- Joined
- Jun 20, 2007
- Messages
- 21,257
- Reaction score
- 8,116
You just don't get the idea that the rules were different at the time. It really isn't worth it with you. You have made up your mind.
Here is the final verdict.
2 judges ruled it how I would have ruled it,.. At that time.
I would rule differently now, based on the different instructions we are given now.
That's reality, now twist it however you want.
I'm not twisting anything. I just stated why it would be a 10-8.
Here is the document no need for a VPN although I do have one
http://vk.com/doc-55587293_437251884
nothing in it about 10-8 rounds but there is judging criteria that is NOT based on the 10 point must system
here it is
takedown: 1 point
throw: 1 point
knockdown:1 point
clear hit through the opponents defences: 1 point
any strike that leads to wobbling of the opponent: 2 points
any flashy move that changes the fight: 2 points
Were these or were these not the rules of the fight at the time ? If they weren't, what were they ?
Last edited: