Kyokushin Influences in Dutch Kickboxing

^^^

It's Kenji Kurosaki's legacy.

He often gets forgotten or not remembered enough for his contributions.



From what I know - the Meijiro style of kickboxing was very influenced by traditional Karate.

Kenji Kurosaki I don't think considered himself just Kyokushin @Tayski - he was primarily a Goju-ryu karateka who happened to be there & help Oyama set up Kyokushin. He wasn't a student of Oyama but a sempai. From what I've seen the Meijiro style of kickboxing was a mix of traditional karate, muay thai, Kyokushin & western boxing.

I think the Dutch style & Meijiro style is actually pretty different - I use to think they were very similar when I posted in this thread years ago but over time realised that was wrong & they are slightly different. There are some similarities for sure & a lot of shared stuff but I think the Dutch added individually using their experience of MT & their Kyokushin backgrounds as well. I think they took a lot from Kurosaki & added from their own experiences as well.

Funny that about Jan Plas & Fujiwara - there's actually a photo of the exchange/learning but Kurosaki was also present.

FujiwaravsJanPlas.jpg



Something that's often forgotten about is Toshio Fujiwara was a shotokan karateka before joining Kurosaki and you can clearly see it in his kickboxing - it definitely gave him an edge when it came to setting up kicks/punches.

Also something that's not remembered Kurosaki actually taught a lot of the OG's of Kyokushin like Soeno, Nakamura, Oyama bros etc.
i thought fujiwara studied shorin ryu not shotokan
 
I was about to shit on you just for being spacetime, but the troll isn't technically wrong this time around. At least in theory, dutch rules isn't quite a competition format, but I get what he's saying. Although using that same postmodern logic you can also say that each gym of muay thai trains its own martial art for the ruleset of muay thai... and that each person has their own unique martial art to them... which again wouldn't technically be untrue but it is pedantic

There is a Muay Thai roundhouse kick (well actually two but that's irrelevant), Sidekick, front kick, etc. Kickboxing clubs do not adhere to anything other than what's trendy and what your instructor happens to teach.
 
but if you wanna see more of kyukushin karate in kickboxing you should watch davit kiria and semmy shilt. these guys are so much more interesting to watch too because they use alot more karate techniques :)
Kiriat and Semmy are indeed karate fighters from the kyokushin family at heart ( ashihara fighters actually, but ashihara is a direct kyokushin offshot, an not many outsiders care about the difference). But you confuse karate techniques, with flashy techniques. Most of karate is boring basics, like straights, cross, and hook punches. The flashy kicks most associate with karate are rarely seen in competitions compared to the basic "meat and potato" stuff like roundkick, knees and so on. Kiriat may love the domawashi kaiten geri (rolling drop kick, or whatever you want to call it in english), but even if it looks great on highlight videos, it is a rare technique in knockdown karate (ashihara, kyokyshin, shidokan etc etc) tournaments, and fighters who keep spamming it as often as kiriat, are either exceptional or stupid. How many times has kiriat actually hit with it?
Special techniques are nice if used infrequently enough to be a surprise, but the basics are like basics of any other striking art.


 
By coincidence, I managed to get into a discussion with Jubin (who has been posting on this thead) about the exact same topic on YouTube.

So I've copied and pasted the discussion below. It did start off a little bit like an argument but we ended up talking properly about it, and I think some of the techniques that are mentioned in the post will be worth mentioning.

I'll have a cliffnotes version in the next comment:




clipdrift2 months agoHighlighted comment
Dutch muay thai is a hybrid of boxing and muay thai. what infuences did karate take? plus Ramon dekkers the most famous dutch kickboxer never even did karate

Hide replies


Jimz891 month ago
The guys who pioneered dutch style kickboxing trained in japan and came from a karate background, even today lots of schools still use the word osu even though it's japanase and comes from karate



clipdrift1 month ago
The thing is i Read that jan plas (the biggest pioneer) was a karate fighter who thought muay thai to the dutch. He himself was a Karate fighter but he studied muay thai and thought it. So i dont Know if there was an influence from that alone since he did Not incorparate karate in it. I checked jan plas gym btw and its a muay Thai gym today



clipdrift1 month ago
Look at modern dutch muay thai fighters like nieky holzken or robin van roosmalen. They all started in muay thai and dont use any karate techniques. And what about ramon dekkers? He never did anything else but muay thai. and i have never seen a gym other than a karate gym use the word osu. not even in the netherlands



