Lemieux Will Be Keeping Close Eye on Cotto, Ringtv confirms Dec 2nd as a possible date

it was a poor joke i guess.
i referencing that gambling guru who blessed this lowly sub form with his amazing knowledge in the broner vs garcia thread.
/sarcasm
i wanted to take some jabs at the guy myself but the internet where i am can be iffy prohibiting me from posting at times.

What are you guys seeing in particular that will clearly win this fight for Cotto? i don't doubt he can win but it does seem like a tough ask especially for a retirement fight.

so i got a fight wrong? a +200 that i bought at +600? you dont fuken say. the same weekend i also posted nathanial gallimore(+360)

last weekend i posted middling herrera decision(+125) decision with soto karass decision(+700), loma rounds 7-12(+120) along with rounds 7-9(+300), and also middling beltran decision(+330) and vasquez decision(+1200)

but i guess all someone like you will only remember is me also playing unthank may(+550 and he went off as a +300).

three for four...all plus money plays

wtf is wrong with you
 
Last edited:
so i got a fight wrong? a +200 that i bought at +600? you dont fuken say

last weekend i posted middling herrera(+125) decision with soto karass(+700), loma rounds 7-12(+120) along with rounds 7-9(+300), and also middling beltran decision(+330) and vasquez decision(+1200)

but i guess all someone like you will only remember is me also playing unthank may(+550 and he went off as a +300).

three for four...all plus money plays
its the way you were so condescending saying you needed to hold people hands and instruct the entire forum in the art of pugilism. Especially how hard you went after the regulars, and then to be wrong pretty badly...
after the fact you can't even give props you just fold back on look at all my other bets....
so i guess i flip the question back to you

wtf is wrong with you
 
it was a poor joke i guess.
i referencing that gambling guru who blessed this lowly sub form with his amazing knowledge in the broner vs garcia thread.
/sarcasm
i wanted to take some jabs at the guy myself but the internet where i am can be iffy prohibiting me from posting at times.

What are you guys seeing in particular that will clearly win this fight for Cotto? i don't doubt he can win but it does seem like a tough ask especially for a retirement fight.
Cotto is a really good boxer and Lemi is too limited.
 
so i got a fight wrong? a +200 that i bought at +600? you dont fuken say. the same weekend i also posted nathanial gallimore(+360)

last weekend i posted middling herrera decision(+125) decision with soto karass decision(+700), loma rounds 7-12(+120) along with rounds 7-9(+300), and also middling beltran decision(+330) and vasquez decision(+1200)

but i guess all someone like you will only remember is me also playing unthank may(+550 and he went off as a +300).

three for four...all plus money plays

wtf is wrong with you
It wasnt just that you got a fight wrong. It was that the fight you got wrong was a stupid one and that you were a pretenious asshat about it.
 
On the gambling I believe the people on here who make bets they actually have the means to cover, say what bet they made before a fight, and don't brag after the event. Most of us who do gamble know roughly what stakes each other normally gamble with and don't turn up saying they picked some monster upset or say they are putting £10k on Conor by knockout.

But like @zapataxiv said... I'm genuinely really pleased to have you around. I only learnt boxing through bum fights and world star.
 
i mean i see that cott
Cotto is a really good boxer and Lemi is too limited.
o is great at pivoting to either side and using that launch great hooks at the head and body. Great versatile jab that is honestly quite heavy. that being said Lemi is a dynamite puncher he isn't a volume guy like margarito he has real concussive power behind his punches, and if there is any point in your career you are going to get hurt it is in your retirement fight....Right?
 
It wasnt just that you got a fight wrong. It was that the fight you got wrong was a stupid one and that you were a pretenious asshat about it.

you and i have been at for a while...it all started with me and your buddy rr.

he and i dont have a problem, you just wont let the shit go for all the times ive embarrased you

and a lot of people picked broner, andre ward himself thought it wa a pick em

so i guess hes stupid, too?
 
its the way you were so condescending saying you needed to hold people hands and instruct the entire forum in the art of pugilism. Especially how hard you went after the regulars, and then to be wrong pretty badly...
after the fact you can't even give props you just fold back on look at all my other bets....
so i guess i flip the question back to you

yeah, i guy who posted that broner was holding people up in bowling alleys and getting shot at in the clubs while training for garcia when adrian was actually in colorado springs training to get away from that needs to have his hands held

and who said the entire forum...certainly not me.
 
A lot of people who don't slobber on ggg don't agree. I'm a fan of both fighters so it doesn't matter to me, but outboxed is something like Floyd vs Mosley.

There you go. The anti ggg bias evident from your view that his fans must be giving him fellatio.

There's this bias that seems to pervade that you have to be some slick defensive wizard to outbox someone. That's incorrect and is just a shortcut to appear to know a lot about boxing.
 
its the way you were so condescending saying you needed to hold people hands and instruct the entire forum in the art of pugilism. Especially how hard you went after the regulars, and then to be wrong pretty badly...
after the fact you can't even give props you just fold back on look at all my other bets....
so i guess i flip the question back to you

lok at all my other bets?

uh yeah

only when a douchebag like you calls me out

go to the betting forum.

never mentioned any of those bets after the fact. like i said, i just mentioned it for douchbags like you
 
Except for the fact that he didn't. You don't outbox someone to a questionable narrow decision.

