- Joined
- May 14, 2004
- Messages
- 9,360
- Reaction score
- 5,312
Now had you posted this in the original post your title wouldn't have been so stupid.
Now had you posted this in the original post your title wouldn't have been so stupid.
Or you could use Google, but then again your unfounded scread took less brain power.Now had you posted this in the original post your title wouldn't have been so stupid.
What do i work for you? It's your thread bitch not mine, do it right.Or you could use Google, but then again your unfounded scread took less brain power.
The article posted links to a seperate story about the rapes but that would again require reading comprehension and effort.What do i work for you? It's your thread bitch not mine, do it right.
We could hope. That dude is a useless piece of shit.Sure it wasn't this guy?
https://mobile.twitter.com/SheriffClarke/photo
Well for starters, "dudes" implies some plurality which is inaccurate as you will inevitably admit in your following response. Also sexual assault does not necessarily mean rape, unless you can somehow show me this man indeed claimed rape (which you cannot) in the article (which you did not provide) then this is also inaccurate.
Do you have some other article where it says he actually raped multiple men? If so produce it.
I am surprised Milwaukee isn't rioting right now.Oh he did. He was drugging and raping men for some time. There were several local news stories about it when we was finally arrested.
Yea and I read them and it implied nothing of the sort. But again if you read it yourself you would have known but of course the obligatory "reading comprehension, effort blah blah blah"The article posted links to a seperate story about the rapes but that would again require reading comprehension and effort.
I am surprised Milwaukee isn't rioting right now.