Andy's Mad House2 days ago
you're wrong mate, Robin Van Roosmalen uses plenty of karate gyms, Rico Verhoeven is a kyokushin black belt, Nieky Holzken blends karate style combinations



clipdrift1 day ago
No he doesnt. Don't try to give karate credit where it's not true. And next time bring some arguments with you. Low kick combinations are not exclusive to karate. And again they trained only Muay Thai



Andy's Mad House14 hours ago
Yes he does, although I didn't mean to say karate gyms, I meant to say "moves". Also Nieky Holzken DOES blend karate style combinations. In fact, I didn't say low kick combinations, i said combinations in general. Go on the sherdog thread: Kyokushin Influences in Dutch Kickboxing. You'll see that karate had more influence on dutch kixcboxing than muay thai did, and there are numerous people that know more about the history of dutch kb than either of us



clipdrift14 hours ago
+Andy's Mad House then why does every muay thai gym offer kickboxing classes? i already did. check it. karate fans say there is heavy influence, others say there isnt one whatsoever. Others say that it is basically muay thai with a focus on hands. which isnt so dumb because ramon dekkers pretty much only trained muay thai in thailand. and again alot of people call it "dutch muay thai" for a reason. so i asked a few old dutch kickboxers that could see the revolution. they told me that back in the day alot of them would do karate but when they started boxing more it faded away. now its alot more thai style. a guy on sherdog told me the so called "typical" karate combinations and i asked my trainer who trained in thailand for years and is multiple european champion. he told me that these combos arent uncommon in muay thai at all.



Andy's Mad House13 hours ago
Well, considering I made that thread and have trained in Holland (Mejiro), I'd like to think I'm knowledgeable enough. Firstly you're wrong on every muay thai gym offering kickboxing classes, I'm in London and the two main muay thai gyms are Diesel and KO, Diesel do not offer kickboxing classes, and KO Muay Thai stopped doing K1 kickboxing. You're also wrong, Ramon Dekkers did not train exclusively in Thailand, he DID train in Thailand but most of his training was at Golden Glory under Cor Hemmers. Dutch Muay Thai is a VERY outdated phrase that not many people use. You're also not factoring in gym differences. I train in muay thai under a thai coach (look up Team Kru Thai, London), but he favours boxing based combinations and body kicks. Lucien Carbin, the dutch trainer, considers his style a blend of kyokushin and muay thai, because he drew more specific influence from the clinch of muay thai. Jan Plas/Cor Hemmers had more to do with kyokushin and goju ryu karate schools and guys like Toshi Fujiwara. There is a VERY big influence on dutch kickboxing from Karate (mainly kyokushin) and that is just a historical fact, you can read about in books published by dutch kickboxers and trainers.It can be felt in guys like Semmy Schilt, Ernesto Hoost and pretty much any major dutch kickboxer outside of Lucien Carbin's tutilage. I don't know why you seem to have such a thing against Karate when it's literally historical fact, and it's history that has been recorded. http://www.sampamma.com/lucien-carbin-dutch-style-muay-thai/ http://goldenglorypattaya.com/?page_id=856 The influence of karate and japanese kickboxing is recorded fact mate. I'm neither dutch nor a karateka and I can see that, so I don't know what your issue is :p Even the technique of the kick is karate esque. I can't see the point in discussing with you if you can't recognise what is recorded history.



clipdrift13 hours ago
good points iam not gonna lie :p iam gonna look at the article later. maybe i havent brought my point across correctly. i mean the influence of of karate in MODERN dutch kickboxing. iam well aware of the fact that it has influences in its developement with names like jan plas and mejiro gym etc. but the thing is that i cant see in in modern dutch kickboxers. except of course fighters like semmy schilt or davit kiria (he isnt dutch though XD ) why? because they actually use typical karate attacks that are nowhere found in muay thai u know? thought i share this: https://www.quora.com/How-similar-is-Muay-Thai-to-Dutch-kickboxing please check out the comment from "chris price" he makes some interesting points
1


