida and now he wants the belt, go figure....Exactly. And right after fighting 2 guys suspended by USADA?
Still, it didn´t look good for him specially after accusing Costa of steroids. If you don´t think this is kind of a hypocrite thing to say specially after fighting Silva and Lyoto, I´m inclined to say the biased one here is you.TBF he said see you mid next year if he doesn't pop before so not exactly saying I wont fight you.
It was absolutely a bs decision loss to Silva and what the hell kind of logic is fight him anyway if you know he's a cheater? Why the hell would you ever want to fight someone you truly believe is cheating. That literally makes 0 sense.Dude lost to Whittaker and Silva (who was not caught that time around), then one can and a near-retiring Machida and now he wants the belt, go figure....
He's a good fighter though, I like him as a fighter, just a bit disappointed now. If he's so sure Borrachinha is a cheater then fight him, if Brunson loses the worst that thing will happen is the fight being turn into a NC, so nothing to lose.
Obviously you have D grade genetics and F grade ambition.He's obviously roiding, so I don't even care.
He fought two old guys already busted who have name recognition 100 times more than Borrachina and higher ranked. Those were medium risk/high reward. Fighting Borrachina is high risk/no reward. It's easy logic to see but I guess some people need it to be spelled out for them.Still, it didn´t look good for him specially after accusing Costa of steroids. If you don´t think this is kind of a hypocrite thing to say specially after fighting Silva and Lyoto, I´m inclined to say the biased one here is you.