Crime Justice is Served: Ohio Woman Who Threw Burrito Bowl at Chipotle Employee's Face Sentenced To Work in Fast Food For 2 Months.

Arkain2K

Si vis pacem, para bellum
@Steel
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
33,424
Reaction score
5,686
Oh I sincerely hope that the news would follow up with which fastfood store this broad will be working at, and the manager would put her in the front counter to deal with the same kind of customers like her.

Ohio woman who threw Chipotle burrito bowl at employee sentenced to work in fast food for 2 months​

By Rebecca Cohen | December 8, 2023



An Ohio woman who threw her freshly made Chipotle burrito bowl in the face of the employee who made it for her is about to learn a lesson in customer service.

Rosemary Hayne, 39, was originally sentenced to 180 days in jail at a Nov. 28 hearing that occurred after the video of her hurling her food at the employee went viral.

Parma Municipal Court Judge Timothy P. Gilligan then suspended 90 of those days and gave Hayne an interesting option for the remainder of the 90-day sentence.

She could spend 60 fewer days in jail if she spent those two months working at a fast-food restaurant for 20 hours a week, he said.

“You didn’t get your burrito bowl the way you like it and this is how you respond?” Gilligan said during sentencing, Cleveland station WJW reported. “This is not 'Real Housewives of Parma.' This behavior is not acceptable.”

Hayne agreed to the deal, prompting Gilligan to delay her jail time until March 12, 2024, so Hayne has enough time to secure a job and complete the agreed-upon hours.

"Do you want to walk in her shoes for two months and learn how people should treat people or do you want to do your jail time?" Gilligan asked Hayne, according to video from court reported by WJW.

"I'd like to walk in her shoes," Hayne responded.

After apologizing to the employee, 17-year-old Emily Russell, in court, Hayne told the judge she acted that way because she didn't like the look of her burrito bowl.

“If I showed you how my food looked and how my food looked a week later from that same restaurant, it’s disgusting looking,” Hayne said, according to WJW.

“I bet you won’t be happy with the food you are going to get in the jail,” the judge shot back, WJW reported.

The video of incident, captured by cellphone at the Chipotle in the Cleveland suburb of Parma, shows Hayne appearing to yell at Russell, who appeared to give Hayne her burrito bowl at the register.

Hayne then threw the hot food right back at Russell, who appears shocked, before storming out of the store.

A bystander appears to try to stop Hayne from exiting the store, with the pair erupting into a screaming match by the restaurant's front door.

Russell told NBC News affiliate in Cleveland, WKYC, that she thinks Gilligan's decision is fair and she wants Hayne to experience what working in fast food is really like.

Russell ended up quitting her job at Chipotle because she was traumatized by the event, she told WJW, adding that she supported the judge's sentence.

"She's going to get what she deserves," Russell told WJW. "She's going to learn how to work in fast food and hopefully it will be good."

Gilligan told WJW he wanted to teach Hayne a lesson in her sentencing.

"So I thought, why should the city taxpayers pay for her and feed her for 90 days in jail if I can teach her a sense of empathy," he said.

Hayne was also ordered to serve two months of probation and refrain from having contact with the victim.

 
Last edited:
All for these alternative sentences for smaller offenses. Creativity in this area could go a long way if done right. Sometimes you need a middle area between probation and jail time.
 
Fuck that. She NEEDS jail. More Jail. No one wants to work with this fat cunt. Let her mop floors and eat shit in Jail.
Why? Do you really that will be more effective than forcing her to maintain employment for two months-- to see what it's like? Note that she must find employment on her own, and there is no onus on any private employer to retain her as an employee if she doesn't do her job effectively. The onus is on her to meet the requirements put forth by the judge for this alternative sentencing, and if she fails, because she gets fired, I assume it will revert to the original punishment, and she'll just have to do jail time, anyway. That would probably leave it at the judge's discretion whether or not to "prorate" however many days she maintained employment, and give her credit for time served.

Furthermore, consider the cost to taxpayers. Every one of her days in jail costs money. It's a relatively minor offense, and the article didn't mention a criminal history of similar offenses.
 
Why? Do you really that will be more effective than forcing her to maintain employment for two months-- to see what it's like? Note that she must find employment on her own, and there is no onus on any private employer to retain her as an employee if she doesn't do her job effectively. The onus is on her to meet the requirements put forth by the judge for this alternative sentencing, and if she fails, because she gets fired, I assume it will revert to the original punishment, and she'll just have to do jail time, anyway. That would probably leave it at the judge's discretion whether or not to "prorate" however many days she maintained employment, and give her credit for time served.

Furthermore, consider the cost to taxpayers. Every one of her days in jail costs money. It's a relatively minor offense, and the article didn't mention a criminal history of similar offenses.

- I hope the customers make her live a hell for two months!
 
Why? Do you really that will be more effective than forcing her to maintain employment for two months-- to see what it's like? Note that she must find employment on her own, and there is no onus on any private employer to retain her as an employee if she doesn't do her job effectively. The onus is on her to meet the requirements put forth by the judge for this alternative sentencing, and if she fails, because she gets fired, I assume it will revert to the original punishment, and she'll just have to do jail time, anyway. That would probably leave it at the judge's discretion whether or not to "prorate" however many days she maintained employment, and give her credit for time served.

Furthermore, consider the cost to taxpayers. Every one of her days in jail costs money. It's a relatively minor offense, and the article didn't mention a criminal history of similar offenses.
I get all of that and if she had showed remorse in the courtroom, I would think it's great....but she showed no remorse when speaking to the judge and continued to blame the quality of her "bowl". Was even a wise ass about it. She thought nothing of assaulting another human over it. I think in this case a harder punishment is justified. Now if they mandated she work the overnight at a waffle house, or the weekend shift at a Popeyes's in Brooklyn, I would be ok with it.
 
I think they are punishing whatever Chipotle she goes to.

They should send her to a fucking gulag. I'm getting tired of terrible people
 
I don’t condone hitting a woman but some random bitch throws hot food in my face over nada ?! Nah fuck all that noise she’s cdtimg choked out . Hope somebody does same to her.
 
the fact that she ordered a burrito bowl tells me all i need to know
 
Glad we finally see a good judge.

It would be awesome if customers started throwing burrito bowls in her face. Like just randomly, for no reason, once per day.
 
Back
Top