Andy's Mad House12 hours ago
I've seen this :) someone linked it on my sherdog thread, although I do recall some of the points he made being corrected in posts on the thread, but I don't wanna say too much because I can't quite remember The reason I would say the influence is still there is because modern dutch kb doesn't really resemble muay thai at all to the educated eye. While I'd imagine my dad wouldn't be able to tell the difference, Muay Thai is built on teep kicks, body kicks and technical boxing (and of course the clinch). Dutch kickboxing is still largely built on punch combinations (but not so much actual boxing) and low kicks. And while kyokushin karate does teach you the spin kicks and high kicks, you'll find that most competitors work with the same punch-kick combos that dutch fighters use, with the main change being that the dutch mix up to the head more (because of the japanese kickboxing influence). Also, you've got to keep in mind that spinning kicks ARE a thing in muay thai, it's a myth that they're not. The reason they don't get used much isn't that they're not taught them, it's because they prefer to focus on simpler techniques for the sake of scoring. Which is why it's rare to see nak muays throw the high kick to wheel kick combos that Andy Souwer would use. I think a lot of this misconception comes from people not really watching muay thai in Thailand. For a long time people have said that muay thai is all about the low kicks, but low kicks are rare in muay thai and don't actually score at all in a fight unless they succeed in buckling the leg of an opponent. Conversely low kicks are VERY popular in japanese kickboxing and knockdown karate, where the rulset is entirely different. Another misconception is that the dutch have better boxing, that's not REALLY true. The dutch are typically volume punchers but largely don't probe with a jab and measure range and find angles like what Thai's do. While Thai's certainly aren't known for their punch they use things like the jab as a range finder and straight punchers far more than the dutch do. Say with the more recent kickboxers, when you look at a guy like Nieky Holzken, he brings some scientific boxing, with rhythm breaks that you'd see in boxing, but he also has kicking combinations that you don't very often see outside of karate.They way he'll throw a punch, follows by an inside low kick, then another punch, outside low kick. That's very unusual in muay thai because in a muay thai fight none of those techniques would have scored at all. Which is why people that are invested in karate would describe that as more of a karate style combination, because in muay thai unless you hurt your opponent with that combination, you may have wasted your time. Or you'll get Rico Verhoeven who as I mentioned before is a kyokushin black belt under his father, and while he fights based on his range, you can't really remove that karate experience from him. Even if he isn't throwing many spin kicks or other more stereotypical karate techniques, the karate is still there, because that's where he learned to kick from the beginning, and its where he got the subtleties of his technique. I do kind of get where you're coming from, but I think that if you watch a lot of stadium muay thai, you sort of notice just how different the fighters from holland really are. There's a world of difference between a fighter like Pakorn or Sittichai and fighters like Robin Van Roosmalen. :)



clipdrift12 hours ago
that was me on your thread XD and in your thread i misstyped "dutch muay thai" with "dutch kickboxing" which was dumb and no one got my point because of my stupid mistake XDXDXD you sure know what you are talking about. not many people know that muay thai actually does has spinning shit and you are also right about the low kicks not scoring in traditional rules. But theres is one thing that confuses me: is there any difference in the Kickboxing style of the dutch guys compared to non-dutch, non-thai muay thai fighters? for example lets compare joe schilling, joseph valtelini,Artem Levin or my coach ulli schick which all trained either in thailand and/or in their homeland but do not have a traditional thai style (atleast under glory rules). My question is if you see any differences because they look kinda similar to me :)
1


Andy's Mad House11 hours ago
I think that's kind of a difficult question because the history of kickboxing in those countries is kind of a mess. Say for example in the UK, muay thai was brought to the UK by a fella that didn't even really know muay thai so much as TKD with some small muay thai knowledge. Artem Levin, I honestly have no idea with. The former soviet union is known for its methodical approach to boxing and judo, but I have no clue about its kickboxing. When it comes to say Joe Schilling, I tend to find that American Muay Thai fighters kind of fight more like sloppy thais. Joe Schilling doesn't do an awful lot different from thai fighters, but he does it all quite sloppily and/or wild compared to them. I feel similarly about Kevin Ross, although I do feel Ross is the better technician. When it comes to Joe Valtelini I know that he has a karate/tkd background as well as a muay thai background but I think he probably favours more dutch techniques just because its what worked for him. I think a lot of the time it depends on what the coach will encourage as well. I think that the dutch style is kind of a myth in itself, because what happens as Vos Gym is very different Chakuriki for example. I think its also in the physical technique as well that creates the difference, I found that guys like Shick (to use your example) and Schilling often don't have that clean technique that you come to expect, they can certainly fight but its those little differences in economy of motion, excess movement, being fidgety and stuff like that, which will physically make their fight look different to say Joe Valtellini who has very clean technique. It won't always necessarily make a difference in the fight, what lands lands. But I think when you watch it, there's usually a lot cleaner technique from dutch and thai fighters. That's only my observational opinion though, I can't really claim it as fact



clipdrift8 hours ago
good points. as far as i know valtelini did have a tdk backround. i might have to disagree with you in regards to rico and his kyokushin backround. even though he definetely is a blackbelt he simply does not use any of it. a blackbelt who uses karate stuff would be for example schilt, so i am not really sure if ricos previous karate backround plays any role in his current fighting style whatsoever :)



