Million Woman Protest March

[BrianFantana]

The problem is that women are replacing the men who would be doing a much better job because hiring by merit is sexist and racist.

No one more oppressed than the white man, amirite?

 

[BrianFantana]

It wasn't a problem for Bill then it shouldn't be a problem for Trump. Can't have it both ways...

Who is trying to have it both ways? Seriously.

There's two ways to respond to sexual assault allegations:

1. Denounce them; or
2. Say "but another guy is also accused of sexual assault".

In the first instance, you condemn the act itself. The the second, you tacitly diminish the importance by saying that someone else's sexual assault for some reason makes the one at issue less troublesome.

Imagine rolling this shit into court. You're accused of shooting someone. "But, your honour, someone else shot someone too!"

Oh, really? To jail with you.

This whole "but Bill Clinton is accused of sexual assault" as some sort of defence of Trump, when in fact it is just a moronic deflection, is old, stale, and fucking stupid.

 

[BrianFantana]

Everything he said is demonstrably untrue.

Yeah, but I wanted to demonstrate it. It's fun!

 

[BrianFantana]

that backstage thing was refuted by other contestants so I don't know .. others have been outed so it's now proven at least some of them are being manipulated in some way .. these came out conveniently at the perfect time to try to derail trump's campaign .. people can be influenced into saying things or taking certain positions ..I'm sure trump is aggressive with women .. he's a man .. he should be .. it's not a big deal to me

He said it himself. Who refuted it? Because he confirmed it.

And of course the allegations some to light when the campaign is in swing. Did you look into when those allegations were made? Some of them are decades old. They aren't new or only being brought forth now for publicity.

And do you honestly believe that concerted efforts to derail a campaign are a big issue? If you do, you would be derelict in not immediately demanding an inquiry into Russia's role in the election, given that foreign influence on elections is a gross violation of national sovereignty.

And finally: Trump should be "aggressive" with women? You can "aggressively" pursue women without assaulting them. I know, that's crazy, but it's totally possible. Also, "aggressively" watching teenagers change when you're a 60+ year old man hosting a beauty pageant is repugnant.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

No one more oppressed than the white man, amirite?

I don't agree with that, but it is true that no one is more privileged than a middle to upper class white female.

 

[BrianFantana]

I want my doctor to attempt to replace my heart with the heart of a lion. Can he legally do that? Why not? My body, my choice.

I want to do meth. Can I legally do that? Why not? My body, my choice.

Do you understand how to separate issues?

You can control whether meth goes into your body. The state controls whether possession or use of meth is legal or illegal. So, you can put meth into your body, whether or not it is legal or illegal. They are separate. Nod if you understand.

And your medical example is an awful example of a reductio ad absurdum. We do have, and should retain, the right to make our own medical decisions.

 

[klnOmega]

Do you understand how to separate issues?

You can control whether meth goes into your body. The state controls whether possession or use of meth is legal or illegal. So, you can put meth into your body, whether or not it is legal or illegal. They are separate. Nod if you understand.

And your medical example is an awful example of a reductio ad absurdum. We do have, and should retain, the right to make our own medical decisions.

No, we don't. It would be illegal for a doctor to replace your heart with a lion's heart, even if you consented. Some procedures are just plainly illegal.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

 

[PHATV]

 

[Pixelated Porn]

'Beta Male; Little Cuck' Assaults Female Conservative Reporter

A Canadian female conservative reporter was assaulted by a “beta male” socialist at a neo-Marxist rally - ostensibly in support of “women’s rights” - last Saturday.

Sheila Gunn Reid, the Alberta Bureau Chief for The Rebel, was harassed by what what she described as a “beta male,” “little cuck,” and “little loser.”

While reporting at the event, Reid had her camera struck and pushed into her face by the aforementioned leftist. The violent leftist has since been identified as 34-year-old Jason Dion Bews, who has been arrested and charged with assault and uttering threats by the Edmonton Police Service.

