- Joined
- Feb 21, 2017
- Messages
- 6,308
- Reaction score
- 354
imo comparing wrestling, judo, and sambo in order of effectiveness and practical value is as much of a waste of a time as comparing boxing, muay thai, and karate in the same manner.
Being "well-rounded" in 1990s MMA meant proficiency in 1 martial art in each phase of fighting [stand-up, takedowns, ground] but today to be truly well-rounded you have to be proficicient in each subphase of fighting.
Meaning that you have to be well-rounded in stand-up [mixing boxing, muay thai, and karate/TKD/capoeira], wrestling [greco, folk-style, judo, sambo], and ground [BJJ, Sambo, Catch-Wrestling.]
Being "well-rounded" in 1990s MMA meant proficiency in 1 martial art in each phase of fighting [stand-up, takedowns, ground] but today to be truly well-rounded you have to be proficicient in each subphase of fighting.
Meaning that you have to be well-rounded in stand-up [mixing boxing, muay thai, and karate/TKD/capoeira], wrestling [greco, folk-style, judo, sambo], and ground [BJJ, Sambo, Catch-Wrestling.]