Andy's Mad House2 hours ago
again, not true: just because you're not using it in an obvious way, or using techniques that are are shared by other martial arts, does not mean you're not using kyokushin. http://fightland.vice.com/blog/why-does-nobody-care-about-rico-verhoeven Jack Slack, if you didn't already know is the best striking analyst around today and he talks about some of Rico's techniques including mae geri and uchimatageri that are from kyokushin that he uses to great effect in nearly all of his fights. The Carbin shift he talks about is also something that came from Lucien Carbin's kyokushin background. Rico uses his kyokushin a LOT, just because he uses techniques that are shared by other martial arts, does not mean he's using those martial arts instead of his base of kyokushin. If you learned your kicks from karate and you use karate technique on your kicks, then you're using karate in your fights. It doesn't matter if it doesn't look like your doing karate in the ring, because Semmy Schilt didn't look like he was using karate in the ring, but we know he was. I think the only reason you're accepting Schilt's karate and not Rico's is because Schilt's karate background is a widely known fact as opposed to more obscure knowledge



clipdrift55 minutes ago
nice article. i do get your point. the situation kinda reminds me of when edson barboza knocked someone down with a wheel kick. Barboza trained Taekwondo and muay thai. was it a taekwondo kick or a muay thai kick now? because he could have learned it from both martial arts
 
So when I said cliffnotes, what I actually meant was look at these karate techniques from Rico Verhoeven:





The distance that he pulls off those combinations from is very kyokushin, it's up close and despite people talking a lot about the leg kicks of muay thai, if you watch Sitmonchai fighters they tend to go for their leg kicks from more of a middle range.

Getting near chest to chest like they do in kyokushin and dutch kick boxing gets you clinched kneed and elbowed pretty badly, so while Rico might have some nice combos into low kicks, the distance he does them from is much closer than a guy like Pornsaneh:
Pornsanae-Pokkaew-2.-Pornsanae-throws-punch-combination-and-lands-right-low-kick.gif

tumblr_o3uxm4dTCf1up8ga8o1_540.gif


Based on what I've seen from guys like Rico and Robin Van Roosmalen, I would actually say contrary to what Jubin has said, I think kyokushin and dutch kickboxing resemble each other more now than they did 10-15 years ago. Purely on distance alone. A man like Ernesto Hoost or Rob Kaman, while certainly influenced by KK, operate from a distance that I would say resembles muay thai more than typical kyokushin.
 
By coincidence, I managed to get into a discussion with Jubin (who has been posting on this thead) about the exact same topic on YouTube.

So I've copied and pasted the discussion below. It did start off a little bit like an argument but we ended up talking properly about it, and I think some of the techniques that are mentioned in the post will be worth mentioning.

I'll have a cliffnotes version in the next comment:




clipdrift2 months agoHighlighted comment
Dutch muay thai is a hybrid of boxing and muay thai. what infuences did karate take? plus Ramon dekkers the most famous dutch kickboxer never even did karate

Hide replies


Jimz891 month ago
The guys who pioneered dutch style kickboxing trained in japan and came from a karate background, even today lots of schools still use the word osu even though it's japanase and comes from karate



clipdrift1 month ago
The thing is i Read that jan plas (the biggest pioneer) was a karate fighter who thought muay thai to the dutch. He himself was a Karate fighter but he studied muay thai and thought it. So i dont Know if there was an influence from that alone since he did Not incorparate karate in it. I checked jan plas gym btw and its a muay Thai gym today



clipdrift1 month ago
Look at modern dutch muay thai fighters like nieky holzken or robin van roosmalen. They all started in muay thai and dont use any karate techniques. And what about ramon dekkers? He never did anything else but muay thai. and i have never seen a gym other than a karate gym use the word osu. not even in the netherlands