“Get outta my f****** face. I will break your camera,” said Bews before striking Gunn’s camera. “You don’t have a right to film anywhere you go,” he added, despite the event’s occurrence in a public place.


Gunn described the event as a “vulgar, genital-based, blame men, hate democracy, anti-capitalist mess.”

Edmonton-based Jason Franson, who is affiliated with the Canadian Press, recorded much of the incident while neglecting to report on it. Gunn accused of Franson of “suppressing the story” of her being assaulted by Bews.

CLIFFS - probably will go to jail and get a QoS tattoo

 

[JAderholt]

My wife went. I asked her why she was marching, and she gave some personal reasons. But, looking at what guys are saying on this thread, it's pretty obvious why.

It's just like when I would see a news article on FB about BLM, the comments would be different versions of, "what do these s have to complain about".

You people just suck.

 

[My Spot]

Who is trying to have it both ways? Seriously.

There's two ways to respond to sexual assault allegations:

1. Denounce them; or
2. Say "but another guy is also accused of sexual assault".

In the first instance, you condemn the act itself. The the second, you tacitly diminish the importance by saying that someone else's sexual assault for some reason makes the one at issue less troublesome.

Imagine rolling this shit into court. You're accused of shooting someone. "But, your honour, someone else shot someone too!"

Oh, really? To jail with you.

This whole "but Bill Clinton is accused of sexual assault" as some sort of defence of Trump, when in fact it is just a moronic deflection, is old, stale, and fucking stupid.

We're just wondering why you were okay with Clinton doing it but not Trump.

 

[BrianFantana]

I don't agree with that, but it is true that no one is more privileged than a middle to upper class white female.

There's a difference between being stuck-up and enjoying systemic privileges.

 

[BrianFantana]

No, we don't. It would be illegal for a doctor to replace your heart with a lion's heart, even if you consented. Some procedures are just plainly illegal.

I restate: "And your medical example is an awful example of a reductio ad absurdum."

Your bullshit argument doesn't change the foundational principles of medical decision-making, which dictate that patient consent is required in performing medical procedures. In the event the person is deemed incompetent, a substitute decision maker (power of attorney, parent, etc.) makes the decision.

You can't consent to medical impossible procedures, because they can't happen in any event, notwithstanding various medical colleges' Hippocratic oaths. So no, you wouldn't be able to have your head transplanted with a bald eagle's. That doesn't change that women should have the final, and only, say over what happens to and within their bodies.

 

[BrianFantana]

We're just wondering why you were okay with Clinton doing it but not Trump.

This is now the third time you've said this. I have never said I'm okay with it. That you keep repeating it makes me think you're either daft or a very poor troll.

 

[kuromusha]

No, we don't. It would be illegal for a doctor to replace your heart with a lion's heart, even if you consented. Some procedures are just plainly illegal.

Lol gtfo you Communist. No one is telling me I can't get a lion's heart.

 

[My Spot]

This is now the third time you've said this. I have never said I'm okay with it. That you keep repeating it makes me think you're either daft or a very poor troll.

Not until someone called you out on it.

 

[The Sausage King]

My wife went. I asked her why she was marching, and she gave some personal reasons. But, looking at what guys are saying on this thread, it's pretty obvious why.

It's just like when I would see a news article on FB about BLM, the comments would be different versions of, "what do these have to complain about".

You people just suck.

you must be the beta in your relationship - it's obvious you're the follower

 

[irish_thug]

LOL staying at home doesn't mean sitting on your ass, it's hard work. It's cleaning, up keep, raising the children, cooking, etc ...

Women are naturally predisposed to this. Men went out and worked, earned money for his family. This is the natural order.

My wife is a stay at home mother, and she works her ass off.

 

[Lanx]

My wife went. I asked her why she was marching, and she gave some personal reasons. But, looking at what guys are saying on this thread, it's pretty obvious why.

It's just like when I would see a news article on FB about BLM, the comments would be different versions of, "what do these have to complain about".

You people just suck.