- Joined
- Jan 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,264
- Reaction score
- 138
whether the UFC pressures you to fight by declining to pay you if you don't compete.
This crowd gives Conor zero credit for taking the first Nate fight, so good luck.
whether the UFC pressures you to fight by declining to pay you if you don't compete.
Didnt read, but imo Lamas was winning easily. Other dude kept swinging from the hip, and landed. Not even a Lamas fan, but if he remained composed, he wins that easy.I couldn't help but empathize with lamas after the vicious KO, he looked really disheartened as the fight was going on I think he quickly realized that it was going to be a long night and seemed almost disappointed that he accepted the fight. This pity I had for Lamas was heightened as I found out his father was ringside to watch the violent ending. I can't help but feel Lamas should have had the courage to turn down the fight and for that he must take some self responsibility for what happened, Emmett won fair and square. A similar situation occurred with Tim Elliot but he chose to actually decline the fight which a lot of people thought was a "pussy move", I actually respected it though. Though i feel Lamas needs to take responsibility a bigger question needs to be asked about whether the UFC pressures you to fight by declining to pay you if you don't compete. Should the UFC pay fighters if they make weight and their opponent doesn't?
Lol, it was taken with no belt onthe line, and at a weight Conor didn't have to cut to.This crowd gives Conor zero credit for taking the first Nate fight, so good luck.
Lol, it was taken with no belt onthe line, and at a weight Conor didn't have to cut to.
Nate and Conor are 55ers. Nate wasnt training, so was further out of shape.
Because its in the contract.This. How can anyone be mad at the guy for not making weight. He took it on short notice and did the best he could.
Disagree. Josh looked to be the better striker. Lamas was often beaten to the punch & didn't look comfortable after 1.5 mins.Didnt read, but imo Lamas was winning easily. Other dude kept swinging from the hip, and landed. Not even a Lamas fan, but if he remained composed, he wins that easy.
Well, unless I'm mistaken, when an opponent misses weight the fighter receives 20% of the opponent's purse. That obviously shouldn't happen if they refuse to fight.
IDK how I feel about demanding his normal purse for not fighting. It isn't the UFC's fault that the guy missed weight and they do offer compensation in the form of making the opponent forfeit a portion of the purse.
As the general consensus is some of these guys will be some 15/20lbs heavier than weigh in by the time they fight, I think a fighter has every right to decline a fight if an opponent misses significantly.
If it's a LB or 0.5, something tiny - fair enough, but if a fighter doesn't even attempt to make the bout weight, they're going to be significantly bigger the next day.
Because its in the contract.
As the general consensus is some of these guys will be some 15/20lbs heavier than weigh in by the time they fight, I think a fighter has every right to decline a fight if an opponent misses significantly.
If it's a LB or 0.5, something tiny - fair enough, but if a fighter doesn't even attempt to make the bout weight, they're going to be significantly bigger the next day.
i agree with most of what you said but the fact emmitt was 3pounds off and not like 1 pound off makes me assume when he and lamas were in the cage he was probably like 15pounds heavier than him and he had the advantage of not having to weight-cut hard.
This crowd gives Conor zero credit for taking the first Nate fight, so good luck.