Andy's Mad House2 days ago
you're wrong mate, Robin Van Roosmalen uses plenty of karate gyms, Rico Verhoeven is a kyokushin black belt, Nieky Holzken blends karate style combinations



clipdrift1 day ago
No he doesnt. Don't try to give karate credit where it's not true. And next time bring some arguments with you. Low kick combinations are not exclusive to karate. And again they trained only Muay Thai



Andy's Mad House14 hours ago
Yes he does, although I didn't mean to say karate gyms, I meant to say "moves". Also Nieky Holzken DOES blend karate style combinations. In fact, I didn't say low kick combinations, i said combinations in general. Go on the sherdog thread: Kyokushin Influences in Dutch Kickboxing. You'll see that karate had more influence on dutch kixcboxing than muay thai did, and there are numerous people that know more about the history of dutch kb than either of us



clipdrift14 hours ago
+Andy's Mad House then why does every muay thai gym offer kickboxing classes? i already did. check it. karate fans say there is heavy influence, others say there isnt one whatsoever. Others say that it is basically muay thai with a focus on hands. which isnt so dumb because ramon dekkers pretty much only trained muay thai in thailand. and again alot of people call it "dutch muay thai" for a reason. so i asked a few old dutch kickboxers that could see the revolution. they told me that back in the day alot of them would do karate but when they started boxing more it faded away. now its alot more thai style. a guy on sherdog told me the so called "typical" karate combinations and i asked my trainer who trained in thailand for years and is multiple european champion. he told me that these combos arent uncommon in muay thai at all.



Andy's Mad House13 hours ago
Well, considering I made that thread and have trained in Holland (Mejiro), I'd like to think I'm knowledgeable enough. Firstly you're wrong on every muay thai gym offering kickboxing classes, I'm in London and the two main muay thai gyms are Diesel and KO, Diesel do not offer kickboxing classes, and KO Muay Thai stopped doing K1 kickboxing. You're also wrong, Ramon Dekkers did not train exclusively in Thailand, he DID train in Thailand but most of his training was at Golden Glory under Cor Hemmers. Dutch Muay Thai is a VERY outdated phrase that not many people use. You're also not factoring in gym differences. I train in muay thai under a thai coach (look up Team Kru Thai, London), but he favours boxing based combinations and body kicks. Lucien Carbin, the dutch trainer, considers his style a blend of kyokushin and muay thai, because he drew more specific influence from the clinch of muay thai. Jan Plas/Cor Hemmers had more to do with kyokushin and goju ryu karate schools and guys like Toshi Fujiwara. There is a VERY big influence on dutch kickboxing from Karate (mainly kyokushin) and that is just a historical fact, you can read about in books published by dutch kickboxers and trainers.It can be felt in guys like Semmy Schilt, Ernesto Hoost and pretty much any major dutch kickboxer outside of Lucien Carbin's tutilage. I don't know why you seem to have such a thing against Karate when it's literally historical fact, and it's history that has been recorded. http://www.sampamma.com/lucien-carbin-dutch-style-muay-thai/ http://goldenglorypattaya.com/?page_id=856 The influence of karate and japanese kickboxing is recorded fact mate. I'm neither dutch nor a karateka and I can see that, so I don't know what your issue is :p Even the technique of the kick is karate esque. I can't see the point in discussing with you if you can't recognise what is recorded history.



clipdrift13 hours ago
good points iam not gonna lie :p iam gonna look at the article later. maybe i havent brought my point across correctly. i mean the influence of of karate in MODERN dutch kickboxing. iam well aware of the fact that it has influences in its developement with names like jan plas and mejiro gym etc. but the thing is that i cant see in in modern dutch kickboxers. except of course fighters like semmy schilt or davit kiria (he isnt dutch though XD ) why? because they actually use typical karate attacks that are nowhere found in muay thai u know? thought i share this: https://www.quora.com/How-similar-is-Muay-Thai-to-Dutch-kickboxing please check out the comment from "chris price" he makes some interesting points
1