I'd say GGG outfought him but didn't really outbox him. The damage he inflicted gave him the win. The knockdown and the couple of times he wobbled him badly clearly stood out above everything because the fight was on pretty even ground.
 
But like @zapataxiv said... I'm genuinely really pleased to have you around. I only learnt boxing through bum fights and world star.
wait they got fight videos on world star now??? i hope they are street fight vids i ant got no times for that pillow fist nonsense

yeah, i guy who posted that broner was holding people up in bowling alleys and getting shot at in the clubs while training for garcia when adrian was actually in colorado springs training to get away from that needs to have his hands held

and who said the entire forum...certainly not me.
i am not going to dig back through the thread, so due to my own lack of due diligence i guess i will concede that to you (though i am pretty sure i remember you taking many shots at the entire sub forum).
lok at all my other bets?

uh yeah

only when a douchebag like you calls me out

go to the betting forum.

never mentioned any of those bets after the fact. like i said, i just mentioned it for douchbags like you
*look
I am alright with being a douchebag can you admit to being asshat that was wrong?
 
i mean i see that cott

o is great at pivoting to either side and using that launch great hooks at the head and body. Great versatile jab that is honestly quite heavy. that being said Lemi is a dynamite puncher he isn't a volume guy like margarito he has real concussive power behind his punches, and if there is any point in your career you are going to get hurt it is in your retirement fight....Right?

Ya it doesnt really make sense for Cotto to go out on, but who knows.
 
you and i have been at for a while...it all started with me and your buddy rr.

he and i dont have a problem, you just wont let the shit go for all the times ive embarrased you

and a lot of people picked broner, andre ward himself thought it wa a pick em

so i guess hes stupid, too?
Nah, but he wasnt a prick about it like you. You seem to be missing that point.

Youre pretentious. Its that simple.
 
There you go. The anti ggg bias evident from your view that his fans must be giving him fellatio.

There's this bias that seems to pervade that you have to be some slick defensive wizard to outbox someone. That's incorrect and is just a shortcut to appear to know a lot about boxing.
I said I'm a fan of both fighters. GGG has a far more rabidly defensive fan base than Jacobs as evidenced that you ignored that. Floyd was walking Mosley down is why I picked that fight. I didn't say you have to be a slick defensive wizard and I don't pretend to know things I don't, and I don't race to boxrec if I can't answer a question. What the hell?
 
Nah, but he wasnt a prick about it like you. You seem to be missing that point.

Youre pretentious. Its that simple.

well maybe if you werent a prick to me then i wont be a prick to you. you need to move on. this all started in the jacobs/golovkin thread

i could care less about you and thats why i only respond to your posts when you go about your condescending ways to me
 
I agree GGG didn't necessarily outbox Jacobs, but did outfight him he did make adjustments by doubling up on the jab and landed quick combinations, against Lemmy he looked like a masterful boxer, I mean he did whatever he wanted to against Lemmy and it looked as if he decided to finally end it when he did
 
Lemi does not do anything for Cotto. It seems like a pointless fight against a much bigger guy who can really punch. I would heavily favor Cotto, but if he wins, so what? Nobody will remember Cotto for that time he beat David Lemieux.

If Cotto wants to keep fighting then he should be matched at 154 against Trout or Charlo. Maybe even a Khan fight at 154, for the money and fun of it. I think those fights would all be more meaningful or memorable than a Lemieux fight.
 
wait they got fight videos on world star now??? i hope they are street fight vids i ant got no times for that pillow fist nonsense


i am not going to dig back through the thread, so due to my own lack of due diligence i guess i will concede that to you (though i am pretty sure i remember you taking many shots at the entire sub forum).

*look
I am alright with being a douchebag can you admit to being asshat that was wrong?

well, im not going to agree to being an asshat. i liked the broner play and never capped the fight with mikey having the ability to average 65 punches a round when he normally only averaged 45-50 when facing ranked world class opponents(fights that lasted over 7 rounds).

that doesnt make me an asshat. it makes me wrong in the way i capped the fight.
 
well, im not going to agree to being an asshat. i liked the broner play and never capped the fight with mikey having the ability to average 65 punches a round when he normally only averaged 45-50 when facing ranked world class opponents(fights that lasted over 7 rounds).

that doesnt make me an asshat. it makes me wrong in the way i capped the fight.
People aren't calling you an asshat for getting the mikey Garcia fight wrong. They're calling you an asshat because you're acting like ace rothstein from casino on gambling, and like roger mayweather about boxing when you are talking to people who aren't exactly here because they saw Kimbo slice dust some bum in a backyard as if they need a class of Quincy k teaches boxing 101.
 
Back
Top