Andy's Mad House12 hours ago
I've seen this :) someone linked it on my sherdog thread, although I do recall some of the points he made being corrected in posts on the thread, but I don't wanna say too much because I can't quite remember The reason I would say the influence is still there is because modern dutch kb doesn't really resemble muay thai at all to the educated eye. While I'd imagine my dad wouldn't be able to tell the difference, Muay Thai is built on teep kicks, body kicks and technical boxing (and of course the clinch). Dutch kickboxing is still largely built on punch combinations (but not so much actual boxing) and low kicks. And while kyokushin karate does teach you the spin kicks and high kicks, you'll find that most competitors work with the same punch-kick combos that dutch fighters use, with the main change being that the dutch mix up to the head more (because of the japanese kickboxing influence). Also, you've got to keep in mind that spinning kicks ARE a thing in muay thai, it's a myth that they're not. The reason they don't get used much isn't that they're not taught them, it's because they prefer to focus on simpler techniques for the sake of scoring. Which is why it's rare to see nak muays throw the high kick to wheel kick combos that Andy Souwer would use. I think a lot of this misconception comes from people not really watching muay thai in Thailand. For a long time people have said that muay thai is all about the low kicks, but low kicks are rare in muay thai and don't actually score at all in a fight unless they succeed in buckling the leg of an opponent. Conversely low kicks are VERY popular in japanese kickboxing and knockdown karate, where the rulset is entirely different. Another misconception is that the dutch have better boxing, that's not REALLY true. The dutch are typically volume punchers but largely don't probe with a jab and measure range and find angles like what Thai's do. While Thai's certainly aren't known for their punch they use things like the jab as a range finder and straight punchers far more than the dutch do. Say with the more recent kickboxers, when you look at a guy like Nieky Holzken, he brings some scientific boxing, with rhythm breaks that you'd see in boxing, but he also has kicking combinations that you don't very often see outside of karate.They way he'll throw a punch, follows by an inside low kick, then another punch, outside low kick. That's very unusual in muay thai because in a muay thai fight none of those techniques would have scored at all. Which is why people that are invested in karate would describe that as more of a karate style combination, because in muay thai unless you hurt your opponent with that combination, you may have wasted your time. Or you'll get Rico Verhoeven who as I mentioned before is a kyokushin black belt under his father, and while he fights based on his range, you can't really remove that karate experience from him. Even if he isn't throwing many spin kicks or other more stereotypical karate techniques, the karate is still there, because that's where he learned to kick from the beginning, and its where he got the subtleties of his technique. I do kind of get where you're coming from, but I think that if you watch a lot of stadium muay thai, you sort of notice just how different the fighters from holland really are. There's a world of difference between a fighter like Pakorn or Sittichai and fighters like Robin Van Roosmalen. :)



clipdrift12 hours ago
that was me on your thread XD and in your thread i misstyped "dutch muay thai" with "dutch kickboxing" which was dumb and no one got my point because of my stupid mistake XDXDXD you sure know what you are talking about. not many people know that muay thai actually does has spinning shit and you are also right about the low kicks not scoring in traditional rules. But theres is one thing that confuses me: is there any difference in the Kickboxing style of the dutch guys compared to non-dutch, non-thai muay thai fighters? for example lets compare joe schilling, joseph valtelini,Artem Levin or my coach ulli schick which all trained either in thailand and/or in their homeland but do not have a traditional thai style (atleast under glory rules). My question is if you see any differences because they look kinda similar to me :)
1


Andy's Mad House11 hours ago
I think that's kind of a difficult question because the history of kickboxing in those countries is kind of a mess. Say for example in the UK, muay thai was brought to the UK by a fella that didn't even really know muay thai so much as TKD with some small muay thai knowledge. Artem Levin, I honestly have no idea with. The former soviet union is known for its methodical approach to boxing and judo, but I have no clue about its kickboxing. When it comes to say Joe Schilling, I tend to find that American Muay Thai fighters kind of fight more like sloppy thais. Joe Schilling doesn't do an awful lot different from thai fighters, but he does it all quite sloppily and/or wild compared to them. I feel similarly about Kevin Ross, although I do feel Ross is the better technician. When it comes to Joe Valtelini I know that he has a karate/tkd background as well as a muay thai background but I think he probably favours more dutch techniques just because its what worked for him. I think a lot of the time it depends on what the coach will encourage as well. I think that the dutch style is kind of a myth in itself, because what happens as Vos Gym is very different Chakuriki for example. I think its also in the physical technique as well that creates the difference, I found that guys like Shick (to use your example) and Schilling often don't have that clean technique that you come to expect, they can certainly fight but its those little differences in economy of motion, excess movement, being fidgety and stuff like that, which will physically make their fight look different to say Joe Valtellini who has very clean technique. It won't always necessarily make a difference in the fight, what lands lands. But I think when you watch it, there's usually a lot cleaner technique from dutch and thai fighters. That's only my observational opinion though, I can't really claim it as fact



clipdrift8 hours ago
good points. as far as i know valtelini did have a tdk backround. i might have to disagree with you in regards to rico and his kyokushin backround. even though he definetely is a blackbelt he simply does not use any of it. a blackbelt who uses karate stuff would be for example schilt, so i am not really sure if ricos previous karate backround plays any role in his current fighting style whatsoever :)



Andy's Mad House2 hours ago
again, not true: just because you're not using it in an obvious way, or using techniques that are are shared by other martial arts, does not mean you're not using kyokushin. http://fightland.vice.com/blog/why-does-nobody-care-about-rico-verhoeven Jack Slack, if you didn't already know is the best striking analyst around today and he talks about some of Rico's techniques including mae geri and uchimatageri that are from kyokushin that he uses to great effect in nearly all of his fights. The Carbin shift he talks about is also something that came from Lucien Carbin's kyokushin background. Rico uses his kyokushin a LOT, just because he uses techniques that are shared by other martial arts, does not mean he's using those martial arts instead of his base of kyokushin. If you learned your kicks from karate and you use karate technique on your kicks, then you're using karate in your fights. It doesn't matter if it doesn't look like your doing karate in the ring, because Semmy Schilt didn't look like he was using karate in the ring, but we know he was. I think the only reason you're accepting Schilt's karate and not Rico's is because Schilt's karate background is a widely known fact as opposed to more obscure knowledge



clipdrift55 minutes ago
nice article. i do get your point. the situation kinda reminds me of when edson barboza knocked someone down with a wheel kick. Barboza trained Taekwondo and muay thai. was it a taekwondo kick or a muay thai kick now? because he could have learned it from both martial arts

raw


Directing him to Sherdog.... he'll end up looking for it in the heavies
 
By coincidence, I managed to get into a discussion with Jubin (who has been posting on this thead) about the exact same topic on YouTube.

So I've copied and pasted the discussion below.

Funny how we both gave him very similar answers without even consulting each other (you on youtube and me in this thread), especially regarding Holzken and Rico Verhoeven. And you're a Muay Thai guy and I'm originally a Kyokushin guy :)
He's still having none of it no matter how many people are telling him he's wrong, everything is going to deaf ears it seems...
 
Last edited:
To be honest, I think it's a it of a useless discussion. It's not like the Dutch scene hasn't changed over the years. The style of training and fighting that is prevalent now isn't the same as it used to be 20 years ago.

If you watch fights from the late 80s, early 90s, you'll see that there's a big difference between the style back then and now. Kickboxing matches used to be 5 x 3 minutes Thai rules minus the elbows. This used to be the case until around the early 2000s, when K-1 was in its prime, and promoters started to use and fighters started to demand the 3 x 3 minutes K-1 rules format, even outside of tournaments. If you watch early Aerts fights, you'll be surprised to see him use quite a bit of clinching. Hell, the first time he beat Frank Lobman, he did so by outclinching the power puncher.

While the fighters that were trained in the 80s and early 90s actually had a pretty complete game (boxing, kicking and clinching, albeit less developed than the Thai), that has changed over the years. Yes, the punch combos finished with a lowkick is the main staple of Dutch kickboxing, but, while guys like Kaman and Dekkers relied on it, that was only a small part of their game. Nowadays, most Dutch fighters are literally only taught that, which means they're missing a big chunk of skills their predecessors did possess. Anyway, got to go now. Will elaborate further when I get back tonight.
 
Funny how we both gave him very similar answers without even consulting each other (you on youtube and me in this thread), especially regarding Holzken and Rico Verhoeven. And you're a Muay Thai guy and I'm originally a Kyokushin guy :)
He's still having none of it no matter how many people are telling him he's wrong, everything is going to deaf ears it seems...

nah i just like to hear as many opinions as i can first because everybody has a completely different opinion on this topic. If i dont know something i ask. and i ask alot. and iam gonna say everything thats on my mind. this does not mean that iam simply ignoring the things you guys say.
the opinions on this vary quite alot so i like to take them all in first .:) i do get the points and i also agreed with him on alot of things and i also learned alot.
 
Last edited:
Kiriat and Semmy are indeed karate fighters from the kyokushin family at heart ( ashihara fighters actually, but ashihara is a direct kyokushin offshot, an not many outsiders care about the difference). But you confuse karate techniques, with flashy techniques. Most of karate is boring basics, like straights, cross, and hook punches. The flashy kicks most associate with karate are rarely seen in competitions compared to the basic "meat and potato" stuff like roundkick, knees and so on. Kiriat may love the domawashi kaiten geri (rolling drop kick, or whatever you want to call it in english), but even if it looks great on highlight videos, it is a rare technique in knockdown karate (ashihara, kyokyshin, shidokan etc etc) tournaments, and fighters who keep spamming it as often as kiriat, are either exceptional or stupid. How many times has kiriat actually hit with it?
Special techniques are nice if used infrequently enough to be a surprise, but the basics are like basics of any other striking art.




yeah in all of the fights i watched from kiria he hasnt connected . but i havent seen every single one of his fights though.
 
Funny how we both gave him very similar answers without even consulting each other (you on youtube and me in this thread), especially regarding Holzken and Rico Verhoeven. And you're a Muay Thai guy and I'm originally a Kyokushin guy :)
He's still having none of it no matter how many people are telling him he's wrong, everything is going to deaf ears it seems...

Yeah, I mean, I would like to think that where we know our styles pretty well we can identify what is usual or unusual in our respective martial arts.

To his credit, I think Jubin is trying to play devils advocate a bit, but I do feel that he is missing out a bit on what we're saying.

Are you not training kyokushin anymore Tay?
 
To be honest, I think it's a it of a useless discussion. It's not like the Dutch scene hasn't changed over the years. The style of training and fighting that is prevalent now isn't the same as it used to be 20 years ago.

If you watch fights from the late 80s, early 90s, you'll see that there's a big difference between the style back then and now. Kickboxing matches used to be 5 x 3 minutes Thai rules minus the elbows. This used to be the case until around the early 2000s, when K-1 was in its prime, and promoters started to use and fighters started to demand the 3 x 3 minutes K-1 rules format, even outside of tournaments. If you watch early Aerts fights, you'll be surprised to see him use quite a bit of clinching. Hell, the first time he beat Frank Lobman, he did so by outclinching the power puncher.

While the fighters that were trained in the 80s and early 90s actually had a pretty complete game (boxing, kicking and clinching, albeit less developed than the Thai), that has changed over the years. Yes, the punch combos finished with a lowkick is the main staple of Dutch kickboxing, but, while guys like Kaman and Dekkers relied on it, that was only a small part of their game. Nowadays, most Dutch fighters are literally only taught that, which means they're missing a big chunk of skills their predecessors did possess. Anyway, got to go now. Will elaborate further when I get back tonight.

I remember Aerts landed pretty much every head kick of his career coming out of the clinch.

I must be honest, your last paragraph sums up my main issue with the dutch style. I used to quite like it, but the modern dutch approach to kickboxing just doesn't do it any more. A guy like Robin Van Roosmalen, is definitely a skilled fighter, and some people will like watching him brawl it out, but I often feel bored watching his fights because there is very little variety.

That's also essentially what I was saying about the dutch style resembling KK more now than it did back in the day.
 
Yeah, I mean, I would like to think that where we know our styles pretty well we can identify what is usual or unusual in our respective martial arts.

To his credit, I think Jubin is trying to play devils advocate a bit, but I do feel that he is missing out a bit on what we're saying.

Are you not training kyokushin anymore Tay?

I haven't trained Kyokushin for a while now because of several work and family matters, but about to train again in the new year. Probably to your surprise I've been training some Boxing and Muay Thai recently :) (pm if you want more details)

I remember Aerts landed pretty much every head kick of his career coming out of the clinch.

I must be honest, your last paragraph sums up my main issue with the dutch style. I used to quite like it, but the modern dutch approach to kickboxing just doesn't do it any more. A guy like Robin Van Roosmalen, is definitely a skilled fighter, and some people will like watching him brawl it out, but I often feel bored watching his fights because there is very little variety.

That's also essentially what I was saying about the dutch style resembling KK more now than it did back in the day.

Are you saying KK techniques are boring and with no variety? o_O:eek:
 
I haven't trained Kyokushin for a while now because of several work and family matters, but about to train again in the new year. Probably to your surprise I've been training some Boxing and Muay Thai recently :) (pm if you want more details)



Are you saying KK techniques are boring and with no variety? o_O:eek:

Yup KK sucks man, that's why you quit for muay thai and boxing :p
 
Back
Top